Article

Choosing organic pesticides over synthetic pesticides may not effectively mitigate environmental risk in soybeans.

School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.73). 01/2010; 5(6):e11250. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011250
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Selection of pesticides with small ecological footprints is a key factor in developing sustainable agricultural systems. Policy guiding the selection of pesticides often emphasizes natural products and organic-certified pesticides to increase sustainability, because of the prevailing public opinion that natural products are uniformly safer, and thus more environmentally friendly, than synthetic chemicals.
We report the results of a study examining the environmental impact of several new synthetic and certified organic insecticides under consideration as reduced-risk insecticides for soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) control, using established and novel methodologies to directly quantify pesticide impact in terms of biocontrol services. We found that in addition to reduced efficacy against aphids compared to novel synthetic insecticides, organic approved insecticides had a similar or even greater negative impact on several natural enemy species in lab studies, were more detrimental to biological control organisms in field experiments, and had higher Environmental Impact Quotients at field use rates.
These data bring into caution the widely held assumption that organic pesticides are more environmentally benign than synthetic ones. All pesticides must be evaluated using an empirically-based risk assessment, because generalizations based on chemical origin do not hold true in all cases.

1 Bookmark
 · 
94 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recommended action thresholds for soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, do not adjust for natural enemy impact, although natural enemies contribute important biological control services. Because individual natural enemy species have varied impacts on pest population dynamics, incorporating the impact of a diverse predator guild into an action threshold can be cumbersome. Field surveys identified an aphidophagous natural enemy complex dominated by Orius insidiosus, Coccinella septempunctata, Harmonia axyridis and Aphelinus certus. Functional responses of O. insidiosus were determined in the laboratory, while predation rates of all other natural enemies were obtained from the literature. Natural enemy impacts were normalized using natural enemy units (NEUs), where 1 NEU = 100 aphids consumed or parasitized. A dynamic action threshold (DAT) was developed by combining NEUs with an A. glycines population growth model. With the DAT, an insecticide application was only triggered if natural enemy numbers were insufficient to suppress pest populations. In field experiments, DAT provided equivalent yields to the conventional action threshold and reduced the average number of pesticide applications. The DAT approach has the potential to reduce pesticide use, will help preserve natural enemy populations and can be applied to other pest systems with diverse natural enemy guilds. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry.
    Pest Management Science 10/2013; · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: T he Entomological Society of America's (ESA) Committee on Student Affairs has been organizing student debates at the annual meeting since 1993. At its inception, the objective of this event was to inspire graduate students and emerging scientists to process and filter results and theories that are often incomplete or even contradictory. The experience gained from the research and presentation of conflicting ideas in a public forum could enable participants to effectively contribute scientific knowledge to policy-making entities (Gould et al. 1996). This objective of the debates remains relevant, especially as the ESA has stepped up its initiative to proactively engage and contribute to policy decisions and national or inter-national discussions involving entomological science. The 59th Annual Meeting of the ESA was held in Reno, NV, with the theme Identify, Clarify, Speak Out! In line with this theme, debate topics of interest to both the scientific community and general public on entomol-ogy-related areas were selected for scientific discourse by student teams from nine universities across North America. The following topic statements were debated: 1) The land-grant mission of entomology departments remains economically relevant in the U.S. today; 2) Organic agriculture will solve projected food and water limitations of American society; 3) Traditional breeding programs for host plant resistance to insects are more productive and effective than transgenic programs. Three teams were recruited to work on each topic statement, with one team presenting an unbiased intro-duction, one the Pro side, and one the Con side. They were all involved in semester-long preparation and meeting deadlines before the final showdown. Entomological Society of America Fellow Dr. C. Michael Smith (Professor, Department of Entomology, Kansas State University) was invited as the distinguished speaker to introduce the topics.
    American Entomologist. 12/2013; 59(4):214-228.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since its discovery in 2006, the tomato potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) (TPP), has been considered a signiicant pest of solanaceous crops in New Zealand, resulting in an intensiication of insect pest control measures, often with the use of broad-spectrum insecticides. In the search for more sustainable control methods in outdoor potato crops, several biorational insecticides were tested in laboratory bioassays to assess their effects on TPP behaviour and mortality. The products tested were Organic JMS Stylet-Oil®, Excel Oil®, Eco-Oil®, Neem 600 WP and Sap Sucker Plus. Given the eficacy of JMS Stylet- Oil®, Sap Sucker Plus and Excel Oil® at reducing TPP numbers and their probing/feeding deterrent qualities, these products are now being tested in a ield trial. The impacts of the tested biorational insecticides on beneicial insects are also being assessed in laboratory and ield trials.
    New Zealand Plant Protection 08/2013; 66:333-340.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
44 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014