Article

Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 06/2010; 33(6):781-92.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop an archive of self-report questions assessing sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments (SRI), to develop item banks from this archive, and to validate and calibrate the item banks using classic validation techniques and item response theory analyses in a sample of clinical and community participants.
Cross-sectional self-report study.
Academic medical center and participant homes.
One thousand nine hundred ninety-three adults recruited from an Internet polling sample and 259 adults recruited from medical, psychiatric, and sleep clinics.
None.
This study was part of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System), a National Institutes of Health Roadmap initiative. Self-report item banks were developed through an iterative process of literature searches, collecting and sorting items, expert content review, qualitative patient research, and pilot testing. Internal consistency, convergent validity, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were examined in the resulting item banks. Factor analyses identified 2 preliminary item banks, sleep disturbance and SRI. Item response theory analyses and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 27 and 16 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by moderate to high correlations with existing scales and by significant differences in sleep disturbance and SRI scores between participants with and without sleep disorders.
The PROMIS sleep disturbance and SRI item banks have excellent measurement properties and may prove to be useful for assessing general aspects of sleep and SRI with various groups of patients and interventions.

Full-text

Available from: Paul A Pilkonis, May 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
136 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate self-report measures of sleep disturbances and sleep-related impairments in samples of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) or spinal cord injury (SCI) DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. Community-based PARTICIPANTS: Adults (age 18 and older) with either MS (N=461) or SCI (N=239) who were enrolled in a longitudinal survey of self-reported health outcomes and who completed self-report sleep measures at one time point. None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Medical Outcomes Study sleep (MOS-S) scale, Patient Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD) and PROMIS Sleep Related Impairments (PROMIS-SRI) short forms RESULTS: Mean scores on the MOS-S Sleep Index II were significantly worse for both the MS and SCI samples than those of previously reported samples representative of the US general population (p<.0001 for each group). The PROMIS-SD and PROMIS-SRI scores of the MS sample were also significantly different than those reported for the calibration cohort (p<.0001 on each scale). However, while the SCI sample's scores were significantly different from those of the comparison cohort for the PROMIS-SRI (p=.045), the differences on the PROMIS-SD were not significant (p=.069). While the MOS-S scores for the MS and SCI cohorts clearly indicated significantly high levels of sleep related problems and were consistent with existing literature, the more ambiguous findings from the PROMIS-SD and PROMIS-SRI suggest that not enough is currently known about how these instruments function when applied to those with chronic neurological dysfunction. Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 10/2014; 96(3). DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.001 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A growing number of positive airway pressure (PAP) device users will develop physical/sensory impairments such as arthritis. For these individuals, the usability of their PAP devices (eg, efficiency and satisfaction) may impact the frequency and safety of device usage. Questionnaires to assess PAP usability are unavailable; therefore, we developed the Usability of Sleep Apnea Equipment - Positive Airway Pressure (USE-PAP) questionnaire. Questionnaire development included in-depth interviews to identify relevant content areas, a technical advisory panel to review/edit items, cognitive interviews to refine items, and a cross-sectional survey of Veterans Affairs sleep clinic patients assessing PAP device usability overall (one multi-item scale), usability of PAP components (multi-item scales for machine controls, mask/headgear, tubing, and humidifier), frequency of usability-related issues (one multi-item scale), PAP device characteristics, and demographics. After conducting 19 in-depth interviews, a panel meeting, and 10 cognitive interviews, we administered the survey to 100 PAP device users (67% ≥60 years; 90% male). The items assessing machine control usability received the least favorable ratings. Twenty percent of respondents reported difficulty getting equipment ready for use, and 33 percent had difficulty cleaning equipment. The six multi-item scales had excellent internal consistency reliability (alpha ≥0.84) and item-rest correlations (≥0.39). This study provides initial support for the USE-PAP for measuring PAP device usability. Studies that include large samples are needed to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the USE-PAP. In addition, comparisons of USE-PAP responses with direct observations of PAP-related tasks and objectively measured PAP adherence are needed to fully evaluate the questionnaire. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Sleep Medicine 02/2015; 16(5). DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2015.01.019 · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 79% of ED patients present with pain, yet little is known regarding how unresolved pain affects patients' functional status. This prospective, descriptive, 7-day pilot-study investigated how unrelieved pain affects functional status. Participants self-entered demographic data at ED discharge while research-team members collected triage scores, pain intensity scores, pain treatments, pain reassessments, discharge pain intensities, and prescriptions. Seven-day pain diaries were completed. At follow-up participants completed four PROMIS questionnaires. We approached 96 patients at ED discharge enrolling 25 (26%); 12 (48%) completed the entire study; 64% were female, 19-66 years (38.12 ± 14.23). Pain intensity at discharge was 7.25 ± 1.3 (4-10). Pain intensity 24 hours after discharge was 5.71 ± 3.12 and 7 days later was 2.50 ± 1.35. Participants rated their health (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) as good (3.33 ± 0.99), and reported moderate fatigue (2.83 ± 0.58) (1 = none, 5 = very severe). T-Scores for Pain Behavior (60.5 ± 2.8), Pain Interference (66.6 ± 6.0), and Sleep Disturbance (56.5 ± 10.0) were worse than the general public. Patients are discharged with unrelieved pain affecting their lives. Research investigating pain assessment and treatment along with detailing patients' daily pain intensity and satisfaction, self-management of pain, and functional status is warranted. Demonstrating these relationships may lead to interventions designed to quickly alleviate decreased functional status so patients may return to their previous health status. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    International Emergency Nursing 01/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2014.12.002 · 0.72 Impact Factor