Current Practice Patterns in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Among Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
The Journal of arthroplasty (Impact Factor: 2.37). 09/2010; 25(6 Suppl):2-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A poll was conducted at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons to determine current practices among its members in primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. This article summarizes the audience responses to a number of multiple choice questions concerning perioperative management and operative practice patterns and preferences including anesthetic choices, blood management, surgical approaches, implant selection, implant fixation, bearing surface choice, postoperative rehabilitation, recommended postoperative activity restrictions, and antibiotic prophylaxis.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experimental studies have suggested that initial micromotion of cementless components may lead to failure of osteointegration. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analyses have shown durable implant fixation can be achieved long-term even when initial instability exists, as evidenced by subsidence. However improved implant stability as a result of subsidence, before osteointegration, has not been shown biomechanically. We asked whether insertionally loose cementless tapered femoral stems show (1) less rotational stability (more toggle); (2) more subsidence; and (3) reduced ability to resist torsion (lower initial construct stiffness), lower torque at failure, and greater rotation to failure in comparison to well-fixed cementless tapered femoral stems. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric femurs were implanted with well-fixed and loose cementless tapered stems. The loose stem construct was obtained by appropriately broaching the femur but afterwards inserting a stem one size smaller than that broached. Femoral stem rotational stability of implanted femurs was tested by measuring the angular rotation (ie, toggle) required to produce a torque of 2 N-m at 0 N, 250 N, and 500 N vertical load in 25° adduction simulating single-legged stance. Subsidence was measured as vertical movement during the toggle tests. Then at 500 N initial vertical load, femoral stems were externally rotated to failure. The construct stiffness between 5 and 40 N-m was determined to assess ability to resist torsion. The torque and rotation to failure were recorded to compare failure characteristics. Groups were compared using mixed model ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc pairwise comparison for toggle and subsidence tests and by Student's paired t-tests for stiffness, torque at failure, and rotation to failure tests. Loose tapered cementless stems were less stable (ie, more toggle) than well-fixed at 0 N of load (p < 0.0001), but no difference was detectable in toggle between loose and well-fixed stems at 250 N (p = 0.7019) and 500 N (p = 0.9970). Loose tapered cementless stems showed significant subsidence at 250 N (p < 0.0001) and 500 N (p < 0.0001), which was not found in the well-fixed stems at 250 N (p = 0.8813) and 500 N (p = 0.1621). Torsional stiffness was lower for loose stems as compared with well-fixed stems (p = 0.0033). No difference in torque at failure (p = 0.7568) or rotation to failure (p = 0.2629) was detected between loose and well-fixed stems. In this study, we observed that insertionally loose cementless stems have the ability to subside and become rotationally stable with loading. They did not exhibit a lower torque or rotation to failure in comparison to well-fixed stems when under simulated single-legged stance. Secondary rotational stabilization may prevent insertionally loose tapered stems from producing a stress pattern that predisposes to early postoperative periprosthetic fracture around loose cemented stems.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 03/2014; 472(7). DOI:10.1007/s11999-014-3577-y · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effects of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study was done by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of a tourniquet in TKA. All related articles which were published up to June 2013 from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails were identified. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan software version 5.1. Thirteen RCTs that involved a total of 689 patients with 689 knees were included in the meta-analysis, which were divided into two groups. The tourniquet group included 351 knees and the non-tourniquet group included 338 knees. The meta-analysis showed that using a tourniquet in TKA could reduce intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference (WMD), -198.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), -279.82 to -116.60; P < 0.01) but did not decrease the calculated blood loss (P = 0.80), which indicates the actual blood loss. Although TKA with a tourniquet could save the operation time for 4.57 min compared to TKA without a tourniquet (WMD, -4.57; 95% CI, -7.59 to -1.56; P < 0.01), it had no clinical significance. Meanwhile, the use of tourniquet could not reduce the possibility of blood transfusion (P > 0.05). Postoperative knee range of motion (ROM) in tourniquet group was 10.41[degree sign] less than that in the non-tourniquet group in early stage (<=10 days after surgery) (WMD, -10.41; 95% CI, -16.41 to -4.41; P < 0.01). Moreover, the use of a tourniquet increased the risk of either thrombotic events (risk ratio (RR), 5.00; 95% CI, 1.31 to 19.10; P = 0.02) or non-thrombotic complications (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.67; P = 0.02). TKA without a tourniquet was superior to TKA with a tourniquet in thromboembolic events and the other related complications. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the actual blood loss. TKA with a tourniquet might hinder patients' early postoperative rehabilitation exercises.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 03/2014; 9(1):13. DOI:10.1186/1749-799X-9-13 · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bone cement has been demonstrated as an essential restorative material in the orthopedic surgery. However current materials often imply unavoidable drawbacks, such as tissue-cement reaction induced thermal injuries and troublesome revision procedure. Here we proposed an injectable alloy cement to address such problems through its liquid-solid phase transition mechanism. The cement is made of a unique alloy BiInSnZn with a specifically designed low melting point 57.5{\deg}C. This property enables its rapid molding into various shapes with high plasticity. Some fundamental characteristics including mechanical strength behaviors and phase transition-induced thermal features have been measured to demonstrate the competence of alloy as unconventional cement with favorable merits. Further biocompatible tests showed that this material could be safely employed in vivo. In addition, experiments also found the alloy cement capability as an excellent contrast agent for radiation imaging. Particularly, the proposed alloy cement with reversible phase transition feature significantly simplifies the revision of cement and prosthesis. This study opens the way to implement alloy material as bone cement to fulfill diverse clinical needs.
    Biomaterials 12/2013; 35(37). DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.048 · 8.31 Impact Factor