Using Pharmacy Data to Screen for Look-Alike, Sound-Alike Substitution Errors in Pediatric Prescriptions

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Academic pediatrics (Impact Factor: 2.01). 07/2010; 10(4):233-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.04.024
Source: PubMed


The aim of this study was to pilot test a screening approach to detect potential look-alike, sound-alike (LASA) errors in pediatric outpatient prescriptions.
Medicaid pharmacy claims from one state were reviewed. From a list of LASA drug pairs, we identified candidate pairs meeting the following criteria: 1) one drug was commonly prescribed in children; 2) the paired drug was uncommonly prescribed for children; and 3) both drugs were available as oral preparations only, resulting in 11 LASA pairs. We identified patients who usually received one drug in a pair, then presented with a first dispensing of the paired drug, representing a "screening alert" for potential LASA error. We determined a "true error" as any patient who triggered a screening alert, received only one dispensing of the paired drug in the subsequent 6 months, and had no diagnoses supporting the dispensing of the paired drug.
Among the 22 test drugs, there were 1 420 091 prescriptions to 173 005 subjects. There were 395 screening alerts generated, representing a screening alert frequency of 0.28 screening alerts per 1000 prescriptions. We identified 43 true LASA errors. In the dataset, the overall LASA error rate is estimated to be approximately 0.00003%, or 0.03 LASA errors per 1000 prescriptions.
Prescription dispensing patterns can be used to screen for LASA errors in pediatric prescriptions. The rates of pediatric LASA errors appear to be much lower than other types of pediatric medication errors and may be best addressed by automated processes.

1 Follower
54 Reads
  • Academic pediatrics 07/2010; 10(4):218-9. DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2010.05.003 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A Segurança do doente para além do erro médico ou do erro clínico O erro clínico, os efeitos adversos terapêuticos e a segurança dos doentes: uma análise baseada na evidência cientí¿ ca Segurança do doente: da teoria à prática clínica Erros e acidentes no bloco operatório: revisão do estado da arte Infecções associadas aos cuidados de saúde e segurança do doente Erro medicamentoso em cuidados de saúde primários e secundários: dimensão, causas e estratégias de prevenção Comunicação em saúde e a segurança do doente: problemas e desa¿ os Ergonomia hospitalar e segurança do doente: mais convergências que divergências A magnitude ¿ nanceira dos eventos adversos em hospitais no Brasil Perspectivas do Direito da Saúde em Segurança do Doente com base na experiência norte-americana Investigação e inovação em segurança do doente saúde pública Revista portuguesa de publicação semestral Volume temático Número 10 2010 ISSN 0870-9025 Portada RP Saude Publica vol tem.indd 1 15/12/10 16:39:24 Rev Port Saúde Pública. 2010;Vol Temat(10):89-95
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emphasis on participatory medicine requires that patients and consumers participate in tasks traditionally reserved for healthcare providers. This includes reading and comprehending medical documents, often but not necessarily in the context of interacting with Personal Health Records (PHRs). Research suggests that while giving patients access to medical documents has many benefits (e.g., improved patient-provider communication), lay people often have difficulty understanding medical information. Informatics can address the problem by developing tools that support comprehension; this requires in-depth understanding of the nature and causes of errors that lay people make when comprehending clinical documents. The objective of this study was to develop a classification scheme of comprehension errors, based on lay individuals' retellings of two documents containing clinical text: a description of a clinical trial and a typical office visit note. While not comprehensive, the scheme can serve as a foundation of further development of a taxonomy of patients' comprehension errors. Eighty participants, all healthy volunteers, read and retold two medical documents. A data-driven content analysis procedure was used to extract and classify retelling errors. The resulting hierarchical classification scheme contains nine categories and 23 subcategories. The most common error made by the participants involved incorrectly recalling brand names of medications. Other common errors included misunderstanding clinical concepts, misreporting the objective of a clinical research study and physician's findings during a patient's visit, and confusing and misspelling clinical terms. A combination of informatics support and health education is likely to improve the accuracy of lay comprehension of medical documents.
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics 08/2012; 45(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.07.012 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Show more