Allergic contact dermatitis to propyl gallate and pentylene glycol in an emollient cream.

Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Dermatology Clinic, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Australasian Journal of Dermatology (Impact Factor: 0.98). 05/2010; 51(2):147-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00618.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A 62-year-old man, with a 20-year history of seborrhoeic dermatitis, presented with a worsening of his dermatitis. He had previously been demonstrated to be allergic to various topical corticosteroids, so he had been using an emollient cream (Sebclair), containing piroctone olamine and various anti-inflammatory substances, for 6 months, with good effect. Patch testing to the cream and its ingredients revealed positive reactions to both propyl gallate and pentylene glycol. A positive reaction to propylene glycol was also detected, whereas patch testing to butylene glycol was negative. Complete remission followed avoidance of the offending substances.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gallic acid esters or gallates are antioxidants used as preservatives in food and cosmetics. Few cases of gallates causing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) have been reported in the literature. We present a case report of a 42-year-old beauty therapist who presented with a swollen tongue. Patch testing was positive to dodecyl gallate, commonly reported as being present in edible oil and oily foods such as margarine. Our patient avoided foods presumed to contain gallates and at the 6-week review reported a substantial improvement in her tongue symptoms. We reviewed our database and found 16 (7%) definitely or possibly relevant reactions to dodecyl gallate, seven (15%) definitely or possibly relevant reactions to propyl gallate and six (3%) definitely or possibly relevant reactions to octyl gallate. Most reactions were attributed to margarine, moisturising cream and lipstick. These products are often mentioned in the literature as containing gallates; however, ingredient labelling and discussions with manufacturers made it difficult to establish whether they are currently present in foods. Ascertaining relevance for these reactions is not always possible.
    Australasian Journal of Dermatology 09/2012; 54(3). DOI:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00941.x · 0.98 Impact Factor