GSK-3 Promotes Conditional Association of CREB and Its Coactivators with MEIS1 to Facilitate HOX-Mediated Transcription and Oncogenesis

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Cancer cell (Impact Factor: 23.89). 06/2010; 17(6):597-608. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Acute leukemias induced by MLL chimeric oncoproteins are among the subset of cancers distinguished by a paradoxical dependence on GSK-3 kinase activity for sustained proliferation. We demonstrate here that GSK-3 maintains the MLL leukemia stem cell transcriptional program by promoting the conditional association of CREB and its coactivators TORC and CBP with homedomain protein MEIS1, a critical component of the MLL-subordinate program, which in turn facilitates HOX-mediated transcription and transformation. This mechanism also applies to hematopoietic cells transformed by other HOX genes, including CDX2, which is highly expressed in a majority of acute myeloid leukemias, thus providing a molecular approach based on GSK-3 inhibitory strategies to target HOX-associated transcription in a broad spectrum of leukemias.

Download full-text


Available from: Francesca Ficara, Mar 13, 2014
  • Source
    • "Tosedostat down regulated five of nine enriched genes in the V$E2F_01 promoter motif signature in HL-60 cells (acute promyelocytic leukemia) (Krige et al., 2008) where down regulation of MYC could impact a large number of TN enriched genes. The SB216763 inhibitor of GSK3Beta treatment of RS4;11 human leukemia cell line, down regulated 474 genes at least 1.5 fold that were significantly enriched for genes related to cell cycle and MYC-regulated genes (Wang et al., 2010). Knockout experiments of TLX and BMP2 indicate a down regulation of V$E2F_01, KTGGYRSGAA_UNKNOWN and V$E2F_Q3 enriched genes implicating them as possible therapeutic targets (Lee et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple negative (TN) breast cancers which lack expression of the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptors convey a poor prognosis due in part to a lack of targeted therapies. To identify viable targets for the treatment of TN disease, we have conducted a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on seven different breast cancer whole genome gene expression cohorts comparing TN vs. ER + HER2 - to identify consistently enriched genes that share a common promoter motif. The seven cohorts were profiled on three different genome expression platforms (Affymetrix, Illumina and RNAseq) consisting in total of 2088 samples with IHC metadata. GSEA identified enriched gene expression patterns in TN samples that share common promoter motifs associated with SOX9, E2F1, HIF1A, HMGA1, MYC BACH2, CEBPB, and GCNF/NR6A1. Unexpectedly, NR6A1 an orphan nuclear receptor normally expressed in germ cells of gonads is highly expressed in TN and ER + HER2 - samples making it an ideal drug target. With the increasing number of large sample size breast cancer cohorts, an exploratory analysis of genes that are consistently enriched in TN sharing common promoter motifs allows for the identification of possible therapeutic targets with extensive validation in patient derived data sets.
    06/2015; 4. DOI:10.1016/j.mgene.2015.04.002
  • Source
    • "While all of these leukemias are molecularly distinct and have different etiologies, it is curious to note the connection between Gsk-3 activity, DNA methylation, and Hoxa gene expression that is common to ALL, CLL, MLL, and AML. Recent mechanistic studies on MLL suggests that regulation of MEIS1 activity via Gsk-3-dependent control of CREB, TORC, and CBP could represent a common molecular link between these disparate cancers (Wang et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (Gsk-3) is a key regulator of multiple signal transduction pathways. Recently, we described a novel role for Gsk-3 in the regulation of DNA methylation at imprinted loci in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), suggesting that epigenetic changes regulated by Gsk-3 are likely an unrecognized facet of Gsk-3 signaling. Here, we extend our initial observation to the entire mouse genome by enriching for methylated DNA with the MethylMiner kit and performing next-generation sequencing (MBD-Seq) in wild-type and Gsk-3α(-/-);Gsk-3β(-/-) ESCs. Consistent with our previous data, we found that 77% of known imprinted loci have reduced DNA methylation in Gsk-3-deficient ESCs. More specifically, we unambiguously identified changes in DNA methylation within regions that have been confirmed to function as imprinting control regions (ICRs). In many cases, the reduced DNA methylation at imprinted loci in Gsk-3α(-/-);Gsk-3β(-/-) ESCs was accompanied by changes in gene expression as well. Furthermore, many of the Gsk-3-dependent differentially methylated regions (DMRs) are identical to the DMRs recently identified in uniparental ESCs. Our data demonstrate the importance of Gsk-3 activity in the maintenance of DNA methylation at a majority of the imprinted loci in ESCs, and emphasizes the importance for Gsk-3-mediated signal transduction on the epigenome. © 2015 by The American Society for Cell Biology.
    Molecular biology of the cell 04/2015; DOI:10.1091/mbc.E15-01-0013 · 5.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In contrast, the RA, GSK-3 and/or PKA pathways might act by means of Meis proteins to create an activating complex . In particular, RA induces Meis expression (Oulad-Abdelghani et al., 1997), while both PKA and GSK-3 signaling promotes CBP-mediated transcriptional activation by means of the Meis C-terminus (Huang et al., 2005; Goh et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010). Hence, the end result of the conversion process would be displacement of co-repressors and recruitment of coactivators . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hox genes encode transcription factors with important roles during embryogenesis and tissue differentiation. Genetic analyses initially demonstrated that interfering with Hox genes has profound effects on the specification of cell identity, suggesting that Hox proteins regulate very specific sets of target genes. However, subsequent biochemical analyses revealed that Hox proteins bind DNA with relatively low affinity and specificity. Furthermore, it became clear that a given Hox protein could activate or repress transcription depending on the context. A resolution to these paradoxes presented itself with the discovery that Hox proteins do not function in isolation, but interact with other factors in complexes. The first such "cofactors" were members of the Extradenticle/Pbx and Homothorax/Meis/Prep families. However, the list of Hox-interacting proteins has continued to grow, suggesting that Hox complexes contain many more components than initially thought. Additionally, the activities of the various components and the exact mechanisms whereby they modulate the activity of the complex remain puzzling. Here we review the various proteins known to participate in Hox complexes and discuss their likely functions. We also consider that Hox complexes of different compositions may have different activities and discuss mechanisms whereby Hox complexes may be switched between active and inactive states. Developmental Dynamics, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Developmental Dynamics 01/2014; 243(1). DOI:10.1002/dvdy.23997 · 2.67 Impact Factor
Show more