Article

Perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms, smoking, and recent alcohol use in pregnancy.

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Birth (Impact Factor: 2.05). 06/2010; 37(2):90-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00388.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Perceived discrimination is associated with poor mental health and health-compromising behaviors in a range of vulnerable populations, but this link has not been assessed among pregnant women. We aimed to determine whether perceived discrimination was associated with these important targets of maternal health care among low-income pregnant women.
Face-to-face interviews were conducted in English or Spanish with 4,454 multiethnic, low-income, inner-city women at their first prenatal visit at public health centers in Philadelphia, Penn, USA, from 1999 to 2004. Perceived chronic everyday discrimination (moderate and high levels) in addition to experiences of major discrimination, depressive symptomatology (CES-D >or= 23), smoking in pregnancy (current), and recent alcohol use (12 months before pregnancy) were assessed by patients' self-report.
Moderate everyday discrimination was reported by 873 (20%) women, high everyday discrimination by 238 (5%) women, and an experience of major discrimination by 789 (18%) women. Everyday discrimination was independently associated with depressive symptomatology (moderate = prevalence ratio [PR] of 1.58, 95% CI: 1.38-1.79; high = PR of 1.82, 95% CI: 1.49-2.21); smoking (moderate = PR of 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.36; high = PR of 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.74); and recent alcohol use (moderate = PR of 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.36). However, major discrimination was not independently associated with these outcomes.
This study demonstrated that perceived chronic everyday discrimination, but not major discrimination, was associated with depressive symptoms and health-compromising behaviors independent of potential confounders, including race and ethnicity, among pregnant low-income women.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David A Webb, Mar 17, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
113 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite evidence that discrimination within the health care system may play an important role in perpetuating health disparities, instruments designed to measure discrimination within the health care setting have not been adequately tested or validated. Consequently, we sought to test the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Everyday Discrimination scale, adapted for medical settings. Cross-sectional study. Academic medical center in Chicago. Seventy-four African American patients. We measured factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Seventy-four participants completed the baseline interviews and 66 participants (89%) completed the follow-up interviews. Eighty percent were women. The Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) Scale had a single factor solution (eigenvalue of 4.36), a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 and test-retest reliability of .58 (P<.0001). The DMS was significantly correlated with an overall measure of societal discrimination (EOD) (r=.51, P<.001) as well as two of its three subscales (unfair: r=-.04, P=.76; discrimination: r=.45, P<0.001; worry: r=-.36, P=.002). The DMS was associated with the overall African American Trust in Health Care Scale (r=.27, P=.02) as well as two key subscales (racism: r=.31, P<.001; disrespect: r=.44, P<.001). The DMS scale was inversely associated with the Social Desirability Scale (r=.18, P=.13). The DMS scale was not correlated with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (r=.03, P=.80). The Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale has excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity among our sample of African American patients. Further testing is warranted among other racial/ethnic groups.
    Ethnicity & disease 01/2011; 21(4):502-9. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the current study, a small scale preliminary investigation, was to examine the relationship between pre-pregnancy weight/body image concerns and compensatory behaviors/weight gain among rural women who smoke during pregnancy. Greater pre-pregnancy weight concern and body image concern assessed retrospectively at entry to prenatal care were predicted to yield 1) greater engagement in compensatory behaviors at 3rd trimester, and 2) less weight gain from pre-pregnancy to 3rd trimester. The findings have important implications for programs aimed at smoking cessation or promotion of optimal health in pregnant women. Specifically, screening for these concerns may allow for identification of individuals that may benefit from techniques aimed at facilitating success with cessation and promoting healthy weight control practices over the course of pregnancy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)
    01/2011; 35:17-22. DOI:10.1037/h0094781
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), a widely used measure of daily perceived discrimination, is purported to be unidimensional, to function well among African Americans, and to have adequate construct validity. Two separate studies and data sources were used to examine and cross-validate the psychometric properties of the EDS. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on a sample of African American law students (N = 589), providing strong evidence of local dependence, or nuisance multidimensionality within the EDS. In Study 2, a separate nationally representative community sample (N = 3,527) was used to model the identified local dependence in an item factor analysis (i.e., bifactor model). Next, item response theory (IRT) calibrations were conducted to obtain item parameters. A five-item, revised-EDS was then tested for gender differential item functioning (in an IRT framework). Based on these analyses, a summed score to IRT-scaled score translation table is provided for the revised-EDS. Our results indicate that the revised-EDS is unidimensional, with minimal differential item functioning, and retains predictive validity consistent with the original scale.
    Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 04/2011; 17(2):175-85. DOI:10.1037/a0023356 · 1.36 Impact Factor

Similar Publications