Article

An increased visceral-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio is associated with difficult-to-treat hypertension in men.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Journal of Hypertension (Impact Factor: 4.22). 06/2010; 28(6):1340-6. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328338158b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is considered to be a component in metabolic syndrome, an accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors that includes increased blood pressure; however, there are no previous data showing an association between increases in the VAT-subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) ratio and difficult-to-treat hypertension.
In 572 patients who had cardiovascular risk factors and who were under stable antihypertensive treatment, we evaluated whether the VAT-SAT ratio, as assessed by abdominal computed tomography, predicted difficult-to-treat hypertension, which we defined as an elevation of clinic blood pressure (i.e., clinic blood pressure >or=140/90 mmHg) during treatment with at least three antihypertensive drugs.
In men, an elevated VAT-SAT ratio [odds ratio (OR) 1.44 per 1 SD (0.52), 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.92] and alcohol drinking habit (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.07-4.36) were significant predictors of difficult-to-treat hypertension, independently of the presence of metabolic syndrome or the insulin level. However, when we included diuretic use in the diagnosis of difficult-to-treat hypertension (i.e., resistant hypertension), the significance of the VAT-SAT ratio disappeared (P = 0.06), and a decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.74 per 10 ml/min per 1.73 m, 95% CI 0.58-0.94) and alcohol drinking habit (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.74-10.68) were the significant predictors. In contrast, in women, the VAT-SAT ratio did not predict difficult-to-treat hypertension (P = 0.18).
An increased VAT-SAT ratio was associated with difficult-to-treat hypertension in men, but not with resistant hypertension, suggesting that diuretic use may partly affect the relationship between the VAT-SAT ratio and difficult-to-treat hypertension.

0 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity are prevalent in adults. The relationship between DM and body adipose tissue (AT) distribution is complex and although it has been investigated extensively, the subject remains controversial. Although a causal association between DM and obesity and AT distribution cannot be established on the basis of existing data, it is possible to conclude from many studies that gene, serum sex steroids level, daily physical activity and food supply can be the risk of obesity and AT redistribution factor among type 2 DM patients (T2DM). Obesity and AT redistribution of T2DM patients can increase the risk of insulin resistant (IR), cardiovascular disease and many other disorders. Even though obesity and AT redistribution screening or prophylactic treatment in all patients with T2DM is not being recommended at present, such patient populations should be given general guidelines regarding exercise, food intake control, and even medicinal treatment. The extent of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions should be based on the individual's risk profile.
    Obesity Research & Clinical Practice 10/2012; 6(4):e270–e279. DOI:10.1016/j.orcp.2012.09.003 · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between having a cardiovascular risk factor and endothelial dysfunction observed on a time-course analysis of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) remains unclear. We enrolled 257 patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We measured FMD magnitude of the percentage change in peak diameter (ΔFMD), maximum FMD rate calculated as the maximum slope of dilation (FMD-MDR), and integrated FMD response calculated as the area under the dilation curve during the 60- and 120-second dilation periods (FMD-AUC60 and FMD-AUC120) using a semiautomatic edge-detection algorithm. FMD-AUC60 and FMD-AUC120 were negatively correlated with the Framingham risk score (FMD-AUC60: r = -0.15, P = .023; FMD-AUC120: r = -0.17, P = .007), whereas this association was not found in the case of either the ΔFMD or the FMR-MDR. The Framingham risk score was significantly higher in patients in the lowest tertile for FMD-AUC120 (FMD-AUC120 <5.0 mm × second) than in those in the highest tertile for FMD-AUC120 (FMD-AUC120 ≥11.0 mm × second) (12.9 ± 8.7 vs. 8.6 ± 7.8%, P = .002). The lowest tertile for FMD-AUC120 was independently associated with the Framingham risk score (β = 0.10, P = .011), after adjustments were made for age, gender, and smoking and drinking status. FMD-AUC120 was associated with cardiovascular risk.
    Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) 02/2012; 6(2):109-16. DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2011.11.005 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the prevalence of and characterize resistant hypertension in a large representative population with successful hypertension management and reliable health information. We performed a cross-sectional study using clinical encounter, laboratory, and administrative information from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007. From individuals older than 17 years with hypertension, resistant hypertension was identified and prevalence was determined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), with adjustments for demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and medication use. Of 470,386 hypertensive individuals, 60,327 (12.8%) were identified as having resistant disease, representing 15.3% of those taking medications. Overall, 37,061 patients (7.9%) had uncontrolled hypertension while taking 3 or more medicines. The ORs (95% CIs) for resistant hypertension were greater for black race (1.68 [1.62-1.75]), older age (1.11 [1.10-1.11] for every 5-year increase), male sex (1.06 [1.03-1.10]), and obesity (1.46 [1.42-1.51]). Medication adherence rates were higher in those with resistant hypertension (93% vs 89.8%; P<.001). Chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.78-1.90), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.53-1.63), and cardiovascular disease (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.30-1.39) were also associated with higher risk of resistant hypertension. In a more standardized hypertension treatment environment, we observed a rate of resistant hypertension comparable with that of previous studies using more fragmented data sources. Past observations have been limited due to nonrepresentative populations, reliability of the data, heterogeneity of the treatment environments, and less than ideal control rates. This cohort, which was established using an electronic medical record-based approach, has the potential to provide a better understanding of resistant hypertension and outcomes.
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10/2013; 88(10):1099-1107. DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.017 · 5.81 Impact Factor