Article

A mouse model of conduction system patterning abnormalities in heterotaxy syndrome.

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Pediatric Research (Impact Factor: 2.84). 10/2010; 68(4):275-80. DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181ee0028
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Duplication or absence of parts of the specialized cardiac conduction system in patients with heterotaxy syndrome causes significant clinical disease, but the mechanistic basis by which embryonic disruption of left-right patterning alters conduction system patterning in these patients is not well understood. We sought to determine whether a mouse model of X-linked human heterotaxy recapitulates conduction system abnormalities identified in patients with heterotaxy. Cardiac structure and conduction system patterning were evaluated in Zic3 null embryos from e9.5 to e16.5 using genetic and molecular methods. Severe structural abnormalities involving atrial, ventricular, and conotruncal development were associated with a spectrum of disorganized and ambiguous arrangements throughout the conduction system, including the appearance of duplicated structures. The severity and location of conduction system abnormalities correlated with the severity and location of associated structural heart disease and were identifiable at the earliest stages examined. The Zic3 mouse model provides a novel tool to dissect the mechanistic underpinnings of conduction system patterning and dysfunction and its relationship to cardiovascular malformations, making it a promising model to improve understanding and risk assessment in the clinical arena.

Full-text

Available from: Stephanie M Ware, May 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
117 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Mutations in ZIC3 cause X-linked heterotaxy and isolated cardiovascular malformations. Recent data suggest a potential cell-autonomous role for Zic3 in myocardium via regulation of Nppa and Tbx5. We sought to develop a hypomorphic Zic3 mouse to model human heterotaxy and investigate developmental mechanisms underlying variability in cardiac phenotypes.Methods:Zic3 hypomorphic mice were created by targeted insertion of a neomycin cassette and investigated by gross, histologic, and molecular methodsResults:Low level Zic3 expression is sufficient for partial rescue of viability as compared to Zic3 null mice. Concordance of early left-right molecular marker abnormalities and later anatomic abnormalities suggests the primary effect of Zic3 in heart development occurs during left-right patterning. Cardiac specific gene expression of Nppa (ANF) and Tbx5 marked the proper morphological locations in the heart regardless of looping abnormalities.Conclusions:Zic3 hypomorphic mice are a useful model to investigate the variable cardiac defects resulting from a single genetic defect. Low level Zic3 expression rescues the left pulmonary isomerism identified in Zic3 null embryos. Our data do not support a direct role for Zic3 in the myocardium via regulation of Nppa and Tbx5 and suggest the primary effect of Zic3 on cardiac development occurs during left-right patterning.Pediatric Research (2013); doi:10.1038/pr.2013.147.
    Pediatric Research 09/2013; DOI:10.1038/pr.2013.147 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The position or location of the organs and vessels is usually classified into three types: situs solitus, situs inversus, and situs ambigus. Situs solitus is the usual arrangement of organs and vessels within the body. Only 0.6 to 0.8% of patients with situs solitus and levocardia have associated congenital heart diseases. Situs inversus refers to an anatomic arrangement that is the mirror image of situs solitus. The incidence of congenital heart disease is increased to 3 to 5% in the patients with situs inversus. The patients with heterotaxy have congenital heart disease in high incidence, ranging from 50 to nearly 100%. We present four cases diagnosed in our department in a period of 18 months. With these four cases and a review in the literature, we explore the definitions and characteristics of heterotaxy syndromes and we study the role of 3D ultrasound.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 09/2012; 41(5):489–496. DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.015 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heterotaxy syndrome affects the sidedness of heart, lungs, and abdominal viscera, and is associated with complex congenital heart disease. Cardiac sidedness is defined by the position of the morphological right atrium and may be normal, mirror-image, or isomeric. The sinus node has been reported to be present bilaterally in right isomerism and absent bilaterally in left isomerism, although exceptions may occur. Our aim was to evaluate bilaterally the presence or absence of sinus node tissue in autopsy-derived hearts from patients with heterotaxy and to correlate the findings with the sidedness of the two atria. Autopsy and clinical records were reviewed from 41 cases with heterotaxy. From the cardiac specimens, tissue was collected bilaterally from expected sinus node sites. Sinus node tissue was categorized microscopically as normal, hypoplastic, indeterminate, or absent. In hearts thought to show right atrial isomerism, sinus node tissue was detected bilaterally in 54%, was absent on one side in 43%, and was absent on both sides in 3%. For cases with apparent left atrial isomerism, a single sinus node was present in the left-sided atrium in 75% of cases and was absent bilaterally in 25%. Bilateral sinus nodes were observed in only 54% of cases with right isomerism, and bilateral absence of sinus nodes was documented in only 25% of cases with left isomerism. Thus, our findings indicate that the sinus node is not a morphologically right-sided structure, and its presence therefore is not consistently related to the sidedness of the atria.
    Cardiovascular pathology: the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology 01/2012; 21(5):421-7. DOI:10.1016/j.carpath.2011.12.007 · 2.34 Impact Factor