Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 06/2010; 33(6):781-92.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop an archive of self-report questions assessing sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments (SRI), to develop item banks from this archive, and to validate and calibrate the item banks using classic validation techniques and item response theory analyses in a sample of clinical and community participants.
Cross-sectional self-report study.
Academic medical center and participant homes.
One thousand nine hundred ninety-three adults recruited from an Internet polling sample and 259 adults recruited from medical, psychiatric, and sleep clinics.
This study was part of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System), a National Institutes of Health Roadmap initiative. Self-report item banks were developed through an iterative process of literature searches, collecting and sorting items, expert content review, qualitative patient research, and pilot testing. Internal consistency, convergent validity, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were examined in the resulting item banks. Factor analyses identified 2 preliminary item banks, sleep disturbance and SRI. Item response theory analyses and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 27 and 16 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by moderate to high correlations with existing scales and by significant differences in sleep disturbance and SRI scores between participants with and without sleep disorders.
The PROMIS sleep disturbance and SRI item banks have excellent measurement properties and may prove to be useful for assessing general aspects of sleep and SRI with various groups of patients and interventions.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on research standards for cLBP.
    Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 08/2014; 37(7). DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Because early life growth has long-lasting metabolic and behavioral consequences, intervention during this period of developmental plasticity may alter long-term obesity risk. While modifiable factors during infancy have been identified, until recently, preventive interventions had not been tested. The Intervention Nurses Starting Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT). Study is a longitudinal, randomized, controlled trial evaluating a responsive parenting intervention designed for the primary prevention of obesity. This “parenting” intervention is being compared with a home safety control among first-born infants and their parents. INSIGHT’s central hypothesis is that responsive parenting and specifically responsive feeding promotes self-regulation and shared parent–child responsibility for feeding, reducing subsequent risk for overeating and overweight. Methods/Design 316 first-time mothers and their full-term newborns were enrolled from one maternity ward. Two weeks following delivery, dyads were randomly assigned to the “parenting” or “safety” groups. Subsequently, research nurses conduct study visits for both groups consisting of home visits at infant age 3–4, 16, 28, and 40 weeks, followed by annual clinic-based visits at 1, 2, and 3 years. Both groups receive intervention components framed around four behavior states: Sleeping, Fussy, Alert and Calm, and Drowsy. The main study outcome is BMI z-score at age 3 years; additional outcomes include those related to patterns of infant weight gain, infant sleep hygiene and duration, maternal responsiveness and soothing strategies for infant/toddler distress and fussiness, maternal feeding style and infant dietary content and physical activity. Maternal outcomes related to weight status, diet, mental health, and parenting sense of competence are being collected. Infant temperament will be explored as a moderator of parenting effects, and blood is collected to obtain genetic predictors of weight status. Finally, second-born siblings of INSIGHT participants will be enrolled in an observation-only study to explore parenting differences between siblings, their effect on weight outcomes, and carryover effects of INSIGHT interventions to subsequent siblings. Discussion With increasing evidence suggesting the importance of early life experiences on long-term health trajectories, the INSIGHT trial has the ability to inform future obesity prevention efforts in clinical settings. Trial registration NCT01167270. Registered 21 July 2010.
    BMC Pediatrics 07/2014; 14(1):184. DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-14-184 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 79% of ED patients present with pain, yet little is known regarding how unresolved pain affects patients' functional status. This prospective, descriptive, 7-day pilot-study investigated how unrelieved pain affects functional status. Participants self-entered demographic data at ED discharge while research-team members collected triage scores, pain intensity scores, pain treatments, pain reassessments, discharge pain intensities, and prescriptions. Seven-day pain diaries were completed. At follow-up participants completed four PROMIS questionnaires. We approached 96 patients at ED discharge enrolling 25 (26%); 12 (48%) completed the entire study; 64% were female, 19-66 years (38.12 ± 14.23). Pain intensity at discharge was 7.25 ± 1.3 (4-10). Pain intensity 24 hours after discharge was 5.71 ± 3.12 and 7 days later was 2.50 ± 1.35. Participants rated their health (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) as good (3.33 ± 0.99), and reported moderate fatigue (2.83 ± 0.58) (1 = none, 5 = very severe). T-Scores for Pain Behavior (60.5 ± 2.8), Pain Interference (66.6 ± 6.0), and Sleep Disturbance (56.5 ± 10.0) were worse than the general public. Patients are discharged with unrelieved pain affecting their lives. Research investigating pain assessment and treatment along with detailing patients' daily pain intensity and satisfaction, self-management of pain, and functional status is warranted. Demonstrating these relationships may lead to interventions designed to quickly alleviate decreased functional status so patients may return to their previous health status. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Available from
May 19, 2014