Virtue or Pretense? Looking behind Self-Declared Innocence in Doping

School of Life Sciences, Kingston University London, Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 05/2010; 5(5):e10457. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010457
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Social science studies of doping practices in sport rely predominantly on self-reports. Studies of psychoactive drug use indicate that self-reporting is characterised by under-reporting. Likewise doping practice is likely to be equally under-reported, if not more so. This calls for more sophisticated methods for such reporting and for independent, objective validation of its results. The aims of this study were: i) to contrast self-reported doping use with objective results from chemical hair analysis and ii) to investigate the influence of the discrepancy on doping attitudes, social projection, descriptive norms and perceived pressure to use doping.
A doping attitudes questionnaire was developed and combined with a response latency-based implicit association test and hair sample analysis for key doping substances in 14 athletes selected from a larger sample (N = 82) to form contrast comparison groups. Results indicate that patterns of group differences in social projection, explicit attitude about and perceived pressure to use doping, vary depending on whether the user and non-user groups are defined by self-report or objectively verified through hair analysis. Thus, self-confessed users scored higher on social projection, explicit attitude to doping and perceived pressure. However, when a doping substance was detected in the hair of an athlete who denied doping use, their self-report evidenced extreme social desirability (negative attitude, low projection and low perceived pressure) and contrasted sharply with a more positive estimate of their implicit doping attitude.
Hair analysis for performance enhancing substances has shown considerable potential in validating athletes' doping attitude estimations and admissions of use. Results not only confirm the need for improved self-report methodology for future research in socially-sensitive domains but also indicate where the improvements are likely to come from: as chemical validation remains expensive, a more realistic promise for large scale studies and online data collection efforts is held by measures of implicit social cognition.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of doping in elite sports is relevant for all those involved in sports, particularly for evaluating anti-doping policy measures. Remarkably, few scientific articles have addressed this subject so far, and the last review dates back to 1997. As a consequence, the true prevalence of doping in elite sports is unknown. Even though it is virtually impossible to uncover the exact prevalence of a prohibited activity such as doping, various methods are available to uncover parts of this particular problem, which enables the circumvention (to a certain degree) of the issues of truthfulness, definition problems and the limits of pharmacological evidence. This review outlines the various methods that exist and presents the scarce data available in this area. It is concluded that a combination of questionnaires using the Randomised Response Technique and models of biological parameters is able to provide the statistical possibilities to reveal accurate estimates of this often undisclosed practice. Data gathered in this way yield an estimation of 14-39 % of current adult elite athletes who intentionally used doping. These period prevalences have been found in specific sub-groups of elite athletes, and the available data suggest that the prevalence of doping is considerably different between sub-groups with varying types of sport, levels and nationalities. The above-mentioned figure of 14-39 % is likely to be a more accurate reflection of the prevalence of intentional doping in elite sports than that provided by doping control test results (estimate of doping: 1-2 % annually) or questionnaire-based research (estimations between 1 and 70 % depending on sport, level and exact definitions of intent and doping). In the future, analytical science may play a more important role in this topic if it may become feasible to detect very low concentrations of prohibited substances in sewage systems downstream of major sporting events. However, it is clear that current doping control test results show a distinct underestimation of true doping prevalence. It does not seem feasible to distil better estimates of the prevalence of doping based on performance indicators or ego documents because of the various existing effects that influence athletic performance. Such information can only be used as extra information to augment the accuracy of prevalence rates that have been found by using other techniques. True doping prevalence studies have been scarce in elite sports so far. With the correct application of the available scientific methods, preferably using harmonised definitions of the terms 'doping' and 'elite sports', more information on this topic may be gathered in a relatively short time. This would assist anti-doping professionals in the future in order to evaluate the effects of possible anti-doping measures, and better anti-doping policies would serve athletes who compete without doping. The existing anti-doping measures seriously impact the lives of elite athletes and their immediate entourage, which imposes a moral burden to evaluate these measures in the best possible way.
    Sports Medicine 08/2014; 45(1). DOI:10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x · 5.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Knowing and, if necessary, altering competitive athletes' real attitudes towards the use of banned performance-enhancing substances is an important goal of worldwide doping prevention efforts. However athletes will not always be willing to reporting their real opinions. Reaction time-based attitude tests help conceal the ultimate goal of measurement from the participant and impede strategic answering. This study investigated how well a reaction time-based attitude test discriminated between athletes who were doping and those who were not. We investigated whether athletes whose urine samples were positive for at least one banned substance (dopers) evaluated doping more favorably than clean athletes (non-dopers).
    Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 09/2014; 9(1):36. DOI:10.1186/1747-597X-9-36 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the progress made in applying response time methodology to assess implicit doping attitudes. The eight published studies reviewed in this paper evidenced the presence of implicit doping-related social cognition but without convincing discriminatory or predictive power. The response-time based measures using affective valence generally showed negative ‘implicit attitudes’ toward doping regardless of involvement; and none were able to predict self-reported doping behaviour over and above explicit attitude measures. Results suggest that this shortcoming could be explained by cognitive (in)consistency, marginally relevant affective frames and lack of conceptual clarity about what response time measures represent. Evidence emerged that relying on self-reports as behavioural outcome measures can yield misleading conclusions about the predictor variable. Research-design-imposed framing effect of the socially but not ecologically relevant heuristics on the implicit tests can produce non-interpretable outcomes. To facilitate future research into doping-related implicit social cognition, it is proposed that implicit doping attitude is best conceptualised as a collection of evaluations of the self-relevant thoughts about doping behaviour that are contextually retrieved from mental representations in meta-cognitively validated forms. Future research should adopt conceptual clarity of what performance on implicit tasks actually measure, focus on the cognitive processes and context that produce these measures and separate attitude from environmentally influenced associations. Researchers should move away from the prevailing but limiting affective/moralistic view of doping and incorporate alternative frames and methods to implicit social cognitive measures.
    01/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.peh.2014.08.003