Validity and Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multicenter, International Study

University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, 48109-5340, USA.
Arthritis care & research 11/2010; 62(11):1569-77. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20274
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Millions of patients experience the disabling hand manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet few hand-specific instruments are validated in this population. Our objective was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) in patients with RA.
At enrollment and at 6 months, 128 RA patients with severe subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joints completed the MHQ, a 37-item questionnaire with 6 domains: function, activities of daily living (ADL), pain, work, aesthetics, and satisfaction. Reliability was measured using Spearman's correlation coefficients between time periods. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was measured by correlating MHQ responses with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2). Responsiveness was measured by calculating standardized response means (SRMs) between time periods.
The MHQ demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha scores were high for ADL (α = 0.90), function (α = 0.87), aesthetics (α = 0.79), and satisfaction (α = 0.89), indicating redundancy. The MHQ correlated well with AIMS2 responses. Function (r = -0.63), ADL (r = -0.77), work (r = -0.64), pain (r = 0.59), and summary score (r = -0.74) were correlated with the physical domain. Affect was correlated with ADL (r = -0.47), work (r = -0.47), pain (r = 0.48), and summary score (r = -0.53). Responsiveness was excellent among arthroplasty patients in function (SRM 1.42), ADL (SRM 0.89), aesthetics (SRM 1.23), satisfaction (SRM 1.76), and summary score (SRM 1.61).
The MHQ is easily administered, reliable, and valid to measure rheumatoid hand function, and can be used to measure outcomes in rheumatic hand disease.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is a concept initiated by the Institute of Medicine and financially supported by the federal government. The primary objective of CER is to improve decision making in medicine. This research is intended to evaluate the effectiveness, benefits, and harmful effects of alternative interventions. CER studies are commonly large, simple, observational, and conducted using electronic databases. To date, there is little comparative effectiveness evidence within hand surgery to guide therapeutic decisions. To draw conclusions on effectiveness through electronic health records, databases must contain clinical information and outcomes relevant to hand surgery interventions, such as patient-related outcomes.
    Hand Clinics 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2014.04.001 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Disability ratings after finger amputations are based on anatomical injury according to the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. These ratings determine disability and compensation, without considering validated outcomes measures. The authors hypothesize that patient-reported outcomes reflect function and health-related quality of life after traumatic finger amputations, and that Guides scoring does not accurately rate postamputation disability.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 11/2014; 134(5):746e-55e. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000591 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To evaluate the effects of preoperative anxiety and catastrophic pain ideation on perceived disability and objective measures after distal radius fracture surgery. Methods A total of 121 patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar plate fixation were enrolled. The wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and perceived disability as measured by the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) score were assessed 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. To evaluate psychological factors related to pain, catastrophic pain ideation was measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and pain anxiety was measured using the Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS). Then relative contributions of pain anxiety and catastrophic pain ideation and other clinical parameters to functional recovery in terms of grip strength, ROM, and MHQ score were assessed. Results An increase in the PCS score was associated with the wrist ROM and grip strength only at week 4, whereas an increase in the PASS score was associated with the wrist ROM at week 4 and grip strength at weeks 4 and 12. According to a multivariate regression analysis, an increase in the PCS score was associated with a decrease in grip strength, ROM, and MHQ score at week 4; and an increase in the PASS score was associated with a decrease in grip strength, ROM, and MHQ score at week 4 and grip strength and MHQ score at week 12. At week 24, only age and fracture severity were associated with the MHQ score. In addition, age was associated with grip strength and fracture type was associated with ROM. Conclusions Preoperative PCS and PASS were significantly associated with delayed recovery as evidenced by scores on both objective and subjective measures of function. Given these relationships, it becomes important to assess preoperative PCS and PASS and address issues for patients at risk with brief psychosocial intervention early in the recovery process. Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic II.
    The Journal Of Hand Surgery 10/2014; 39(11). DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.007 · 1.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jan 27, 2015