Socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in diabetes retinal screening

Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, UK.
Diabetic Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.12). 03/2010; 27(3):282-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02946.x
Source: PubMed


We aimed to quantify socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in diabetes retinal screening.
Data were analysed for the retinal screening programme for three South London boroughs for the 18-month period to February 2009. Sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) was defined as the occurrence of diabetic maculopathy, severe non-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Odds ratios were adjusted for sex, age group, duration and type of diabetes, self-reported ethnicity and deprivation quintile by participant postal code.
There were 76 351 records obtained but, after excluding duplicate and ineligible records, data were analysed for 59 495 records from 31 484 subjects. There were 7026 (22%) subjects called for appointments who were not screened in the period, with 24 458 (78%) having one or more screening episodes. Non-attendance for screening was highest in young adults aged 18-34 years (32%) and in those aged 85 years or greater (28%). In the most deprived quintile, non-attendance was 23% compared with 21% in the least deprived quintile [odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.61, P < 0.001]. There were 2819 (11.5%) participants with STDR, including 10.8% in the least deprived quintile and 12.2% in the most deprived quintile (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95-1.16, P = 0.196). Compared with white Europeans (9.4%), STDR was higher in Africans (15.2%) and African Caribbeans (14.7%), resulting from a higher frequency of diabetic maculopathy.
Socio-economic inequality in diabetes retinal screening may be smaller than reported in earlier studies. This study suggested an increased frequency of diabetic maculopathy among participants of African origins.

9 Reads
  • Source
    • "We have drawn together information across sectors to provide a comprehensive assessment of eye health services for Indigenous Australians. The study supports the notion that socioeconomic status, ethnicity and geography can all contribute to inequalities in eye health [22-25]. It highlights the role of differential access health services in disparities in eye health between Indigenous and other Australians. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: This project is a community-level study of equity of access to eye health services for Indigenous Australians. Methods: The project used data on eye health services from multiple sources including Medicare Australia, inpatient and outpatient data and the National Indigenous Eye Health Survey.The analysis focused on the extent to which access to eye health services varied at an area level according to the proportion of the population that was Indigenous (very low = 0-1.0%, low = 1.1-3.0%, low medium = 3.1-6.0%, high medium = 6.1-10.0%, high = 10.1-20.0%, very high = 20 + %). The analysis of health service utilisation also took into account age, remoteness and the Socioeconomic Indices for Areas (SEIFA). Results: The rate of eye exams provided in areas with very high Indigenous populations was two-thirds of the rate of eye exams for areas with very low indigenous populations. The cataract surgery rates in areas with high medium to very high Indigenous populations were less than half that reference areas. In over a third of communities with very high Indigenous populations the cataract surgery rate fell below the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines compared to a cataract surgery rate of 3% in areas with very low Indigenous populations. Conclusions: There remain serious disparities in access to eye health service in areas with high Indigenous populations. Addressing disparities requires a co-ordinated approach to improving Indigenous people's access to eye health services. More extensive take-up of existing Medicare provisions is an important step in this process. Along with improving access to health services, community education concerning the importance of eye health and the effectiveness of treatment might reduce reluctance to seek help.
    BMC Ophthalmology 09/2012; 12(1). DOI:10.1186/1471-2415-12-51 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We aimed to determine whether family practices' achievement of diabetes quality of care targets is associated with diabetic retinal disease in registered patients. Data for achievement of diabetes quality of care targets, including the proportion of patients with HbA1c < or = 7.5%, for 144 family practices in London UK, for the years 2004/5 to 2007/8, were linked to data from a population-based diabetes eye screening programme collected from September 2007 to February 2009. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, duration and type of diabetes, unadjusted diabetes prevalence, ethnicity and deprivation category. Data were analysed for 24,458 participants with one or more eye screening results in the period. There were 9,332 (38%) with any diabetic retinopathy and 2,819 (11.5%) with sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR), including 2,654 (10.9%) with maculopathy. Among participants registered at 13 family practices that were in the highest quartile for achievement of the HbA1c quality of care target for all four years of study, the relative odds of any diabetic retinopathy were 0.78 (0.69 to 0.88) P<0.001. For participants at 12 practices consistently in the lowest quartile of HbA1c achievement, the relative odds of any diabetic retinopathy were 1.16 (1.03 to 1.30), P = 0.015. In the highest achieving practices, the relative odds of maculopathy were 0.74 (0.62 to 0.89), P = 0.001 and STDR 0.77 (0.65 to 0.92), P = 0.004. The risk of diabetic retinopathy might be lower at family practices that consistently achieve highly on diabetes quality of care targets for HbA1c.
    PLoS ONE 04/2010; 5(4):e10424. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0010424 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the 5-year visual outcome associated with laser photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO), and to investigate the relationship between systemic factors and visual outcomes in a real-life setting. The mean annual visual outcomes and systemic parameters of 100 consecutive subjects with type 2 diabetes who underwent the first session of focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation for clinically significant macular oedema between 2003 and 2004 were collected retrospectively and compared with the outcomes of the laser arm of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCRN trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection with laser photocoagulation treatment for DMO). The primary outcome measures included the mean change in visual acuity (VA) in 5 years and the influence of systemic factors on final visual outcome. The mean change in VA at 5 years was -5.23 in a real-life setting for an inner city population. The 3-year outcome was inferior to the clinical trial results with more people gaining vision (≥15 letter gain) in the DRCRN group compared with this cohort (26 vs 9%). Furthermore, three times more patients lost vision (>15 letter loss) in the real-life setting of this cohort compared with the clinical trial results of the DRCRN group (27 vs 8%, respectively). The visual outcomes and the control of systemic factors of patients with DMO in this cohort were inferior to those recruited for the clinical trial involving the DRCRN group.
    Eye (London, England) 05/2011; 25(7):851-8; quiz 859. DOI:10.1038/eye.2011.102 · 2.08 Impact Factor
Show more