The purpose of this study was to determine the origins of regenerated axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy (ETSN) without donor nerve injury by comparing the time of appearance of regenerating axons for proximally coapted ETSN and distally coapted ETSN. Thirty rabbits were used in each group. In the proximal ETSN group, the ulnar nerve was transected and the distal end sutured to the median nerve 3cm above the elbow joint, whereas in the distal ETSN group, it was 3cm below the elbow joint. Coaptation was performed by wrapping the aponeurosis of nearby muscle. Observations were made weekly for 6 weeks after ETSN. Axonal regeneration was studied by morphometric analysis and immunohistochemistry. The times of appearance of regenerating axons differed in the proximal and distal ETSN groups. Axonal densities in proximal segments of donor nerves continuously increased and the axonal diameters of proximal segments of donor nerves continuously decreased with time after ETSN. Our findings suggest that regenerated axons after ETSN without donor nerve injury originate from the central nervous system rather than coaptation sites.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Many experimental studies have confirmed collateral sprouting of axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy and its possible clinical application. There is still controversy about how the surgical method should be carried out. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively evaluate collateral sprouting of motor and sensory axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without the perineurial window.
End-to-side neurorrhaphy of the distal stump of transected musculocutaneous nerve with intact ulnar nerve with or without a perineurial window was performed in a rat model. Collateral sprouts were quantitatively evaluated by counting of motor and sensory neurons following their retrograde labeling by Fluoro-Ruby and Fluoro-Emerald applied to the ulnar and musculocutaneous nerves, respectively.
Our results show that significantly more motor and sensory axons sent their collateral branches into the recipient nerve in the group with a perineurial window. Some axons were injured during preparation of the perineurial window; the injured axons reinnervated directly into the recipient nerve to contribute to results of functional reinnervation.
The authors conclude that it is necessary to create a perineurial window when using end-to-side neurorrhaphy in clinical practice, especially in brachial plexus reconstruction.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 09/2012; 130(3):609-14. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dc20a · 2.99 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This study is intended to explore the role of human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (HUC-MSCs) in nerve end-to-side anastomosis, as well as in the induction and promotion of growth of nerve lateral bud. The chitosan nerve conduit was prepared based on the biological characteristics of chitosan, and the nerve conduit was filled with HUC-MSCs, and was used to bridge the nerve end-to-side anastomotic stoma. The experimental animals were randomly assigned into three groups (10 in each group), and the nerve end-to-side anastomosis was conducted: (1) group A (control group): traditional tibial nerve–common peroneal nerve end-to-side anastomosis; (2) group B (experimental group 1): tibial nerve–common peroneal nerve end-to-side anastomotic stoma bridged with chitosan nerve conduit; (3) group C (experimental group 2): tibial nerve–common peroneal nerve end-to-side anastomotic stoma bridged by chitosan nerve conduit filled with HUC-MSCs. General morphological observation, nerve electrophysiology, and anti-S-100 immunohistochemistry were performed. All experimental animals survived, and no infections were found at operative incisions. The nerve continuity was in good condition through visual observation when sampling, which is mild adhesion to the surrounding tissue and easy to be separated. 12 W HUC-MSCs chitosan composite nerve conduits were degraded completely after operation. Electrophysiological test showed that the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in group C was significantly higher than that in group A or group B (p
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 05/2015; DOI:10.1007/s12013-015-0578-8 · 1.68 Impact Factor
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.