Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom structure in injured children: functional impairment and depression symptoms in a confirmatory factor analysis.

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3535 Market Street, Suite 1150, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.97). 06/2010; 49(6):616-25, 625.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in children and adolescents who have experienced an acute single-incident trauma, associations between PTSD symptom clusters and functional impairment, and the specificity of PTSD symptoms in relation to depression and general distress.
Examined PTSD symptom structure in two samples of children (8 to 17 years of age) assessed an average of 6 months after unintentional injury: (1) a combined dataset of 479 children assessed with a PTSD symptom checklist, and (2) a sample of 204 children assessed via a standardized clinical interview. We evaluated the fit of six alternative models for the factor structure of PTSD symptoms, and the association of PTS symptom clusters with indicators of functional impairment. We then evaluated three models for the structure of PTSD and depression symptoms jointly, to examine specificity of PTSD versus general distress or mood symptoms.
In both samples, the DSM-IV 3-factor model fit the data reasonably well. Two alternative four-factor models fit the data very well: one that separates effortful avoidance from emotional numbing, and one that separates PTSD-specific symptoms from general emotional distress. Effortful avoidance and dysphoria symptoms were most consistently associated with impairment. The best-fitting model for PTSD and depression symptom clusters had three factors: PTSD-specific, depression-specific, and general dysphoria symptoms.
The DSM-IV model for PTSD symptom categories was a reasonable fit for these child data, but several alternative models fit equally well or better, and suggest potential improvements to the current diagnostic criteria for PTSD in children.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given the consistent growth of the Latino population in the United States, there is a critical need for validated Spanish measures to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in children. The current study examines the psychometric properties of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS). We examined 259 children (8-17 years) who had experienced a recent traumatic event. Study measures were completed in Spanish (n = 106; boys = 58, girls = 48) or in English (n = 153; boys = 96, girls = 57). In addition to internal consistency, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted by testing four models to examine construct validity: (1) PTS single-factor, (2) DSM-IV three-factor, (3) Numbing four-factor, and (4) Dysphoria four-factor models. Findings demonstrated good internal consistency for both the English and Spanish versions of the CPSS. The English version revealed superior fit to the data for several models of PTS symptoms structure compared to the Spanish version. The current study demonstrated construct validity for the English CPSS, but not for the Spanish CPSS. Future studies will examine additional alternative models as well as convergent and discriminant validity of the Spanish CPSS.
    Child Psychiatry and Human Development 08/2014; · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Millions of children worldwide experience acute medical events. Children's responses to these events range from transient distress to significant posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (PTSS). While many models suggest explanations for the development and maintenance of PTSS in adults, very few have focused on children. Current models of child PTSS are primarily restricted to the post-trauma period, thus neglecting the critical peri-trauma period when screening and preventive interventions may be most easily implemented. Research on PTSS in response to pediatric medical trauma typically examines predictors in isolation, often overlooking potentially important interactions. This paper proposes a new model utilizing the bio-psycho-social framework and focusing on peri-trauma processes of acute medical events. Understanding the relationships among bio-psycho-social factors during peri-trauma can inform early identification of at-risk children, preventive interventions and clinical care. Recommendations for future research, including the need to examine PTSS in the context of multiple influences, are discussed.
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 09/2014; · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The inclusion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III (DSM-III) was a considerable achievement that has vastly enriched our knowledge of reactions to traumatic events and our ability to offer appropriate care to survivors. Nevertheless, limitations created by the way in which PTSD belatedly entered the diagnostic canon continue to create problems today. One problem was created by the assumption, subsequently proven incor-rect, that PTSD was fully explained by exposure to an event outside the range of usual human experience. This resulted in the stressor criterion, Criterion A, assuming a central role in the diagnosis. The realisation that PTSD can follow more mundane traumatic events such as motor-vehicle accidents that nevertheless have the potential to create intense fear and helplessness, and the confirmation that individual vulnerability is as important in PTSD as in other psychiatric dis-orders, has led inevitably to subsequent problems in defining exactly what does and does not comprise a traumatic event. In the late 1970s there was also far less appreciation than there is today con-cerning the role of stressful life events in the onset and maintenance of many psychiatric disorders. In seeking to introduce a condition that was defined in terms of the aetiological role of extreme stress, it may therefore not have been so evident to those crafting the DSM-III definition that traumatic stressors would produce a range of psychopathological reactions, and that it would be necessary Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, First Edition. Edited by Dan Stein, Matthew Friedman, and Carlos Blanco.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014