Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 357920, Seattle, WA 98195-7920, USA.
Pain (Impact Factor: 5.84). 07/2010; 150(1):173-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper describes the psychometric properties of the PROMIS-pain interference (PROMIS-PI) bank. An initial candidate item pool (n=644) was developed and evaluated based on the review of existing instruments, interviews with patients, and consultation with pain experts. From this pool, a candidate item bank of 56 items was selected and responses to the items were collected from large community and clinical samples. A total of 14,848 participants responded to all or a subset of candidate items. The responses were calibrated using an item response theory (IRT) model. A final 41-item bank was evaluated with respect to IRT assumptions, model fit, differential item function (DIF), precision, and construct and concurrent validity. Items of the revised bank had good fit to the IRT model (CFI and NNFI/TLI ranged from 0.974 to 0.997), and the data were strongly unidimensional (e.g., ratio of first and second eigenvalue=35). Nine items exhibited statistically significant DIF. However, adjusting for DIF had little practical impact on score estimates and the items were retained without modifying scoring. Scores provided substantial information across levels of pain; for scores in the T-score range 50-80, the reliability was equivalent to 0.96-0.99. Patterns of correlations with other health outcomes supported the construct validity of the item bank. The scores discriminated among persons with different numbers of chronic conditions, disabling conditions, levels of self-reported health, and pain intensity (p<0.0001). The results indicated that the PROMIS-PI items constitute a psychometrically sound bank. Computerized adaptive testing and short forms are available.

Download full-text


Available from: Leigh Callahan, Aug 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "A second assumption pertains to local independence, that is, for respondents with the same latent trait, two items are expected to be statistically independent of each other (i.e., their covariance approaches zero). After extraction of the first factor, residual correlations greater than .10 are indicative of minor dependencies between items, whereas values greater than .20 indicate serious dependencies (Amtmann et al., 2010). The residual correlations for all four subscales were very low, | res r | < .04 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The German Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A[G]) for adolescents assesses four regulatory styles within Deci and Ryan’s (1985) self-determination theory: intrinsic, identified, introjected, and external regulation. The study on N = 2,123 students (1,057 girls) from secondary schools in Austria analyzes the effects of differential item functioning (DIF) on individual and group-level estimates of the latent regulatory styles. The scale demonstrated small DIF for sex and the ages from 10 to 17. The DIF items favored, if anything, younger students and lead to a slight overestimation of their introjected motivation level. However, the practical impact on group-level means was negligible. The SRQ-A[G] represents a reliable instrument to capture sex- and age-related differences in the four regulatory styles throughout adulthood.
    European Journal of Psychological Assessment 01/2014; 30:251-260. DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000185 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Sleep quality was assessed using the 6-item medical outcomes study sleep (MOSS) short form scale (Hays and Stewart 1992). Pain interference was measured using the 6-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form (PRO-PI-SF; Amtmann et al. 2010). Fatigue was assessed using the 9-item fatigue severity scale (FSS; Krupp et al. 1989). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic pain, usually refractory to analgesics, is a significant problem for many individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Preliminary studies suggest that electroencephalography (EEG) biofeedback (also known as neurofeedback, NF) has the potential to help patients with otherwise refractory chronic pain. However, there remain many unanswered questions about the effects and mechanisms of this treatment. We studied 13 individuals with SCI and chronic pain with NF. Ten of the 13 individuals completed 4 sessions each of three different neurofeedback protocols assigned in random order for a total of 12 NF sessions. All three protocols had similar immediate effects on pain intensity. In addition, the participants reported modest pre- to post-treatment decreases in worst pain and pain unpleasantness following completion of the 12 NF sessions. These improvements were maintained at 3-month follow-up. The majority of the participants felt they benefited from and were satisfied with the treatment. No significant effects on measures of other outcome domains (sleep quality, pain interference and fatigue) were observed, although there was a non-significant trend for an increase in fatigue. Finally, pre- to post-treatment changes in EEG bandwidth activity, consistent with the training protocols, were observed in θ and α but not β frequencies. The findings provide preliminary support for the potential efficacy of NF for the treatment of SCI-related pain, and suggest that further clinical studies are warranted.
    Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 03/2013; 38(2). DOI:10.1007/s10484-013-9214-9 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "enjoyment of recreational activities, (e) doing your tasks away from home, and (f) your socializing with others on 5-point scales from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). These six items are the Pain Interference Short Form 6b of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference measure (Amtmann et al., 2010 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Chronic pain acceptance has been shown to be related to positive adjustment to chronic pain in patients presenting with pain as a primary problem. However, the role of pain acceptance in adjustment to chronic pain secondary to a neurological disorder that is often associated with physical disability has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to examine whether two domains of chronic pain acceptance-activity engagement and pain willingness-predict adjustment to pain, controlling for pain intensity and key demographic and clinical variables in individuals with muscular dystrophy (MD), multiple sclerosis (MS), post-polio syndrome (PPS), or spinal cord injury (SCI). Method: Participants were 508 community-dwelling adults with a diagnosis of MD, MS, PPS, or SCI who also endorsed a chronic pain problem. Participants completed self-report measures of pain acceptance, quality of life, pain interference, pain intensity, depression, and social role satisfaction. Results: Hierarchical linear regressions indicated that activity engagement predicted lower pain interference and depression, and greater quality of life and social role satisfaction. Pain willingness predicted less pain interference and depression. Together, the two pain acceptance subscales accounted for more variance in outcomes than did self-reported pain intensity. Conclusions: Findings correspond with the broader pain acceptance literature, although activity engagement appears to be a more robust predictor of adjustment than does pain willingness. This research supports the need for future studies to determine the extent to which treatments that increase acceptance result in positive outcomes in persons with chronic pain secondary to neurological disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
    Rehabilitation Psychology 02/2013; 58(1):1-9. DOI:10.1037/a0031727 · 1.91 Impact Factor
Show more