Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale development and metric properties.

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Journal of neurotrauma (Impact Factor: 4.25). 07/2010; 27(7):1167-85. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1076
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are poorly investigated, and a TBI-specific instrument has not previously been available. The cross-cultural development of a new measure to assess HRQoL after TBI is described here. An international TBI Task Force derived a conceptual model from previous work, constructed an initial item bank of 148 items, and then reduced the item set through two successive multicenter validation studies. The first study, with eight language versions of the QOLIBRI, recruited 1528 participants with TBI, and the second with six language versions, recruited 921 participants. The data from 795 participants from the second study who had complete Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) data were used to finalize the instrument. The final version of the QOLIBRI consists of 37 items in six scales (see Appendix ). Satisfaction is assessed in the areas of "Cognition," "Self," "Daily Life and Autonomy," and "Social Relationships," and feeling bothered by "Emotions," and "Physical Problems." The QOLIBRI scales meet standard psychometric criteria (internal consistency, alpha = 0.75-0.89, test-retest reliability, r(tt) = 0.78-0.85). Test-retest reliability (r(tt) = 0.68-0.87) as well as internal consistency (alpha = 0.81-0.91) were also good in a subgroup of participants with lower cognitive performance. Although there is one strong HRQoL factor, a six-scale structure explaining additional variance was validated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and with Rasch modeling. The QOLIBRI is a new cross-culturally developed instrument for assessing HRQoL after TBI that fulfills standard psychometric criteria. It is potentially useful for clinicians and researchers conducting clinical trials, for assessing the impact of rehabilitation or other interventions, and for carrying out epidemiological surveys.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the feasibility and impact of different dosages of Intensive Mobility Training (IMT) on mobility, balance, and gait speed in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). Prospective, single group design with 3-month follow-up. University research lab PARTICIPANTS: A volunteer sample of 10 participants with chronic TBI (≥3 months post-TBI, able to ambulate 3.05 m with or without assistance); median age 35.4 (IQR: 23.5, 46) years, median time post-TBI 9.91 (IQR: 6.3, 14.2) years. Follow-up data was collected for all participants. Twenty days (5 days/week x 4 weeks),150 minutes/day of repetitive, task-specific training equally divided among 1) balance, 2) gait training, and 3) strength, coordination, and range. Pain and fatigue were recorded before and after each session to assess feasibility. Treatment outcomes were assessed before training (pre), after 10 sessions (interim), after 20 sessions (post), and 3 months follow-up and included the Berg Balance Scale and gait speed. Participants averaged 150.1 (2.7) minutes/session. Median pre-session and post-session pain scores were 0/10 for 20 sessions; median pre-session fatigue scores ranged 0-2.5/10, post-session scores ranged 3-5.5/10. Four outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement pre-test to interim, with 7/10 participants exceeding the minimal detectable change (MDC) for fast walking speed. At post-test, two additional measures were significant, with more participants exceeding MDCs. Changes in fast walking speed and Timed Up and Go were significant at follow-up. Limited fluctuations in pain and fatigue scores indicate feasibility of IMT in this population. Participants demonstrated improvements in walking speed, mobility, and balance post-intervention, and maintained gains in fast walking speed and mobility at three months.
    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 04/2014; · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study Health related quality of life (HRQoL) of a sample of kindergarten children with migration background.
    BMC Public Health 08/2014; 14(1):790. · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: This study investigates coping strategies after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Participants were 141 adults followed up 3 months to 15 years after TBI of all severity degrees. Coping was assessed by the Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness (FQCI) and HRQoL by the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) scale and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Coping dimensions were extracted by principal component analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of coping strategies. Results: Two factors for coping after TBI were extracted: Action/Distraction and Trivialisation/Resignation. The Trivialisation/Resignation strategy was negatively correlated with all aspects of HRQoL, while relationships with the Action/Distraction strategy were positive and significant for two domains. These two factors also showed significant associations with anxiety, depression, recovery, cognitive status, mood states and trauma severity. Multiple regression analysis identified recovery status as a predictor for the maladaptive Trivialisation/Resignation strategy. Conclusion: Two coping factors were identified, which were differentially associated with HRQoL. Maladaptive coping strategies play a particularly important role, and less reliance on such strategies is associated with better HRQoL; use of adaptive strategies should correspondingly be fostered. Implications for Rehabilitation This study highlights the relationship of coping strategies and HRQoL after TBI. For the assessment of HRQoL a novel disease-specific instrument was applied, that provides in detail TBI-relevant aspects of well-being and HRQoL. Individuals after TBI use two main sets of coping strategies that are differentially associated with HRQoL (and clinical variables). One is adaptive and the other maladaptive for HRQoL after TBI. Maladaptive and adaptive coping strategies used by the individual should be identified and considered in rehabilitation efforts to improve HRQoL after TBI.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 03/2014; · 1.84 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 1, 2014