Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula

Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Gleueler Str. 50, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Brain Structure and Function (Impact Factor: 5.62). 06/2010; 214(5-6):629-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-010-0261-1
Source: PubMed


To detect erroneous action outcomes is necessary for flexible adjustments and therefore a prerequisite of adaptive, goal-directed behavior. While performance monitoring has been studied intensively over two decades and a vast amount of knowledge on its functional neuroanatomy has been gathered, much less is known about conscious error perception, often referred to as error awareness. Here, we review and discuss the conditions under which error awareness occurs, its neural correlates and underlying functional neuroanatomy. We focus specifically on the anterior insula, which has been shown to be (a) reliably activated during performance monitoring and (b) modulated by error awareness. Anterior insular activity appears to be closely related to autonomic responses associated with consciously perceived errors, although the causality and directions of these relationships still needs to be unraveled. We discuss the role of the anterior insula in generating versus perceiving autonomic responses and as a key player in balancing effortful task-related and resting-state activity. We suggest that errors elicit reactions highly reminiscent of an orienting response and may thus induce the autonomic arousal needed to recruit the required mental and physical resources. We discuss the role of norepinephrine activity in eliciting sufficiently strong central and autonomic nervous responses enabling the necessary adaptation as well as conscious error perception.

Download full-text


Available from: K. Richard Ridderinkhof,
    • "De Bruijn et al., 2009; Koban et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2014) errors. In line with its role in interoceptive awareness (Critchley et al., 2004; Craig, 2009; Ullsperger et al., 2010), it has been suggested that the role of the AI is to signal the affective consequences of intentional actions (Brass and Haggard, 2010). Interestingly, evidence linking the AI to the simulation of vicarious emotions (Wicker et al., 2003) and vicarious pain (Singer et al., 2004; Lamm et al., 2011) suggests that it may not only evaluate the consequences of an action for oneself, but also for others (Koban et al., 2013; Koban and Pourtois, 2014). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research on error observation has focused predominantly on situations in which individuals are passive observers of errors. In daily life, however, we are often jointly responsible for the mistakes of others. In the current study, we examined how information on agency is integrated in the error observation network. It was found that activation in the anterior insula but not in the posterior medial frontal cortex or lateral prefrontal cortex differentiates between observed errors for which we are partly responsible or not. Interestingly, the activation pattern of the AI was mirrored by feelings of guilt and shame. These results suggest that the anterior insula is crucially involved in evaluating the consequences of our actions for other persons. Consequently, this region may be thought of as critical in guiding social behavior.
    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 09/2015; DOI:10.1093/scan/nsv120 · 7.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Much like the Pe, cEMG following errors could signal the emergence of error awareness or represent orienting towards errors. Further, if error awareness emerges as a result of the accumulation of error-related information (Ullsperger et al., 2010), error-related cEMG could reflect early affective or motivational processes that contribute to this compound error signal. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emerging research in social and affective neuroscience has implicated a role for affect and motivation in performance-monitoring and cognitive control. No study, however, has investigated whether facial electromyography (EMG) over the corrugator supercilii—a measure associated with negative affect and the exertion of effort—is related to neural performance monitoring. Here, we explored these potential relationships by simultaneously measuring the error-related negativity (ERN), error positivity (Pe), and facial EMG over the corrugator supercilii muscle during a punished, inhibitory control task. We found evidence for increased facial EMG activity over the corrugator immediately following error responses, and this activity was related to the Pe for both between- and within-subject analyses. These results are consistent with the idea that early, avoidance-motivated processes are associated with performance monitoring, and that such processes may also be related to orienting towards errors, the emergence of error awareness, or both.
    Psychophysiology 09/2015; DOI:10.1111/psyp.12556 · 3.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Indeed, it is in particular the late Pe component (around 300–600 ms after error commission) which shows enhanced amplitudes for aware compared to unaware errors (Endrass, et al., 2007). The late Pe component has been hypothesized to originate from inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula (Ullsperger, et al., 2010). The current study focused on the late Pe component. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent research suggests that not only the dopamine neurotransmitter system but also the endogenous opioid system is involved in performance monitoring and the generation of prediction error signals. Therefore, the current study investigated the potential link between the functional opioid peptide prodynorphin (PDYN) 68bp VNTR genetic polymorphism and neuronal correlates of performance monitoring. To this end, forty-seven healthy participants genotyped for this polymorphism, related to high-, intermediate-, and low-expression levels of PDYN, performed a choice-reaction task while their electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. On the ehavioural level, no differences between the three PDYN groups could be observed. EEG data, however, showed significant differences. High PDYN expression individuals showed heightened neural error processing indicated by higher ERN amplitudes, compared to intermediate and low expression individuals. Later stages of error processing, indexed by late Pe amplitudes, and stimulus-driven conflict processing, indexed by N2 amplitudes, were not affected by PDYN genotype. The current results corroborate the notion of an indirect effect of endogenous opioids on performance monitoring, probably mediated by the mesencephalic dopamine system. Overall, enhanced ERN amplitudes suggest a hyper-active performance monitoring system in high PDYN expression individuals, and this might also be an indicator of a higher risk for internalizing disorders. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Neuropsychologia 09/2015; 77. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.028 · 3.30 Impact Factor
Show more