Article

A different approach toward screening for bipolar disorder: the prototype matching method.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
Comprehensive psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.08). 07/2010; 51(4):340-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Most screening scales for psychiatric disorders consist of a series of questions about the signs and symptoms of the disorder of interest, and to determine whether a patient screens positive, the scores of the individual items are summed and the total score is compared with an empirically derived threshold. A problem with the score summation approach toward case identification on screening scales is that different studies may find that different thresholds are optimal for distinguishing cases from noncases. An alternative approach toward screening is the prototype matching approach, in which respondents are asked to indicate how well their clinical history matches the described prototype. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we compared the symptom summation and prototype matching approaches toward screening for bipolar disorder in a large sample of psychiatric outpatients. Nine hundred sixty-one psychiatric outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition and completed the Bipolar Spectrum Disorders Scale (BSDS). The BSDS is a unique screening scale consisting of a prototypic description of bipolar disorder. The respondent checks off which items in the prototypic paragraph describes them and also answers a single multiple-choice question at the end of the paragraph asking how well the paragraph describes them. The results of a receiver operating curve analysis found that the score summation and prototype matching approaches toward screening on the BSDS performed equally well. These findings provide preliminary evidence that an alternative approach toward psychiatric screening, the prototype matching approach, is as effective as the traditional score summation method. This raises the intriguing possibility of developing a combined screening scale/educational instrument that can be formatted as a brochure and thus placed in clinicians' waiting rooms, thereby facilitating use of the measure.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    Bipolar Disorders 02/2012; 14(1):1-5. · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders (PDs) Work Group has recommended a reformulation of the PD section, one component of which is a replacement of specified operational criteria with a prototype matching dimensional rating system. The Work Group indicated that prototype ratings have been demonstrated to have good interrater reliability. No study was cited to support this statement, and a review of the reliability literature does not support this claim. The one study that directly compared the reliability of prototype and DSM-IV criteria counting approaches found the DSM-IV approach was much more reliably applied. The Work Group cited 2 studies supporting the validity of the prototype matching approach, one of which had significant methodological limitations and the other changed the a priori threshold on the PD prototype dimensional rating scale to categorize patients into PD positive and negative groups. The Work Group also cited 2 studies suggesting that prototype matching approaches are preferred by clinicians. Several studies have raised concerns about the adequacy of psychiatric diagnostic evaluations conducted in routine clinical practice thereby raising questions about the value of studies of clinicians' preferences in comparing different diagnostic practices. In conclusion, if the prototype matching dimensional approach described in the DSM-5 draft proposal is adopted, then it will have been adopted with essentially no empirical support demonstrating improved reliability or validity. In fact, there is evidence that reliability will be worse than the DSM-IV approach.
    Journal of personality disorders 04/2011; 25(2):206-21. · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the frequency with which bipolar II disorder (BD II) was diagnosed in clinics held in four rural towns in New South Wales (NSW). A retrospective case file audit was conducted for patients referred for psychiatric assessment and treatment in four towns in rural NSW over a period of two years and nine months. Of 559 patients seen for the first time during the study period, 113 (20.2%) were diagnosed with BD II, and of these this diagnosis was made for the first time in 69 patients (61%). Associated clinical findings in BD II patients are presented and a comparison is made with patients with non-bipolar depression seen during the same period. BD II was commonly seen in these rural clinics, and appears to be often under-diagnosed in general practice, as has been found to be the case in urban centres. This is seen as a serious public health problem, which needs to be addressed by educational steps directed at general practitioners (GPs), mental health clinicians, and perhaps also the general public.
    Australasian Psychiatry 04/2012; 20(3):203-7. · 0.60 Impact Factor