High prevalence, coinfection rate, and genetic diversity of retroviruses in Wild Red Colobus Monkeys (Piliocolobus badius badius) in Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire

Research Group Emerging Zoonoses, Robert Koch Institut, Nordufer 20, Berlin, Germany.
Journal of Virology (Impact Factor: 4.65). 08/2010; 84(15):7427-36. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00697-10
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Simian retroviruses are precursors of all human retroviral pathogens. However, little is known about the prevalence and coinfection rates or the genetic diversity of major retroviruses-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), simian T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (STLV-1), and simian foamy virus (SFV)-in wild populations of nonhuman primates. Such information would contribute to the understanding of the natural history of retroviruses in various host species. Here, we estimate these parameters for wild West African red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus badius badius) in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. We collected samples from a total of 54 red colobus monkeys; samples consisted of blood and/or internal organs from 22 monkeys and additionally muscle and other tissue samples from another 32 monkeys. PCR analyses revealed a high prevalence of SIV, STLV-1, and SFV in this population, with rates of 82%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. Forty-five percent of the monkeys were coinfected with all three viruses while another 32% were coinfected with SIV in combination with either STLV or SFV. As expected, phylogenetic analyses showed a host-specific pattern for SIV and SFV strains. In contrast, STLV-1 strains appeared to be distributed in genetically distinct and distant clades, which are unique to the Taï forest and include strains previously described from wild chimpanzees in the same area. The high prevalence of all three retroviral infections in P. b. badius represents a source of infection to chimpanzees and possibly to humans, who hunt them.

Download full-text


Available from: Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer, Aug 26, 2015
  • Source
    • "SFV prevalence in sooty mangabeys seems high, but the sample size is still too small to derive a meaningful prevalence estimate (nine positive individuals out of twelve tested; J Gogarten and F Leendertz unpublished data). SFV in red colobus has one of the highest prevalences of all retroviruses so far tested for at Taï National Park (apparent prevalence¼86% (95% CI 72–100); Leendertz et al., 2010). This is a similarly high prevalence as found in red colobus in East Africa and non-human primate populations in general (Calattini et al., 2004; Goldberg et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The existence and genetic make-up of most primate retroviruses was revealed by studies of bushmeat and fecal samples from unhabituated primate communities. For these, detailed data on intra-and within-species contact rates are generally missing, which makes identification of factors influencing transmission a challenging task. Here we present an assessment of 12 years of research on primate retroviruses in the Taï National Park area, Côte d'Ivoire. We discuss insights gained into the prevalence, within-and cross-species transmission of primate retroviruses (including towards local human populations) and the importance of virus–host interactions in determining cross-species transmission risk. Finally we discuss how retroviruses ecology and evolution may change in a shifting environment and identify avenues for future research.
    Virology 07/2014; 460-461:147-153. DOI:10.1016/j.virol.2014.05.012 · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Stomach passage time in primates is much shorter than in carnivores (Meyer et al., 1985, 1988, as cited by; Wrangham, 2009), which presumably compromises digestion of raw meat. Reduced stomach time may also increase the risk of disease transmission (Leendertz et al., 2010), another possible cost of eating meat. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the benefits and costs of acquiring and consuming different forms of animal matter by primates is critical for identifying the selective pressures responsible for increased meat consumption in the hominin lineage. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are unusual among primates in the amount of vertebrate prey they consume. Still, surprisingly little is known about the nutritional benefits of eating meat for this species. In order to understand why chimpanzees eat vertebrates, it is critical to consider the relative benefits and costs of other types of faunivory – including invertebrates. Although we lack specific nutritional data on the flesh and organs of chimpanzee prey, the macronutrient profiles of insects and wild vertebrate meat are generally comparable on a gram-to-gram basis. There are currently very few data on the micronutrient (vitamin and mineral) content of meat consumed by chimpanzees. With few exceptions, the advantages of hunting vertebrate prey include year-round availability, rapid acquisition of larger packages and reduced handling/processing time (once prey are encountered or detected). The disadvantages of hunting vertebrate prey include high potential acquisition costs per unit time (energy expenditure and risk of injury) and greater contest competition with conspecifics. Acquiring an equivalent mass of invertebrates (to match even a small scrap of meat) is possible, but typically takes more time. Furthermore, in contrast to vertebrate prey, some insect resources are effectively available only at certain times of the year. Here we identify the critical data needed to test our hypothesis that meat scraps may have a higher (or at least comparable) net benefit:cost ratio than insect prey. This would support the ‘meat scrap’ hypothesis as an explanation for why chimpanzees hunt in groups even when doing so does not maximize an individual's energetic gain.
    Journal of Human Evolution 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.02.015 · 3.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Despite extensive testing for HIV cross-reactive antibody detection, researchers have not yet detected any naturally occurring lentiviruses in West African chimpanzees (Prince et al. 2002; Switzer et al. 2005; Van Heuverswyn et al. 2007a). However, ≤80% of western red colobus (Leendertz et al. 2010; Locatelli et al. 2008b) and 50% of sooty mangabeys are infected with SIV (Santiago et al. 2005). Importantly, the sooty mangabey populations from this part of Africa are the ancestors of the HIV-2 strains responsible for the epidemic in West Africa. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is now well established that the human immunodeficiency viruses, HIV-1 and HIV-2, are the results of cross-species transmissions of simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIV) naturally infecting nonhuman primates in sub-Saharan Africa. SIVs are found in many African primates, and humans continue to be exposed to these viruses by hunting and handling primate bushmeat. Sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) and western red colobus (Piliocolobus badius badius) are infected with SIV at a high rate in the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. We investigated the SIV infection and prevalence in 6 other monkey species living in the Taï Forest using noninvasive methods. We collected 127 fecal samples from 2 colobus species (Colobus polykomos and Procolobus verus) and 4 guenon species (C. diana, C. campbelli, C. petaurista, and C. nictitans). We tested these samples for HIV cross-reactive antibodies and performed reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) targeting the gag, pol, and env regions of the SIV genome. We screened 16 human microsatellites for use in individual discrimination and identified 4–6 informative markers per species. Serological analysis of 112 samples yielded negative (n = 86) or uninterpretable (n = 26) results. PCR analysis on 74 samples confirmed the negative results. These results may reflect either the limited number of individuals sampled or a low prevalence of infection. Further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of noninvasive methods for SIV detection. KeywordsMicrosatellites–Nonhuman primates–Noninvasive sampling–Serologic assays–SIV
    International Journal of Primatology 01/2011; 32(2):288-307. DOI:10.1007/s10764-010-9466-7 · 1.99 Impact Factor
Show more