Perceptions of informed decision making about cancer screening in a diverse primary care population

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 1.17). 06/2010; 42(6):421-7.
Source: PubMed


Our objective was to describe primary care patients' perceptions of informed and shared decision making about cancer screening tests in a diverse sample.
We administered a 33-item survey to 467 women and 257 men aged 50 years and older from seven practices in a family medicine practice-based research network. We used ordered logistic regression to assess the relationship between gender, race, education, marital status, and self-rated health with measures of patient-centered care relating to cancer screening tests, controlling for practice site.
Men had greater odds than women of reporting they did not know the benefits of cancer screening (1.46, 95% CI=1.08, 1.99). Compared to white respondents, black respondents reported greater odds of not knowing the benefits (1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.36) and risks (1.38, 95% CI=1.00, 1.90) of cancer screening, of not making informed choices (1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.07), and that their doctor did not give them some control over their cancer screening tests (1.57, 95% CI=1.12, 2.20). Low education level was also associated with lower perceptions of informed decision making.
Patients with male sex, non-white race, and low education level reported more uncertainty about cancer screening tests and less patient-centered care.

Download full-text


Available from: C Madeline Mitchell, Feb 04, 2014
17 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both sexes are at different risks for cancers and gender-dependent fears and barriers might influence their attitude towards screening. The aim of the present study was to assess gender issues in demographic variables which could influence the use of screening examinations. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess data of 513 Austrians, with urban and rural location of residence, aged 35-65 years. An elderly age group was additionally assessed in the urban region. Women of both age groups showed lower screening rates for bowel cancer. Living in partnership was predictive for breast cancer screening in females, whereas higher educational level was negatively associated with PSA screening in younger men. Additionally, increasing age was associated with less screening for breast and cervix cancer in older women. There is evidence for gender-related differences in the attitude towards screening in Austria. Different socio-demographic variables might be responsible.
    Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 03/2011; 161(5-6):143-8. DOI:10.1007/s10354-011-0867-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework to guide research on shared decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among persons at average risk and their providers. METHODS: Based upon a comprehensive review of empirical literature and relevant theories, a conceptual framework was developed that incorporated patient characteristics, cultural beliefs, provider/health care system variables, health belief/knowledge/stage of adoption variables, and shared decision-making between patients and providers that may predict behavior. Relationships among concepts in the framework, shared decision-making process and outcomes, and CRC screening behavior were proposed. Directions for future research were presented. RESULTS: Many of the concepts in the proposed framework have been examined in prior research. However, these elements have not been combined previously to explain shared decision-making about CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to test the proposed relationships and hypotheses and to refine the framework. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from future research guided by the proposed framework may inform clinical practice to facilitate shared decision-making about CRC screening.
    Patient Education and Counseling 02/2013; 91(3). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.015 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current breast cancer screening guidelines promote the use of shared decision making for women younger than 50 years of age, yet their effect on mammography utilization is largely unknown. This study aimed to examine the effect of two elements of shared decision making on the use of mammogram screening: patient-perceived choice and patient–provider communication. Data were obtained from HINTS 4, a nationally representative survey of the U.S. population, administered from 2011 to 2013. Choice was measured with the question ‘‘Has a doctor ever told you that you could choose whether or not to have a mammogram?’’ Communication was measured using a 7-item scale (range: 7–28; higher scores denote better communication). Binary logistic regression models assessed the effect of patient choice and communication on ever having a mammogram using weighted sample data. The sample included 1,085 women younger than 50 years of age: 31% of women perceived having a choice to undergo mammography. The mean patient–provider communication score was 22.8. Those who thought they were given a choice regarding mammography were more likely to have a mammogram relative to those who did not think a choice was given by the provider. Patient–provider communication had no significant association with mammography utilization. Patient perceived choice, but not patient-provider communication, is positively associated with mammography utilization in women younger than 50 years of age.
    Journal of Health Communication 07/2015; 20(9). DOI:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018628 · 1.61 Impact Factor