Perceived Discrimination and Depressive Symptoms, Smoking, and Recent Alcohol Use in Pregnancy

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Birth (Impact Factor: 1.26). 06/2010; 37(2):90-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00388.x
Source: PubMed


Perceived discrimination is associated with poor mental health and health-compromising behaviors in a range of vulnerable populations, but this link has not been assessed among pregnant women. We aimed to determine whether perceived discrimination was associated with these important targets of maternal health care among low-income pregnant women.
Face-to-face interviews were conducted in English or Spanish with 4,454 multiethnic, low-income, inner-city women at their first prenatal visit at public health centers in Philadelphia, Penn, USA, from 1999 to 2004. Perceived chronic everyday discrimination (moderate and high levels) in addition to experiences of major discrimination, depressive symptomatology (CES-D >or= 23), smoking in pregnancy (current), and recent alcohol use (12 months before pregnancy) were assessed by patients' self-report.
Moderate everyday discrimination was reported by 873 (20%) women, high everyday discrimination by 238 (5%) women, and an experience of major discrimination by 789 (18%) women. Everyday discrimination was independently associated with depressive symptomatology (moderate = prevalence ratio [PR] of 1.58, 95% CI: 1.38-1.79; high = PR of 1.82, 95% CI: 1.49-2.21); smoking (moderate = PR of 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.36; high = PR of 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.74); and recent alcohol use (moderate = PR of 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.36). However, major discrimination was not independently associated with these outcomes.
This study demonstrated that perceived chronic everyday discrimination, but not major discrimination, was associated with depressive symptoms and health-compromising behaviors independent of potential confounders, including race and ethnicity, among pregnant low-income women.

Download full-text


Available from: David A Webb, Mar 17, 2014
1 Follower
18 Reads
  • Source
    • "There is ample evidence in the literature denoting the association of discrimination, whether direct, indirect, or at the population level, with adverse health status and health outcomes.27–31 Perceived racial and ethnic discrimination in childhood has been shown to have negative effects on health,30,31 including lower self-rated physical health as adults32; preterm birth, low birth weight, and very low birth weight32,33; and depressive symptoms,34 among others. Addressing inequities in neighborhood and social environments would improve health and thus decrease health disparities. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Starting in the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, reports appeared in the literature describing the poor health status and poor health outcomes experienced by minority populations, especially blacks, in the United States. Additionally, attention was brought to the limited access to health services for minority populations. These reports prompted Congress to request the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to conduct a study to assess differences in the kinds and quality of healthcare received by US racial and ethnic minorities and nonminorities. The study culminated in the report Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care.(1) Among the recommendations included in the report published in 2003 is a need for (1) change in legal, regulatory, and policy interventions and (2) health systems interventions. The committee extended the recommendations to include (3) implementation of programs to enhance individual education and empowerment, (4) a need for research into identifying racial and ethnic disparities and the development of and assessment of intervention strategies, and (5) a need to integrate cross-cultural education into the training of all health professionals.(1) Subsequent to this report, there has been an increase in efforts to increase diversity among healthcare providers and research investigators.(2) The American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) continues to encourage recruitment of minorities to careers in medicine, to stress the importance of a diverse medical school faculty and administration, and to graduate culturally competent healthcare providers who will decrease health disparities and improve health equity. Additionally, as noted by Ginther et al in 2011, there continues to be a need to increase diversity at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) not only among the workforce but also among the recipients of awards.(3) To this end, the NIH has established the Working Group on Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce to monitor the efforts of the NIH to increase diversity and to suggest remedies.(4.)
    09/2013; 2(5):50-3. DOI:10.7453/gahmj.2013.052
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite evidence that discrimination within the health care system may play an important role in perpetuating health disparities, instruments designed to measure discrimination within the health care setting have not been adequately tested or validated. Consequently, we sought to test the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Everyday Discrimination scale, adapted for medical settings. Cross-sectional study. Academic medical center in Chicago. Seventy-four African American patients. We measured factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Seventy-four participants completed the baseline interviews and 66 participants (89%) completed the follow-up interviews. Eighty percent were women. The Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) Scale had a single factor solution (eigenvalue of 4.36), a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 and test-retest reliability of .58 (P<.0001). The DMS was significantly correlated with an overall measure of societal discrimination (EOD) (r=.51, P<.001) as well as two of its three subscales (unfair: r=-.04, P=.76; discrimination: r=.45, P<0.001; worry: r=-.36, P=.002). The DMS was associated with the overall African American Trust in Health Care Scale (r=.27, P=.02) as well as two key subscales (racism: r=.31, P<.001; disrespect: r=.44, P<.001). The DMS scale was inversely associated with the Social Desirability Scale (r=.18, P=.13). The DMS scale was not correlated with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (r=.03, P=.80). The Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale has excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity among our sample of African American patients. Further testing is warranted among other racial/ethnic groups.
    Ethnicity & disease 09/2011; 21(4):502-9. · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the current study, a small scale preliminary investigation, was to examine the relationship between pre-pregnancy weight/body image concerns and compensatory behaviors/weight gain among rural women who smoke during pregnancy. Greater pre-pregnancy weight concern and body image concern assessed retrospectively at entry to prenatal care were predicted to yield 1) greater engagement in compensatory behaviors at 3rd trimester, and 2) less weight gain from pre-pregnancy to 3rd trimester. The findings have important implications for programs aimed at smoking cessation or promotion of optimal health in pregnant women. Specifically, screening for these concerns may allow for identification of individuals that may benefit from techniques aimed at facilitating success with cessation and promoting healthy weight control practices over the course of pregnancy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)
    01/2011; 35:17-22. DOI:10.1037/h0094781
Show more