Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) (Impact Factor: 1.73). 10/2010; 63(10):1916-35. DOI: 10.1080/17470211003779160
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated the processes underlying performance during cued task switching with transition cues. To this end, transition cueing and explicit cueing were compared in a design controlling for sequential effects in the two preceding trials in order to further examine the contribution of cue processes, task processes, and cue-task transition congruency during transition cueing. The study confirmed that the task-switch cost in transition cueing is larger than the task-switch cost in explicit cueing and showed that this larger switch cost is mainly due to cue processing. We also successfully decomposed performance in transition cueing into cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency on both a theoretical (Experiment 1) and an empirical basis (Experiments 2-3). Our empirical dissociation also demonstrates that cue-task transition congruency affects performance during both cue processing and task processing. We discuss the importance of our findings in relation to the different theories on task switching.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The n-2 repetition cost has been explained by persisting inhibition of a previously valid task set which dissipates over time. This account has two implications, namely that the switch cost decreases with the number of tasks involved in switching and that the cost should also be observed in switching between two tasks. Neither of these implications is supported by empirical evidence. An alternative view is briefly discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    Zeitschrift für Psychologie 01/2013; 221(1):61. · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Executive control development typically has been conceptualized to result from quantitative changes in the efficiency of the underlying processes. In contrast, the present study addressed the possibility of qualitative change with age by examining how children and adults detect task switches. Participants in three age groups (5- and 10-year-old children, young adults) completed two conditions of a cued task-switching paradigm where task cues were presented either in isolation or in conjunction with transition cues. Five-year-olds performed better with transition cues, whereas the reverse effect was observed at age 10 and with adults. Unlike 5-year-olds who detect switches after semantically processing cues, older participants strategically detect switches based on perceptual processing only. Age-related qualitative changes promote increasingly optimal adjustment of executive resources with age.
    Cognition 04/2013; 128(1):1-12. · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of cue processing has become a controversial topic in research on cognitive control using task-switching procedures. Some authors suggested a priming account to explain switch costs as a form of encoding benefit when the cue from the previous trial is repeated and hence challenged theories that attribute task-switch costs to task-set (re)configuration. A rich body of empirical evidence has evolved that indeed shows that cue-encoding repetition priming is an important component in task switching. However, these studies also demonstrate that there are usually substantial “true” task-switch costs. Here, we review this behavioral, electrophysiological, and brain imaging evidence. Moreover, we describe alternative approaches to the explicit task-cuing procedure, such as the usage of transition cues or the task-span procedure. In addition, we address issues related to the type of cue, such as cue transparency. We also discuss methodological and theoretical implications and argue that the explicit task-cuing procedure is suitable to address issues of cognitive control and task-set switching. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    Zeitschrift für Psychologie 01/2013; 221(1):5. · 1.57 Impact Factor