Comparison of coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, and Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Radiation Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.36). 01/2010; 5:40. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-40
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the differences in dose-volume data among coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), noncoplanar IMRT, and helical tomotherapy (HT) among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
Nine patients with unresectable HCC and PVT underwent step and shoot coplanar IMRT with intent to deliver 46-54 Gy to the tumor and portal vein. The volume of liver received 30Gy was set to keep less than 30% of whole normal liver (V30<30%). The mean dose to at least one side of kidney was kept below 23 Gy, and 50 Gy as for stomach. The maximum dose was kept below 47 Gy for spinal cord. Several parameters including mean hepatic dose, percent volume of normal liver with radiation dose at X Gy (Vx), uniformity index, conformal index, and doses to organs at risk were evaluated from the dose-volume histogram.
HT provided better uniformity for the planning-target volume dose coverage than both IMRT techniques. The noncoplanar IMRT technique reduces the V10 to normal liver with a statistically significant level as compared to HT. The constraints for the liver in the V30 for coplanar IMRT vs. noncoplanar IMRT vs. HT could be reconsidered as 21% vs. 17% vs. 17%, respectively. When delivering 50 Gy and 60-66 Gy to the tumor bed, the constraints of mean dose to the normal liver could be less than 20 Gy and 25 Gy, respectively.
Noncoplanar IMRT and HT are potential techniques of radiation therapy for HCC patients with PVT. Constraints for the liver in IMRT and HT could be stricter than for 3DCRT.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
    09/2014; 32(3):170-8. DOI:10.3857/roj.2014.32.3.170
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignant tumor with a high mortality rate. The optimal therapeutic choice for early HCC is surgical resection. However, the rate of intrahepatic recurrence is high. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of various factors on the survival of patients with early HCC. Between January 1st, 2006 and December 31st, 2013, a total of 89 patients who underwent surgery for HCC were retrospectively enrolled. The analysis was conducted using the Student's t-test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model to assess potential confounding and predictive variables. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 71%. The 3-year OS rates in patients with and those without vascular invasion were 62.1 and 92.8%, respectively (P<0.003). Based on the multivariate analysis, postoperative pathological vascular invasion (hazard ratio = 4.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.55-15.9) remained an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome. Furthermore, vascular invasion was significantly associated with intrahepatic metastasis. These data emphasize the need for effective adjuvant therapy in selected high-risk patients with early HCC. Further studies are required to determine the optimal approach to further improving the prognosis of early HCC.
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology 01/2015; 3(1):252-256. DOI:10.3892/mco.2014.420
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report on a 63-year-old man with a history of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma with a thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava, who received image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with helical tomotherapy, followed by sorafenib. A total tumor dose of 48 Gy was delivered by 6 fractions within 2 weeks. The tumor responded dramatically, and the patient tolerated the courses well. Ten days after SBRT, sorafenib (200 mg), at 1.5 tablets twice a day, was prescribed. One week later, grade 2 recall radiation dermatitis subsequently developed in the previous SBRT off-target area. SBRT followed by sorafenib for the treatment of a portal vein thrombosis provided effective results, but the potential risk of enhanced adverse effects between radiation and sorafenib should be considered with caution, especially under a SBRT scheme.
    OncoTargets and Therapy 01/2014; 7:1111-4. DOI:10.2147/OTT.S64706 · 1.34 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014