Synthesis and Characterization of a Linear [Mn3(O2CMe)4(py)8] Complex

Department of Chemistry, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications (Impact Factor: 1.66). 05/2010; 2010:932569. DOI: 10.1155/2010/932569
Source: DOAJ


Two new compounds that consist of the linear trinuclear manganese(II) cation [Mn(3)(O(2)CMe)(4)(py)(8)](2+) cocrystallizing with different counteranions (I(3) (-), [1]; ClO(4) (-), [2]) are reported. Complex 1 was prepared from the reaction of [Mn(O(2)CMe)(2)] . 4H(2)O with I(2) in MeCO(2)H/py, whereas complex 2 was isolated from the reaction of [Mn(3)O(O(2)CMe)(6)(py)(3)] . py with [Mn(ClO(4))(2)] . 6H(2)O in MeCN/py. The crystal structures of both compounds were determined by single crystal X-ray crystallography. Magnetic susceptibility studies that were performed in microcrystalline powder of 1 in the 2-300 K range revealed the presence of antiferromagnetic exchange interactions that resulted in an S = 5/2 ground spin state.

Download full-text


Available from: Anastasios J Tasiopoulos, Sep 30, 2015
35 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option.
    ChemInform 06/2009; 40(25). DOI:10.1002/chin.200925219
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Photosystem II (PSII) is the water splitting enzyme of photosynthesis. Its appearance during evolution dramatically changed the chemical composition of our planet and set in motion an unprecedented explosion in biological activity. Powered by sunlight, PSII supplies biology with the 'hydrogen' needed to convert carbon dioxide into organic molecules. The questions now are can we continue to exploit this photosynthetic process through increased use of biomass as an energy source and, more importantly, can we address the energy/CO2 problem by developing new photochemical technologies which mimic the natural system? (Critical review, 82 references).
    Chemical Society Reviews 02/2009; 38(1):185-96. DOI:10.1039/b802262n · 33.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review focuses primarily on homogeneous catalysts for the oxidation of water, but does include selected heterogeneous systems. It does not attempt to summarize all chemistry related to systems that are capable of oxidizing water. In particular, heterogeneous catalysts that have no direct relevance to understanding the WOC [water-oxidizing complex] are not discussed in detail. Neither are nonbiomimetic systems for artificial photosynthesis or water-splitting in its elements discussed. However, a list of some of the recent references in these areas can be found in section X (Nonbiomimetic Water Oxidation Catalysts). The authors will first give a brief summary of the current view of the photosynthetic WOC and its functionality, followed by analysis of the thermodynamic and kinetic constraints for water-oxidation that have to be overcome by any catalyst. Since manganese is the metal that performs this reaction in the WOC, manganese catalysts will be discussed first, followed by other transition metals, particularly ruthenium. In the final section the authors summarize the principles of reactivity learned from theory and existing models that will guide one toward synthesis of better catalysts in the future. This review does not attempt to summarize manganese chemistry relevant to nonfunctional (structural) models of the WOC, which has been reviewed recently. Water-oxidation catalysts are intrinsically important in their own right, independent of possible biological relevance. They have direct applications as catalysts in artificial photosynthetic systems for the splitting of water that could be used in future fuel cells for the generation of electricity. 133 refs.
    Chemical Reviews 03/1997; 97(1):1-24. DOI:10.1021/cr950201z · 46.57 Impact Factor
Show more