Brachial approach for coronary angiography and intervention: totally obsolete, or a feasible alternative when radial access is not possible? Ann Acad Med Singapore

Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore (Impact Factor: 1.15). 05/2010; 39(5):368-73.
Source: PubMed


This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of brachial arterial puncture for coronary procedures when radial access is not possible. Radial arterial approach is the usual option for coronary procedures in our hospital. Whenever radial access is not possible, the brachial approach is preferred instead of the femoral approach. As many clinicians considered percutaneous brachial coronary angiography as an obsolete and hazardous procedure, we carried out this study to compare the outcomes of the brachial approach to the femoral approach in our centre.
We retrospectively evaluated all cases of brachial artery puncture and femoral artery puncture in our centre from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2009 through a prospectively collected database and looked for all complications which occurred in both groups.
The femoral group had a slightly higher incidence of major complications--3 out of 121 cases (2.5%) in the femoral group and 1 out of 180 cases (0.6%) in the brachial group, even though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). There was also no difference between these 2 groups for minor complications: 8 patients (4.4%) in the brachial group and 6 patients (5%) in the femoral group developed haematoma that did not require any blood transfusion or surgery. There was no incidence of brachial artery thrombosis and no puncture-related neurological deficit documented in the brachial group. Conclusion: Brachial artery puncture and catheterisation may be a viable, safe and efficient alternative to the transfemoral approach in a centre that is experienced with the arm approach, when radial access is not possible.

Download full-text


Available from: Hwa Wooi Gan,
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty, while not new, is gaining momentum again as a viable alternative to the transfemoral approach. While technically it may have some challenges, there are significant benefits including reduced patient discomfort, improved time to ambulation, reduction in costs, and reduction in potentially life-threatening complications. The technique is not difficult to learn, and the equipment is similar to that used in more traditional approaches. To expand awareness of this method, this article discusses the history of the technique, reviews the data comparing it to the more widely used transfemoral technique, and discusses some of the experience at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, where this approach has been gaining popularity.
    Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) 07/2011; 24(3):205-9.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The selection of vascular access site is the first critical decision to be made when planning any endovascular procedure. The choice of access site is influenced by patient and procedural considerations, with the operator seeking to balance the benefits and risks unique to each access site. This chapter reviews transfemoral and transbrachial vascular access, two principle access sites used widely for endovascular therapies. Optimizing technique of access for any site has been shown to reduce the frequency of access site complications, which remain among the most common and serious adverse events following endovascular interventions. Use of consistent and meticulous access techniques as well as routine angiography of the femoral access site is recommended. Common vascular access site complications are reviewed, including access site bleeding, compromise of vessel wall integrity, and compromise of perfusion due to dissection or embolization. Unique anatomical considerations of brachial artery access that increase the potential for complications are reviewed, and recommendations for minimizing risks for this access site are provided.
    Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions, 01/2013: pages 379-392; , ISBN: 978-3-642-27675-0

  • Kardiologia polska 06/2013; 71(5):512-516. DOI:10.5603/KP.2013.0100 · 0.54 Impact Factor
Show more