A Simplified Lateral Canthopexy Technique

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas, USA.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.99). 06/2010; 125(6):248e-9e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d45d19
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Michael A. Lypka, Jun 09, 2014
174 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lower blepharoplasty is a cornerstone in facial rejuvenation and improvement. Despite its popularity, several adverse effects have been described; of these, postsurgical eyelid displacement, with its aesthetic and functional consequences, is one of the more frequent complications. The tarsal sling procedure is a simplified canthopexy consisting in the fixation of the lateral portion of the septum-the canthal ligament-to the orbital wall periosteum.The aim of the current research is to demonstrate how the tarsal sling technique is effective in the prevention of lower lid malpositioning.A retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive healthy individuals was carried out. In group 1, 20 patients underwent standard blepharoplasty; in group 2, blepharoplasty was associated to the tarsal sling canthopexy. Pre- and postsurgical position of the lower eyelid margin was compared through photographic measurements at 5 time points and statistical analysis performed. Group 1 patients evidenced an increased distance between the interpupillary line and the lateral aspect of the lower lid margin. A progressive spontaneous improvement (reduction in scleral exposition) was detected. Patients who underwent the tarsal sling procedure (group 2) reported a postoperative overcorrection of scleral appearance. Two years postsurgery, progressive relapse occurred, but the lower eyelid did not reach presurgical values and maintained a slight degree of overcorrection.Tarsal sling is an easy, fast, and efficacious procedure to prevent eyelid displacement in lower blepharoplasty. Its routine use is a tool to assure further support to lower lids in the younger patients or when lid laxity is absent during presurgical examination.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 06/2015; 26(4):e339-42. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001801 · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ameloblastoma, a benign neoplasm derived from odontogenic epithelium, is an aggressive and locally invasive tumor. It represents 11% of all odontogenic tumors and 1% of all oral odontogenic epithelial tumors. In this case report, a 20-month-old boy was referred to our clinic with complaint of collapse in his symphysis region of the mandible. Radiographic examination revealed unilocular radiolucency in this region. The lesion was enucleated with 1 tooth germ under general anesthesia and diagnosed as mural unicystic ameloblastoma by histopathologic examination. After the surgery, complete healing was obtained clinically and radiographically. No sign of recurrence has been seen during the follow-up period of 4.5 years. To our knowledge, this was the second youngest case of ameloblastoma in the English literature. However, it is the youngest case of ameloblastoma that occurred in an infant boy.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 06/2015; 26(4):e297-9. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001645 · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This guideline for care of children with craniosynostosis was developed by a national working group with representatives of 11 matrix societies of specialties and the national patients' society. All medical aspects of care for nonsyndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis are included, as well as the social and psychologic impact for the patient and their parents. Managerial aspects are incorporated as well, such as organizing a timely referral to the craniofacial center, requirements for a dedicated craniofacial center, and centralization of this specialized care. The conclusions and recommendations within this document are founded on the available literature, with a grading of the level of evidence, thereby highlighting the areas of care that are in need of high-quality research. The development of this guideline was made possible by an educational grant of the Dutch Order of Medical Specialists. The development of this guideline was supported by an educational grant of the Dutch Order of Medical Specialists.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 09/2015; 26(6):1735-807. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000002016 · 0.68 Impact Factor