One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex

Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 06/2010; 107(23):10418-23. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000967107
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Though opening of the start site (+1) region of promoter DNA is required for transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP), surprisingly little is known about how and when this occurs in the mechanism. Early events at the lambdaP(R) promoter load this region of duplex DNA into the active site cleft of Escherichia coli RNAP, forming the closed, permanganate-unreactive intermediate I(1). Conversion to the subsequent intermediate I(2) overcomes a large enthalpic barrier. Is I(2) open? Here we create a burst of I(2) by rapidly destabilizing open complexes (RP(o)) with 1.1 M NaCl. Fast footprinting reveals that thymines at positions from -11 to +2 in I(2) are permanganate-reactive, demonstrating that RNAP opens the entire initiation bubble in the cleft in a single step. Rates of decay of all observed thymine reactivities are the same as the I(2) to I(1) conversion rate determined by filter binding. In I(2), permanganate reactivity of the +1 thymine on the template (t) strand is the same as the RP(o) control, whereas nontemplate (nt) thymines are significantly less reactive than in RP(o). We propose that: (i) the +1(t) thymine is in the active site in I(2); (ii) conversion of I(2) to RP(o) repositions the nt strand in the cleft; and (iii) movements of the nt strand are coupled to the assembly and DNA binding of the downstream clamp and jaw that occurs after DNA opening and stabilizes RP(o). We hypothesize that unstable open intermediates at the lambdaP(R) promoter resemble the unstable, transcriptionally competent open complexes formed at ribosomal promoters.

Download full-text


Available from: Ruth Saecker, Aug 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "During the transcription, the RNAP using accessory factors binds to a specific DNA consensus sequence at the level of the promoter (P) forming a closed complex (RP c ). The RP c isomerises, through multiple intermediate states that can be promoter and factor specific [7] [8], to a final open complex state (RP o ), competent for transcription, where the double-stranded DNA has melted out and the transcription starting site (the +1 site) is at the active centre of RNAP. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AAA proteins (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) are involved in almost all essential cellular processes ranging from DNA replication, transcription regulation to protein degradation. One class of AAA proteins has evolved to adapt to the specific task of coupling ATPase activity to activating transcription. These upstream promoter DNA bound AAA activator proteins contact their target substrate, the σ(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, through DNA looping, reminiscent of the eukaryotic enhance binding proteins. These specialised macromolecular machines remodel their substrates through ATP hydrolysis that ultimately leads to transcriptional activation. We will discuss how AAA proteins are specialised for this specific task.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 08/2011; 1823(1):108-16. DOI:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.08.012 · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transcription by all RNA polymerases (RNAPs) requires a series of large-scale conformational changes to form the transcriptionally competent open complex RP(o). At the lambdaP(R) promoter, Escherichia coli sigma(70) RNAP first forms a wrapped, closed 100 bp complex I(1). The subsequent step opens the entire DNA bubble, creating the relatively unstable (open) complex I(2). Additional conformational changes convert I(2) to the stable RP(o). Here we probe these events by dissecting the effects of Na(+) salts of Glu(-), F(-), and Cl(-) on each step in this critical process. Rapid mixing and nitrocellulose filter binding reveal that the binding constant for I(1) at 25 degrees C is approximately 30-fold larger in Glu(-) than in Cl(-) at the same Na(+) concentration, with the same log-log salt concentration dependence for both anions. In contrast, both the rate constant and equilibrium constant for DNA opening (I(1) to I(2)) are only weakly dependent on salt concentration, and the opening rate constant is insensitive to replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-). These very small effects of salt concentration on a process (DNA opening) that is strongly dependent on salt concentration in solution may indicate that the backbones of both DNA strands interact with polymerase throughout the process and/or that compensation is present between ion uptake and release. Replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-) or F(-) at 25 degrees C greatly increases the lifetime of RP(o) and greatly reduces its salt concentration dependence. By analogy to Hofmeister salt effects on protein folding, we propose that the excluded anions Glu(-) and F(-) drive the folding and assembly of the RNAP clamp/jaw domains in the conversion of I(2) to RP(o), while Cl(-) does not. Because the Hofmeister effect of Glu(-) or F(-) largely compensates for the destabilizing Coulombic effect of any salt on the binding of this assembly to downstream promoter DNA, RP(o) remains long-lived even at 0.5 M Na(+) in Glu(-) or F(-) salts. The observation that Esigma(70) RP(o) complexes are exceedingly long-lived at moderate to high Glu(-) concentrations argues that Esigma(70) RNAP does not dissociate from strong promoters in vivo when the cytoplasmic glutamate concentration increases during osmotic stress.
    Biochemistry 03/2010; 49(20):4361-73. DOI:10.1021/bi100092a · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Promoter recognition by RNA polymerase is a key point in gene expression and a target of regulation. Bacterial RNA polymerase binds promoters in the form of the holoenzyme, with the σ specificity subunit being primarily responsible for promoter recognition. Free σ, however, does not recognize promoter DNA, and it has been proposed that the intrinsic DNA binding ability is masked in free σ but becomes unmasked in the holoenzyme. Here, we use a newly developed fluorescent assay to quantitatively study the interactions of free σ(70) from Escherichia coli, the β'-σ complex, and the σ(70) RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme with non-template strand of the open promoter complex transcription bubble in the context of model non-template oligonucleotides and fork junction templates. We show that σ(70), free or in the context of the holoenzyme, recognizes the -10 promoter element with the same efficiency and specificity. The result implies that there is no need to invoke a conformational change in σ for recognition of the -10 element in the single-stranded form. In the holoenzyme, weak but specific interactions of σ are increased by contacts with DNA downstream of the -10 element. We further show that region 1 of σ(70) is required for stronger interaction with non-template oligonucleotides in the holoenzyme but not in free σ. Finally, we show that binding of the β' RNAP subunit is sufficient to allow specific recognition of the TG motif of the extended -10 promoter element by σ(70). The new fluorescent assay, which we call a protein beacon assay, will be instrumental in quantitative dissection of fine details of RNAP interactions with promoters.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 10/2010; 286(1):270-9. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M110.174102 · 4.57 Impact Factor
Show more