Singh H, Vij MS. Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results

Houston US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service (VA HSR&D) Center of Excellence, Houston, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 05/2010; 36(5):226-32.
Source: PubMed


BACKGROUND: Health care organizations continue to struggle to ensure that critical findings are communicated and acted on in a timely and appropriate manner. Recent research highlights the risks of communication breakdowns along the entire spectrum of test-result abnormality, including significantly abnormal but nonemergent findings. Evidence-based and practical institutional policies must uphold effective processes to guide communication of abnormal test results. Eight recommendations for effective policies on communication of abnormal diagnostic test results were developed based on policy refinement at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston), institutional experience with test result management, and findings from research performed locally and elsewhere. KEY FACETS OF EFFECTIVE POLICIES: Research findings on vulnerabilities in existing policies and procedures were taken into consideration. The eight recommendations are based on important refinements to the policy which clarified staff roles and responsibilities for test ordering, follow-up, and communication; defined categories of abnormal test results to guide appropriate follow-up action; and elaborated procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of test result communication and follow-up. Participation of key stakeholders is recommended to enhance buy-in from personnel and to help ensure the policies feasibility and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed recommendations for ensuring safe test-result communication may be potentially useful to a wide variety of institutions and health care settings. These practical suggestions, based on research findings and experiences with a previous policy, may be a useful guide for designing or amending policies for safe test-result communication in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Download full-text


Available from: Hardeep Singh, Oct 08, 2015
41 Reads
  • Source
    • "We inquired whether PCPs would endorse several potential strategies to improve EHR-based notification. Strategies were selected based on thematic areas of improvement identified in previous work8 10 11 16 18 37 and addressed both technical and social dimensions. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context Failure to notify patients of test results is common even when electronic health records (EHRs) are used to report results to practitioners. We sought to understand the broad range of social and technical factors that affect test result management in an integrated EHR-based health system. Methods Between June and November 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of all primary care practitioners (PCPs) within the Department of Veterans Affairs nationwide. Survey development was guided by a socio-technical model describing multiple inter-related dimensions of EHR use. Findings Of 5001 PCPs invited, 2590 (51.8%) responded. 55.5% believed that the EHRs did not have convenient features for notifying patients of test results. Over a third (37.9%) reported having staff support needed for notifying patients of test results. Many relied on the patient's next visit to notify them for normal (46.1%) and abnormal results (20.1%). Only 45.7% reported receiving adequate training on using the EHR notification system and 35.1% reported having an assigned contact for technical assistance with the EHR; most received help from colleagues (60.4%). A majority (85.6%) stayed after hours or came in on weekends to address notifications; less than a third reported receiving protected time (30.1%). PCPs strongly endorsed several new features to improve test result management, including better tracking and visualization of result notifications. Conclusions Despite an advanced EHR, both social and technical challenges exist in ensuring notification of test results to practitioners and patients. Current EHR technology requires significant improvement in order to avoid similar challenges elsewhere.
    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12/2012; 20(4). DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. In the C. Poma Hospital of Mantua we have been using a system of continuous surveillance of nosocomial infections based on microbiological data for the past 4 years. This monitoring estimates the incidence of the microorganisms found in cultures, especially those at risk of causing nosocomial infections. Materials and methods. Since June 2001 microbiological data have been registered using the Mercurio-Dianoema software and elaborated by means of Microsoft Excel in order to obtain information about isolated bacteria, especially those resistant to antibiotics. Results. Surveillance in "critical" wards revealed the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans in the intensive care unit in the period 2003-2005. The most frequent bacteria in hemodialysis have been coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus, with variable methicillin resistance. Conclusion. The analysis of microbiological data has promoted effective measures to reduce the incidence of these bacteria (increased rules of good practice, hand washing, etc.). If nosocomial infections or high-risk microorganisms occur, assessments are carried out; monitoring of the antibiotic resistance of the bacteria is very important. (G Ital Nefrol 2007; 24: (Suppl. S38) S33-8) Conflict of interest: None
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: External reporting of medical errors a adverse events enables learning from the errors of others in the pursuit of systems-level improvements that can prevent future errors. It is logical to presume that medication errors involving the use of anticoagulants, among the most frequently cited product classes involved in harmful medication errors, would be captured in a variety of patient safety reporting programs. Data on reported errors involving the anticoagulant heparin were reviewed, compared, and aggregated from the databases of three large patient safety reporting programs-MEDMARX, the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority's Patient Safety Reporting System, and the University Health System Consortium, together representing more than 1,000 reporting organizations for 2005 Approximately 300,000 medication errors and near misses were reported to the programs, and 10,359-a mean of 3.6% (range, 3.1%-5.5%)-involved heparin products. The proportion of heparin-related reports that involved patient harm ranged from 1.4% to 4.9%. The phase of the medication use process cited most frequently in harmful events was the administration phase (56% of errors leading to harm), followed by the prescribing phase (19% of errors leading to harm). This study represents the first attempt by these three large reporting systems to combine data on a single clinical process. The consistent patterns evident in the reports, such as the percentage of all medication errors that involved heparin, suggests that reporting programs, at least for common events such as medication errors, may reach a point of diminishing returns in which aggregating more reports of a certain type yields no additional insight once a large volume of similar events is captured and analyzed.
    Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 05/2010; 36(5):195-202.
Show more