A randomised controlled trial of computer-assisted interviewing in sexual health clinics

Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sexually transmitted infections (Impact Factor: 3.4). 08/2010; 86(4):310-4. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.043422
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the impact of computer-assisted interview compared with pen and paper on disclosure of sexual behaviour, diagnostic testing by clinicians, infections diagnosed and referral for counselling.
Two-centre parallel three-arm randomised controlled open trial. Computer-generated randomisation with allocation concealment using sealed envelopes.
Two London teaching hospital sexual health clinics.
2351 clinic attenders over the age of 16 years.
Computer-assisted self-interview (CASI). Computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI). Pen and paper interview (PAPI).
Diagnostic tests ordered, sexually transmitted infections (STI).
Disclosure of sexual risk, referral for counselling.
801, 763 and 787 patients randomly allocated to receive CASI, CAPI and PAPI. 795, 744 and 779 were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Significantly more diagnostic testing for hepatitis B and C and rectal samples in the CAPI arm (odds for more testing relative to PAPI 1.32; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.59). This pattern was not seen among CASI patients. HIV testing was significantly lower among CASI patients (odds for less testing relative to PAPI 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90). STI diagnoses were not significantly different by trial arm. A summary measure of seven prespecified sensitive behaviours found greater reporting with CASI (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6) and CAPI (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7) compared with PAPI.
CASI and CAPI can generate greater recording of risky behaviour than traditional PAPI. Increased disclosure did not increase STI diagnoses. Safeguards may be needed to ensure that clinicians are prompted to act upon disclosures made during self-interview.

Download full-text


Available from: Ona McCarthy, Sep 27, 2015
1 Follower
18 Reads
  • Source
    • "The pervasive use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the study population may make protocol training and data entry easier for participants [29,30]. Electronic platforms can time-stamp all data, from reminders to start/finish diaries, to actual initiation and completion, allows a precise analysis of participant compliance [4,8,14,18]. Moreover, researchers can standardize measures across participants and have increased flexibility, including using branching/contingency questions, or multilingual versions of instruments [4,12,18,19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Self-reports of sensitive, socially stigmatized or illegal behavior are common in STI/HIV research, but can raise challenges in terms of data reliability and validity. The use of electronic data collection tools, including ecological momentary assessment (EMA), can increase the accuracy of this information by allowing a participant to self-administer a survey or diary entry, in their own environment, as close to the occurrence of the behavior as possible. In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility of using cell phone-based EMA as a tool for understanding sexual risk and STI among adult men and women. As part of a larger prospective clinical study on sexual risk behavior and incident STI in clinically recruited adult men and women, using study-provided cell phones, participants (N = 243) completed thrice-daily EMA diaries monitoring individual and partner-specific emotional attributes, non-sexual activities, non-coital or coital sexual behaviors, and contraceptive behaviors. Using these data, we assess feasibility in terms of participant compliance, behavior reactivity, general method acceptability and method efficacy for capturing behaviors. Participants were highly compliant with diary entry protocol and schedule: over the entire 12 study weeks, participants submitted 89.7% (54,914/61,236) of the expected diary entries, with an average of 18.86 of the 21 expected diaries (85.7%) each week. Submission did not differ substantially across gender, race/ethnicity and baseline sexually transmitted infection status. A sufficient volume and range of sexual behaviors were captured, with reporting trends in different legal and illegal behaviors showing small variation over time. Participants found the methodology to be acceptable, enjoyed and felt comfortable participating in the study. Achieving the correct medium of data collection can drastically improve, or degrade, the timeliness and quality of an individual's self-reported sexual risk behavior, which in turn, is a key factor in the success of intervention or education programs relying on this information. Our findings demonstrate that completion of electronic diaries via cellular phone is feasible way to describe STI/HIV risk among clinically recruited adult men and women.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology 06/2012; 12(1):75. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-12-75 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Finally, we used in-person pen and paper interviews to collect data related to sexual risk behaviors. Although evidence is compelling that computer-assisted interviewing is preferable when asking for sensitive personal information such as sex risk (Fairley et al. 2010; Richens et al. 2010), we were unable to bring computers into the prison setting. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Incarcerated women are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections. Left untreated, these infections can have severe adverse health effects. In this study the authors present prevalence rates of trichomonas, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, and factors related to having a sexually transmitted infection in a sample of 245 hazardously-drinking incarcerated women who reported heterosexual intercourse in the previous 3 months. Vaginal swabs were collected following the self-report baseline assessment. Participants averaged 34.0 (±8.8) years of age; 174 (71.3%) were non-Hispanic Caucasian, 47 (19.3%) were African-American, 17 (7.0%) were Hispanic, and 6 (2.5%) were of other racial or ethnic origins. Twenty-three percent of participants tested positive for chlamydia, trichomonas, or gonorrhea. Being African-American, more frequent sex with a casual partner, and reporting more than one male partner were significantly positively related to sexually transmitted infection, while more frequent sex with a main partner was inversely related. Due to the high rates of infection in this population, jail admission provides a public health opportunity to access a concentrated group of sexually transmitted infectious women. Sexually transmitted infection testing targeted at specific demographic factors, for instance younger age, will miss infected women. Risky sexual partnerships, as well as the benefit of maintaining stable main partnerships may be important topics during sexually transmitted infection prevention interventions.
    Women & Health 03/2012; 52(2):119-34. DOI:10.1080/03630242.2011.649396 · 1.05 Impact Factor
  • Sexually transmitted infections 10/2010; 86(5):336. DOI:10.1136/sti.2010.046680 · 3.40 Impact Factor
Show more