Article

Neointimal coverage on drug-eluting stent struts crossing side-branch vessels using optical coherence tomography.

Division of Cardiology, Yonsei Cardiovascular Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
The American journal of cardiology (Impact Factor: 3.58). 06/2010; 105(11):1565-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The status of neointimal coverage on the drug-eluting stent (DES) struts, which are placed across the side-branch vessels, remains unclear. The degree of neointimal coverage of stent struts crossing the side-branch vessel was evaluated according to the different types of DESs. Follow-up optical coherence tomography images at 9.3 months after the index procedure were identified in 51 patients who had undergone DES (sirolimus-eluting stents [SESs] in 22 patients, paclitaxel-eluting stents [PESs] in 15, and zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZESs] in 14) implantation with crossover of the side-branch vessels (size >2.0 mm). The enrolled patients were classified as a covered group if every unapposed strut showed neointimal coverage or an uncovered group if any struts lacked neointimal coverage. The neointimal hyperplasia thickness was also measured. The number of patients in the covered group was 15 (29%), with 36 patients in the uncovered group. Significant differences were found in the proportion of the covered group among the 3 DES types (6 [27%] of 22 with SESs, 1 [7%] of 15 with PESs, and 8 [57%] of 14 with ZESs; p = 0.011). The percentage of neointimal coverage in the overall stent struts was also significantly different among the 3 DES types (65% of 356 struts, 20% of 165 struts, and 83% of 143 struts for the SESs, PESs, and ZESs, respectively; p<0.001). The neointimal hyperplasia thickness in the PES group was significantly smaller than those of the ZES and SES groups (0.02 +/- 0.02 mm vs 0.08 +/- 0.06 mm and 0.04 +/- 0.03 mm, respectively; p = 0.002). In conclusion, different patterns of neointimal coverage of the stent struts crossing the side branch vessels were observed according to the type of DES.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
63 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In the treatment of bifurcation lesions, routine stenting of both branches has thus far failed to demonstrate a clear clinical advantage over a provisional one-stent strategy. On the other hand, large scale data evaluating different stent types for clinical outcomes after one-stent treatment with final kissing inflation (FKI) of bifurcation lesions is also limited. This prospective study evaluated the clinical and angiographic outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in single crossover main branch stenting followed by FKI in patients with bifurcation lesions. METHODS: We randomized 800 patients with single bifurcation lesions to PES (n=400) and SES (n=400) groups. RESULTS: Crossover rates to the two-stent strategy were low in both groups (PES 1.5%, SES 2.8%; p=0.23). At 1year, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of this study, target lesion revascularization rate (PES 3.8%, SES 3.2%, hazard ratio 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 1.76; p=0.62). Stent thrombosis occurred in only 1 case in the SES group after 282days. At 9months, a total of 593 patients underwent quantitative coronary measurement. The main branch restenosis rate in the PES group was significantly higher than that of the SES group (PES 12.2%, SES 5.5%; p=0.004), however both groups exhibited similar high side branch restenosis rates (PES 17.2%, SES 19.3%; p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bifurcation lesions, a single stent strategy using PES and SES with FKI indicated similar 1year clinical outcomes and safety profiles.
    International journal of cardiology 11/2011; · 7.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) has not been well evaluated. Thus, we compared neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions among four DES using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: Eight-month follow-up OCT was performed in 68 bifurcation lesions treated by 15 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 17 paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) as first-generation DES, and by 17 zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and 19 everolimus-eluting stents (EES) as second-generation DES. Cross-sectional images of the bifurcation lesion using OCT were analyzed every 450 µm. All images were divided into three areas: inner wall of the bifurcation (IB), outer wall of the bifurcation (OB), and ostium of the side branch (SB). We compared the incidence of uncovered struts (IUS) among three areas and the averaged neointimal thickness (NIH) between IB and OB in each stent and also compared these OCT parameters among all DES. Results: There were no significant differences of IUS between IB and OB in second-generation DES, while in first-generation DES, IUS of IB and OB showed significant differences. The IUS of SES in both areas was significantly higher than in the other DES (all p < 0.001). PES had a significantly higher IUS in SB than the others (all p < 0.001). NIH of OB was significantly higher than that of IB in PES, ZES and EES, but in SES the NIH was similar in the two areas. Conclusions: OCT revealed different neointimal growth patterns among SES, PES, ZES and EES in bifurcation lesions,. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 02/2014; · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an optical analog of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) that can be used to examine the coronary arteries and has 10-fold higher resolution than IVUS. Based on polarization properties, OCT can differentiate tissue characteristics (fibrous, calcified, or lipid-rich plaque) and identify thin-cap fibroatheroma. Because of the strong attenuation of light by blood, OCT systems required the removal of blood during OCT examinations. A recently developed frequency-domain OCT system has a faster frame rate and pullback speed, making the OCT procedure more user-friendly and not requiring proximal balloon occlusion. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OCT can provide detailed information (dissection, tissue prolapse, thrombi, and incomplete stent apposition [ISA]). At follow-up examinations after stent implantation, stent strut coverage and ISA can be assessed. Several OCT studies have demonstrated delayed neointimal coverage following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation vs. bare metal stent (BMS) placement. While newer DESs promote more favorable vascular healing, the clinical implications remain unknown. Recent OCT studies have provided insights into restenotic tissue characteristics; DES restenotic morphologies differ from those with BMSs. OCT is a novel, promising imaging modality; with more in-depth assessments of its use, it may impact clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease.
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 03/2012; 27(1):1-12.