Sexual violence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been linked to increased reports of distress and pain during the pelvic examination. Efforts to more fully characterize these reactions and identify core factors (i.e., beliefs about the examination) that may influence these reactions are warranted.
This descriptive, cross-sectional study examines the relationship between sexual violence, PTSD, and women's negative reactions to the pelvic examination. Additional analyses highlight how maladaptive beliefs about the safety, necessity, and utility of the pelvic examination may contribute to these reactions. Materials and
A total of 165 eligible women veterans were identified via medical record review and mailed a survey that assessed: (1) background information; (2) history of sexual violence; (3) current symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder; (4) fear, embarrassment, distress, and pain during the pelvic examination; and (5) core beliefs about the examination. Ninety women (55% response rate) completed the survey.
Women with both sexual violence and PTSD reported the highest levels of examination related fear: chi(2) = 18.8, p < .001; embarrassment: chi(2) = 21.2, p < .001; and distress: chi(2) = 18.2, p < .001. Beliefs that the examination was unnecessary or unsafe or not useful were more commonly reported in this group and were associated with higher levels of examination-related fear and embarrassment.
Women with sexual violence and PTSD find the pelvic examination distressing, embarrassing, and frightening. Efforts to develop interventions to help reduce distress during the examination are warranted.
"In spite of these limitations, this was the first study obtaining an inventory of SA in colonoscopy patients, identifying their needs regarding the colonoscopic procedure and comparing experienced discomfort during colonoscopy between patients with and without SA. Our results were consistent with prior research showing that female patients with a history of SA reported more discomfort and anxiety during gynecological examination , –. And confirmed the link between sexual abuse, abdominal pain and multiple GI-complaints already found in the early nineties by Drossman et al. which has been verified in many studies afterwards , , . "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Sexual abuse has been linked to strong effects on gastrointestinal health. Colonoscopy can provoke intense emotional reactions in patients with a sexual abuse history and may lead to avoidance of endoscopic procedures.
To determine whether care around colonoscopy needs adjustment for patients with sexual abuse experience, thereby exploring targets for the improvement of care around colonoscopic procedures.
Questionnaires were mailed to patients (n = 1419) from two centers within 11 months after colonoscopy. Differences in experience of the colonoscopy between patients with and without a sexual abuse history were assessed and patients' views regarding physicians' inquiry about sexual abuse and care around endoscopic procedures were obtained.
A total of 768 questionnaires were analyzed. The prevalence of sexual abuse was 3.9% in male and 9.5% in female patients. Patients born in a non-western country reported more sexual abuse (14.9%) than those born in a western country (6.3%; p = 0.008). Discomfort during colonoscopy was indicated on a scale from 0 to 10, mean distress score of patients with sexual abuse was 4.8(±3.47) compared to 3.5(±3.11) in patients without a sexual abuse history (p = 0.007). Abdominal pain was a predictor for higher distress during colonoscopy (β = -0.019 (SE = 0.008); p = 0.02, as well as the number of complaints indicated as reason for colonoscopy (β = 0.738 (SE = 0.276); p = 0.008). Of patients with sexual abuse experience, 53.8% believed gastroenterologists should ask about it, 43.4% said deeper sedation during colonoscopy would diminish the distress.
Sexual abuse is prevalent in patients presenting for colonoscopy. Patients with a sexual abuse history experience more distress during the procedure and indicate that extra attention around and during colonoscopy may diminish this distress.
PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(1):e85034. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0085034 · 3.23 Impact Factor
"Additionally, many VHA providers have not been routinely caring for women during their VHA careers and lack the ability to provide gender-specific services (i.e., care that is dictated by gender, such as pelvic examinations and pap smears). Moreover, the prevalence of comorbid interpersonal trauma among women Veteran patients also creates challenges for delivery of comprehensive care as routine gender-specific examinations and procedures, such as pelvic exams, are often more difficult for these patients (Weitlauf et al. 2010). As a result, VHA has launched large-scale training programs to expand the capacity of providers to deliver comprehensive gender-specific care to women Veterans. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Female Veterans experience intimate partner violence (IPV) at alarming rates. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) requires foundational research to guide the development of policy and programs to detect IPV among women Veterans and provide interventions. This pilot study reports findings from in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with 12 VHA primary care providers treating female Veterans in the New England region. Although most providers indicated that they were not currently routinely screening for IPV, they expressed positive attitudes and beliefs about screening in VHA primary care settings. Themes also included the importance of a comprehensive health care response to IPV, such as interdisciplinary coordination of care and team-based approaches to detection and intervention. Barriers to routine screening were identified, as well as recommendations for training programs and clinical tools to inform the successful implementation of a standardized IPV screening and response program in VHA. Although preliminary, these findings represent an initial step in an essential line of research.
Journal of Family Violence 11/2013; 28(8). DOI:10.1007/s10896-013-9544-7 · 1.17 Impact Factor
"Socially deprived neighborhoods in the U.S. are often affected by both criminal violence and residential instability . It is possible that women are particularly vulnerable to stressors such as sexual violence . Consistent with this hypothesis are the results of a 2011 U.S. study, which found that violence was associated with women's cervical cancer morbidity . "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To analyze whether there is an association between neighborhood deprivation and cervical cancer morbidity and mortality, beyond individual level characteristics.
The entire Swedish population aged 25 to 74, a total of 1.9million women, were followed from January 1, 1990, until hospital admission due to cervical cancer during the study period, or the end of the study on December 31, 2008. Multilevel logistic regression was used in the analysis with individual level characteristics (age, marital status, family income, education, immigration status, urban/rural status, mobility, comorbidities, parities, and number of partners) at the first level and level of neighborhood deprivation at the second level. Neighborhood deprivation was measured at small area market statistics level by the use of an index.
There was a strong association between level of neighborhood deprivation and cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. In the full model, which took account of the individual level characteristics, the risks of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality were 1.25 and 1.36, respectively, in the most deprived neighborhoods. The between neighborhood variance was over twice the standard error, indicating significant differences in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality between neighborhoods.
This study is the largest to date of the influences of neighborhood deprivation on cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. The results suggest that neighborhood characteristics affect cervical cancer morbidity and mortality independently of individual level sociodemographic characteristics. Both individual and neighborhood level approaches are important in health care policies.
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.