Article

Adherence to ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the surgical intensive care unit.

Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, 88 E Newton St, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) (Impact Factor: 4.32). 05/2010; 145(5):465-70. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.69
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the impact of adherence to a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) bundle on the incidence of VAP in our surgical intensive care units (SICUs).
Prospectively collected data were retrospectively examined from our Infection Control Committee surveillance database of SICU patients over a 38-month period. Cost of VAP was estimated at $30,000 per patient stay.
Two SICUs at a tertiary care academic level I trauma center.
Ventilated patients admitted to a SICU.
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement VAP bundle was instituted at the beginning of the study and included head-of-bed elevation, extubation assessment, sedation break, peptic ulcer prophylaxis, and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. A daily checklist was considered compliant if all 5 items were performed for each patient.
Patients were assessed for VAP. Staff were assessed for compliance with the VAP bundle.
Prior to initiation of the bundle, VAP was seen at a rate of 10.2 cases/1000 ventilator days. Compliance with the VAP bundle increased over the study period from 53% and 63% to 91% and 81% in each respective SICU. The rate of VAP decreased to 3.4 cases/1000 ventilator days. A cost savings of $1.08 million was estimated.
Initiation of the VAP bundle is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of VAP in patients in the SICU and with cost savings. Initiation of a VAP bundle protocol is an effective method for VAP reduction when compliance is maintained.

1 Bookmark
 · 
365 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tony Bui 1,4 (tony.bui@cox.net) Justin J. Pattee 2,4 (backageyard@gmail.com) Elsa J. Whitmore 2,4 (elsa_whitmore@hotmail.com) Maaz Iqbal 1,4 (maaziqbal@gmail.com) Steven Lee 3,4 (timmah2k@gmail.com) Clement U. Singarajah 2,4 (clement.singarajah@va.gov) Richard A. Robbins 1,4,5 (rickrobbins@cox.net) None of the authors report any significant conflicts of interest. Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines are developed to assist in patient care but the evidence basis for many guidelines has recently been called into question.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Care bundles have been shown to improve outcomes, reduce hospital readmissions and reduce length of hospital stay; therefore increasing the speed of uptake and delivery of care bundles should be a priority in order to deliver more timely improvements and consistent high-quality care. Previous studies have detailed the difficulties of obtaining full compliance to bundle elements but few have described the underlying reasons for this. In order to improve future implementation this paper investigates the challenges encountered by clinical teams implementing a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care bundle and describes actions taken to overcome these challenges. An initial retrospective documentary analysis of data from seven clinical implementation teams was undertaken to review the challenges faced by the clinical teams. Three focus groups with healthcare professionals and managers explored solutions to these challenges developed during the project. Documentary analysis identified 28 challenges which directly impacted implementation of the COPD care bundle within five themes; staffing, infrastructure, process, use of improvement methodology and patient and public involvement. Focus groups revealed that the five most significant challenges for all groups were: staff too busy, staff shortages, lack of staff engagement, added workload of the bundle and patient coding issues. The participants shared facilitating factors used to overcome issues including: shifting perceptions to improve engagement, further education sessions to increase staff participation and gaining buy-in from managers through payment frameworks. Maximising the impact of a care bundle relies on its successful and timely implementation. Teams implementing the COPD care bundle encountered challenges that were common to all teams and sites. Understanding and learning from the challenges faced by previous endeavours and identifying the facilitators to overcoming these barriers provides an opportunity to mitigate issues that waste time and resources, and ensures that training can be tailored to the anticipated challenges.
    BMJ open respiratory research. 01/2014; 1(1):e000035.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer is a highly invasive procedure. Most studies analyzing the risk factors for pulmonary morbidity were conducted in the early 1990s. However, previous studies did not use fixed diagnostic criteria for postoperative pneumonia and reported widely varying onset frequencies.To define postoperative pneumonia diagnostic criteria, clarify the onset frequency of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy in accordance with these criteria, and investigate the risk factors of postoperative pneumonia.Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia were analyzed in 615 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2006 and December 2007 at 7 Japanese institutions using logistic regression models. The necessary criterion for a pneumonia diagnosis was an infiltrative shadow on a chest radiograph. Furthermore, a pneumonia diagnosis was based on the presence of at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: white blood count abnormalities, body temperature of 38 °C or higher, and purulent sputum.Overall, 615 patients were statistically analyzed. Pneumonia onset occurred in 66 cases (10.7 %). The risk of postoperative pneumonia was associated with a preoperative body weight loss of 5 % or more and late tracheal tube extubation.This study revealed that preoperative body weight loss increased the risk of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, while early-stage tracheal tube extubation reduced the risk.
    Esophagus 04/2014; 11(2). · 0.74 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
594 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014