Article

Theory of mind deficits in chronically depressed patients.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hauptstrasse 5, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Depression and Anxiety (Impact Factor: 4.61). 09/2010; 27(9):821-8. DOI: 10.1002/da.20713
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Poor theory of mind (ToM) performance has been found in patients with mood disorders, but it has not been examined in the subgroup of chronic depression where ToM deficits may be even more persistent than in acute depressive episodes. The aim of this study was to compare the ToM performance of chronically depressed patients with a healthy control group and to clarify the relation of ToM to other cognitive functions.
ToM performance was assessed in 30 chronically depressed patients and 30 matched healthy controls by two cartoon picture story tests. In addition, logical memory, alertness, and executive functioning were evaluated.
Chronically depressed patients were markedly impaired in all ToM- and neuropsychological tasks compared to healthy controls. Performance in the different ToM tests was significantly correlated with at least one other cognitive variable. After controlling for logical memory and working memory, no ToM tasks predicted being a patient.
Patients with chronic depression present significant deficits in "reading" social interactions, which may be associated with general cognitive impairments.

1 Bookmark
 · 
149 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are differentially related to socioemotional functioning and susceptibility to affective disorders. However, the neurobiology underlying this differential relationship is still poorly understood. This discrepancy could perhaps best be studied by adopting a brain connectivity approach. Whereas the amygdala has repeatedly been linked to neuroticism and extraversion, no study has yet focused on the intrinsic functional architecture of amygdala-centered networks in relation to both traits. To this end, seed-based correlation analysis was employed to reveal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) and its associations with neuroticism and extraversion in 50 healthy participants. Higher neuroticism scores were associated with increased amygdala RSFC with the precuneus, and decreased amygdala RSFC with the temporal poles, insula, and superior temporal gyrus (p < .05, cluster corrected). Conversely, higher extraversion scores were associated with increased amygdala RSFC with the putamen, temporal pole, insula, and several regions of the occipital cortex (p < .05, cluster corrected). The shifts in amygdala RSFC associated with neuroticism may relate to the less-adaptive perception and processing of self-relevant and socioemotional information that is frequently seen in neurotic individuals, whereas the amygdala RSFC pattern associated with extraversion may relate to the heightened reward sensitivity and enhanced socioemotional functioning in extraverts. We hypothesize that the variability in amygdala RSFC observed in the present study could potentially link neuroticism and extraversion to the neurobiology underlying increased susceptibility or resilience to affective disorders.
    Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 12/2013; · 3.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Knowledge of how specific neurocognition (NC) abilities predict social cognition (SC) in schizophrenia has potential to guide novel integrated cognitive-remediation therapies. The scope of studies conducted in this field is limited as they haven't examined a comprehensive set of SC domains and they employ small sample sizes of heterogeneous patient groups. We studied a broad range of NC (sustained attention, processing speed, verbal/visual memory and visual processing/encoding, cognitive flexibility and planning) and SC [different levels of theory of mind (ToM)], attributional bias, emotion recognition and social perception] abilities in 170 remitted schizophrenia patients. Multivariate regression analyses revealed attention and planning as predictors of 1st order ToM. Memory encoding was the strongest predictor of 2nd order ToM. Faux-pas recognition, social perception and emotion recognition were influenced by a combination of cognitive flexibility and memory encoding abilities. Overall, NC predicted anywhere between ∼4–40% of variance observed in specific SC sub-dimensions of attributional bias (4%), 1st order (19%) and 2nd order (12%) theory of mind, faux-pas recognition (28%), social perception (29%) and emotion recognition (39%). Individual SC abilities are predicted by distinctive as well as shared NC abilities. These findings have important implications for integrated cognitive remediation.
    Psychiatry Research. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have shown that frontal and temporal lobe epilepsy, the most common forms of focal epilepsy, may impair theory of mind (ToM) by impacting on key zones of ToM's underlying neural network. Clinical research has characterized the severity and specificity of ToM impairments, as well as model methods of assessment, thereby extending the potential of ToM to expand the scope of the neuropsychology of epilepsy. Theory of mind deficits have been linked to self-rating and coping styles, suggesting a role for ToM in awareness and subjective well-being. The study of ToM in epilepsy is important not only for advancing understanding of its underlying neural network but also for clinical care. A task for the future is to identify patients with and without impaired ToM and the subsequent associations with personality complications and vulnerability to psychiatric comorbidities. Knowledge of the type and direction of the relationship between ToM, personality, and behavior might contribute to characterizing the neurobehavioral consequences of specific epilepsy syndromes as well as planning nonpharmacological treatments for alleviating psychobehavioral distress and social maladjustment.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 10/2014; · 2.06 Impact Factor