Low-Dose CT Examinations in Crohn's Disease: Impact on Image Quality, Diagnostic Performance, and Radiation Dose
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of simulated low-dose MDCT examinations in patients with Crohn's disease.
Thirty-five MDCT examinations from 25 patients (14 males and 11 females; age range, 16-86 years) with known or suspected Crohn's disease were retrospectively evaluated. The MDCT images (5 mm thickness) were modified by artificially introducing noise using volume CT noise simulation software to simulate low-dose MDCT data acquired with noise indexes (NIs) of 18-35. The 175 MDCT image data sets generated were then randomized and reviewed by two readers to assess the subjective image quality and diagnostic accuracy for confidently detecting Crohn's disease findings on a 5-point scale (1, definitely absent; 5, definitely present). The image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose from the original MDCT examinations served as a reference standard for comparison.
The simulated low-dose CT images with elevated NIs of 18-25 yielded optimal image quality and concordant diagnostic accuracy with standard-dose scans with a mean baseline volume CT dose index of 16 +/- 3.34 (SD) mGy (image quality score, 4-4.9 vs 4.95, respectively; p = 0.4). Images simulating NIs of 30-35 were considered degraded because of excessive image noise and presented lower diagnostic performance (range of image quality score, 3-3.6; weighted kappa = 0.25-0.37; p < 0.001). Diagnostic performance and reader confidence for the determination of Crohn's disease manifestations in cases in which the reference standard was positive were higher at NIs of < or = 25 compared with NI of 30 (reader confidence score, 4.5 vs 3.6, respectively; p < 0.05) and an NI of 35 (3.2, p < 0.05). Compared with the standard-dose examination, a 31-64% reduction in radiation dose was estimated for NI levels of 18-25, which corresponds to image noise of 19-27 HU in subcutaneous fat.
Processed MDCT images with the introduction of noise to simulate low-dose MDCT examinations with NI levels of 18-25 allows substantial dose reduction for CT examinations in Crohn's disease without compromising diagnostic information.
SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Imaging of the small bowel is complicated by its length and its overlapping loops. Recently, however, the development of crosssectional imaging techniques, such as computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has shifted fundamental paradigms in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected or known Crohn's disease (CD). CTE and MRE are noninvasive imaging tests that involve the use of intraluminal oral and intravenous contrast agents to evaluate the small bowel. Here, we review recent advances in each cross-sectional imaging modality, their advantages and disadvantages, and their diagnostic performances in the evaluation of small bowel lesions in CD.01/2015; 13(1):27-38. DOI:10.5217/ir.2015.13.1.27
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Over the last two decades, radiologic imaging has become a vital component in the assessment of patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease (CD). Increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging techniques has been driven by both disease- and patient-specific factors, as well as the realization that other clinical, laboratory, and even surgical evaluations may miss CD-related inflammation, penetrating complications, and obstructive disease. As a disease process, the protean symptoms of CD are often non-specific such as abdominal pain and diarrhea . Even validated clinical indices of CD severity, such as the Crohn’s Disease Index of Activity (CDAI), the clinical endpoint for most therapeutic trials in CD, show poor correlation with biologic activity, especially in certain populations such as patients with fistulizing or obstructing disease [2-4]. In addition, there is little clinical suspicion of Crohn’s fistulae and strictures in a substantial proportion of patients with these ...Abdominal Imaging 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00261-015-0360-9 · 1.73 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare observer performance for detection of intestinal inflammation for low-dose CT enterography (LD-CTE) using scanner-based iterative reconstruction (IR) vs. vendor-independent, adaptive image-based noise reduction (ANLM) or filtered back projection (FBP). Sixty-two LD-CTE exams were performed. LD-CTE images were reconstructed using IR, ANLM, and FBP. Three readers, blinded to image type, marked intestinal inflammation directly on patient images using a specialized workstation over three sessions, interpreting one image type/patient/session. Reference standard was created by a gastroenterologist and radiologist, who reviewed all available data including dismissal Gastroenterology records, and who marked all inflamed bowel segments on the same workstation. Reader and reference localizations were then compared. Non-inferiority was tested using Jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC) figures of merit (FOM) for ANLM and FBP compared to IR. Patient-level analyses for the presence or absence of inflammation were also conducted. There were 46 inflamed bowel segments in 24/62 patients (CTDIvol interquartile range 6.9-10.1 mGy). JAFROC FOM for ANLM and FBP were 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.92) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.92), and were statistically non-inferior to IR (FOM 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.93). Patient-level pooled confidence intervals for sensitivity widely overlapped, as did specificities. Image quality was rated as better with IR and AMLM compared to FBP (p < 0.0001), with no difference in reading times (p = 0.89). Vendor-independent adaptive image-based noise reduction and FBP provided observer performance that was non-inferior to scanner-based IR methods. Adaptive image-based noise reduction maintained or improved upon image quality ratings compared to FBP when performing CTE at lower dose levels.Abdominal Imaging 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00261-015-0384-1 · 1.73 Impact Factor