Article

Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Part 2-Nonventilatory Strategies

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, 506 Sixth St, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 06/2010; 137(6):1437-48. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-2416
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT ARDS is characterized by hypoxemic respiratory failure, which can be refractory and life-threatening. Modifications to traditional mechanical ventilation and nontraditional modes of ventilation are discussed in Part 1 of this two-part series. In this second article, we examine nonventilatory strategies that can influence oxygenation, with particular emphasis on their role in rescue from severe hypoxemia. A literature search was conducted and a narrative review written to summarize the use of adjunctive, nonventilatory interventions intended to improve oxygenation in ARDS. Several adjunctive interventions have been demonstrated to rapidly ameliorate severe hypoxemia in many patients with severe ARDS and therefore may be suitable as rescue therapy for hypoxemia that is refractory to prior optimization of mechanical ventilation. These include neuromuscular blockade, inhaled vasoactive agents, prone positioning, and extracorporeal life support. Although these interventions have been linked to physiologic improvement, including relief from severe hypoxemia, and some are associated with outcome benefits, such as shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, demonstration of survival benefit has been rare in clinical trials. Furthermore, some of these nonventilatory interventions carry additional risks and/or high cost; thus, when used as rescue therapy for hypoxemia, it is important that they be demonstrated to yield clinically significant improvement in gas exchange, which should be periodically reassessed. Additionally, various management strategies can produce a more gradual improvement in oxygenation in ARDS, such as conservative fluid management, intravenous corticosteroids, and nutritional modification. Although improvement in oxygenation has been reported with such strategies, demonstration of additional beneficial outcomes, such as reduced duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU length of stay, or improved survival in randomized controlled trials, as well as consideration of potential adverse effects should guide decisions on their use. Various nonventilatory interventions can positively impact oxygenation as well as outcomes of ARDS. These interventions may be considered for use, particularly for cases of refractory severe hypoxemia, with proper appreciation of potential costs and adverse effects.

3 Followers
 · 
142 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite advances in treatment, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a common cause of respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support and is associated with significantly high rates of morbidity and mortality. To date, the only treatment shown to increase survival rate in patients with ARDS is the use of supportive mechanical ventilation using low tidal volumes. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a therapy that has been used in severe cases of ARDS when patients fail to improve with traditional management. Recent literature shows varying mortality rates for the use of ECMO for ARDS; however, the literature suggests that transfer of patients to an ECMO center for treatment using specific criteria and indications may improve outcomes. Further research is needed regarding the timing of the initiation of ECMO, standardization of therapy, and which type of ECMO reduces morbidity and mortality rates in patients with ARDS.
    AACN Advanced Critical Care 01/2013; 24(2):149-68. DOI:10.1097/NCI.0b013e31828a09ff
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proper Orthogonal Projection - Multiple signal classification (POP-MUSIC) is introduced. Two spectral estimates are derived using geometrical approach based on POP-MUSIC which appear to be the counterparts of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) spectral estimate and Linear Prediction (LP) spectral estimate. POP-MUSIC based on linear prediction (POP-MUSIC-LP) provides a superior resolution compared to POP-MUSIC based on maximum likelihood (POP-MUSIC-ML), and this is justified mathematically. Quantitative measures such as degrading factor due to spurious peaks (F) and sharpness factor (Y) are introduced to facilitate the comparative performance of the spectral estimates. A systolic array structure which is suitable for VLSI implementation is given for adaptive estimation of the cross spectral density matrix and the POP-MUSIC spectral estimation. Computer simulation is presented.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation, which has demonstrated potential benefits in trauma patients. We therefore sought to compare relevant pulmonary data and safety outcomes of this modality to the recommendations of the Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Patients admitted after traumatic injury requiring mechanical ventilation were randomized under a 72-hour waiver of consent to a respiratory protocol for APRV or low tidal volume ventilation (LOVT). Data were collected regarding demographics, Injury Severity Score, oxygenation, ventilation, airway pressure, failure of modality, tracheostomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator days, length of stay (LOS), pneumothorax, and mortality. Sixty-three patients were enrolled during a 21-month period ending in February 2006. Thirty-one patients were assigned to APRV and 32 to LOVT. Patients were well matched for demographic variables with no differences between groups. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was higher for APRV than LOVT (20.5 ± 5.35 vs. 16.9 ± 7.17) with a p value = 0.027. Outcome variables showed no differences between APRV and LOVT for ventilator days (10.49 days ± 7.23 days vs. 8.00 days ± 4.01 days), ICU LOS (16.47 days ± 12.83 days vs. 14.18 days ± 13.26 days), pneumothorax (0% vs. 3.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia per patient (1.00 ± 0.86 vs. 0.56 ± 0.67), percent receiving tracheostomy (61.3% vs. 65.6%), percent failure of modality (12.9% vs. 15.6%), or percent mortality (6.45% vs. 6.25%). For patients sustaining significant trauma requiring mechanical ventilation for greater than 72 hours, APRV seems to have a similar safety profile as the LOVT. Trends for APRV patients to have increased ventilator days, ICU LOS, and ventilator-associated pneumonia may be explained by initial worse physiologic derangement demonstrated by higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores.
    The Journal of trauma 09/2010; 69(3):501-10; discussion 511. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e75961 · 2.96 Impact Factor
Show more