Article

Perceptions of informed decision making about cancer screening in a diverse primary care population.

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 0.85). 06/2010; 42(6):421-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Our objective was to describe primary care patients' perceptions of informed and shared decision making about cancer screening tests in a diverse sample.
We administered a 33-item survey to 467 women and 257 men aged 50 years and older from seven practices in a family medicine practice-based research network. We used ordered logistic regression to assess the relationship between gender, race, education, marital status, and self-rated health with measures of patient-centered care relating to cancer screening tests, controlling for practice site.
Men had greater odds than women of reporting they did not know the benefits of cancer screening (1.46, 95% CI=1.08, 1.99). Compared to white respondents, black respondents reported greater odds of not knowing the benefits (1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.36) and risks (1.38, 95% CI=1.00, 1.90) of cancer screening, of not making informed choices (1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.07), and that their doctor did not give them some control over their cancer screening tests (1.57, 95% CI=1.12, 2.20). Low education level was also associated with lower perceptions of informed decision making.
Patients with male sex, non-white race, and low education level reported more uncertainty about cancer screening tests and less patient-centered care.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
112 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both sexes are at different risks for cancers and gender-dependent fears and barriers might influence their attitude towards screening. The aim of the present study was to assess gender issues in demographic variables which could influence the use of screening examinations. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess data of 513 Austrians, with urban and rural location of residence, aged 35-65 years. An elderly age group was additionally assessed in the urban region. Women of both age groups showed lower screening rates for bowel cancer. Living in partnership was predictive for breast cancer screening in females, whereas higher educational level was negatively associated with PSA screening in younger men. Additionally, increasing age was associated with less screening for breast and cervix cancer in older women. There is evidence for gender-related differences in the attitude towards screening in Austria. Different socio-demographic variables might be responsible.
    Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 03/2011; 161(5-6):143-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework to guide research on shared decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among persons at average risk and their providers. METHODS: Based upon a comprehensive review of empirical literature and relevant theories, a conceptual framework was developed that incorporated patient characteristics, cultural beliefs, provider/health care system variables, health belief/knowledge/stage of adoption variables, and shared decision-making between patients and providers that may predict behavior. Relationships among concepts in the framework, shared decision-making process and outcomes, and CRC screening behavior were proposed. Directions for future research were presented. RESULTS: Many of the concepts in the proposed framework have been examined in prior research. However, these elements have not been combined previously to explain shared decision-making about CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to test the proposed relationships and hypotheses and to refine the framework. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from future research guided by the proposed framework may inform clinical practice to facilitate shared decision-making about CRC screening.
    Patient Education and Counseling 02/2013; · 2.60 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
19 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014