Interactive Effects of Stress and Aging on Structural Plasticity in the Prefrontal Cortex

Fishberg Department of Neuroscience and Kastor Neurobiology of Aging Laboratories, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 6.34). 05/2010; 30(19):6726-31. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0759-10.2010
Source: PubMed


Neuronal networks in the prefrontal cortex mediate the highest levels of cognitive processing and decision making, and the capacity to perform these functions is among the cognitive features most vulnerable to aging. Despite much research, the neurobiological basis of age-related compromised prefrontal function remains elusive. Many investigators have hypothesized that exposure to stress may accelerate cognitive aging, though few studies have directly tested this hypothesis and even fewer have investigated a neuronal basis for such effects. It is known that in young animals, stress causes morphological remodeling of prefrontal pyramidal neurons that is reversible. The present studies sought to determine whether age influences the reversibility of stress-induced morphological plasticity in rat prefrontal neurons. We hypothesized that neocortical structural resilience is compromised in normal aging. To directly test this hypothesis we used a well characterized chronic restraint stress paradigm, with an additional group allowed to recover from the stress paradigm, in 3-, 12-, and 20-month-old male rats. In young animals, stress induced reductions of apical dendritic length and branch number, which were reversed with recovery; in contrast, middle-aged and aged rats failed to show reversible morphological remodeling when subjected to the same stress and recovery paradigm. The data presented here provide evidence that aging is accompanied by selective impairments in long-term neocortical morphological plasticity.

Download full-text


Available from: William Gm Janssen,
    • "It is also noteworthy that hippocampal volume increases with intense learning (Draganski et al. 2006), but is also decreased in Cushing's disease (Starkman et al. 1992). However, there is age-related loss of resilience of the dendrite shrinkage in prefrontal cortex (Bloss et al. 2010), as well as age-related memory impairment, which, however, can be reduced by pharmacological intervention (Bloss et al. 2008, Pereira et al. 2014). These treatments may find their way into treating human mild cognitive impairment and perhaps also dementia. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The discovery of steroid hormone receptors in brain regions that mediate every aspect of brain function has broadened the definition of "neuroendocrinology" to include the reciprocal communication between the brain and the body via hormonal and neural pathways. The brain is the central organ of stress and adaptation to stress because it perceives and determines what is threatening, as well as the behavioral and physiological responses to the stressor. The adult and developing brain possess remarkable structural and functional plasticity in response to stress, including neuronal replacement, dendritic remodeling, and synapse turnover. Stress causes an imbalance of neural circuitry subserving cognition, decision-making, anxiety and mood that can alter expression of those behaviors and behavioral states. This imbalance, in turn, affects systemic physiology via neuroendocrine, autonomic, immune and metabolic mediators. In the short term, as for increased fearful vigilance and anxiety in a threatening environment, these changes may be adaptive. But, if the danger passes and the behavioral state persists along with the changes in neural circuitry, such maladaptation may need intervention with a combination of pharmacological and behavioral therapies, as is the case for chronic anxiety and depression. There are important sex differences in the brain responses to stressors that are in urgent need of further exploration. Moreover, adverse early-life experience, interacting with alleles of certain genes, produce lasting effects on brain and body over the life-course via epigenetic mechanisms. While prevention is most important, the plasticity of the brain gives hope for therapies that take into consideration brain-body interactions.
    Journal of Endocrinology 05/2015; 226(2). DOI:10.1530/JOE-15-0121 · 3.72 Impact Factor
    • "The studies of circadian disruption complement those on the hippocampus/temporal lobe noted above in flight crews suffering from chronic jet lag (Cho, 2001) and raise important questions about how the brain handles shift work, jet lag and chronic sleep deprivation. Furthermore, aging in rats is associated with failure to spontaneously reverse shrinking of medial prefrontal cortical neurons after chronic stress (Bloss et al., 2010) and this harkens back to the glucocorticoid cascade hypothesis (Sapolsky et al., 1986). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the central organ of stress and adaptation to stressors, the brain plays a pivotal role in behavioral and physiological responses that may lead to successful adaptation or to pathophysiology and mental and physical disease. In this context, resilience can be defined as "achieving a positive outcome in the face of adversity". Underlying this deceptively simple statement are several questions; first, to what extent is this ability limited to those environments that have shaped the individual or can it be more flexible; second, when in the life course does the brain develop capacity for flexibility for adapting positively to new challenges; and third, can such flexibility be instated in individuals where early life experiences have limited that capacity? Brain architecture continues to show plasticity throughout adult life and studies of gene expression and epigenetic regulation reveal a dynamic and ever-changing brain. The goal is to recognize those biological changes that underlie flexible adaptability, and to recognize gene pathways, epigenetic factors and structural changes that indicate lack of resilience leading to negative outcomes, particularly when the individual is challenged by new circumstances. Early life experiences determine individual differences in such capabilities via epigenetic pathways and laying down of brain architecture that determine the later capacity for flexible adaptation or the lack thereof. Reactivation of such plasticity in individuals lacking such resilience is a new challenge for research and practical application. Finally, sex differences in the plasticity of the brain are often overlooked and must be more fully investigated.
    01/2015; 1(1):1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.001
  • Source
    • "The changes in neural and behavioural measures brought about by chronic stress in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex, but perhaps not the amygdala (Conrad et al., 1999; Vyas et al., 2004), are reversible with time (Bian et al., 2012; Dagyte et al., 2009; Heine et al., 2004; Radley et al., 2005; Sousa et al., 2000) or with new learning (Sandi et al., 2003). The capacity to recover from chronic stress, however, may diminish with advanced age (Bloss et al., 2010). The findings above involved investigations in male mice and rats, although similar results have been found for stressors in other species [e.g., hamsters, (Walton et al., 2012); tree shrews, (Fuchs et al., 2001); humans (Qin et al., 2012)]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article is part of a Special Issue "Puberty and Adolescence". Learning and memory is affected by a myriad of factors, including exposure to stressors and the corresponding rise in circulating glucocorticoids. Nevertheless, the effects of stressors depend on the sex, species, the type of stressor used, the duration of exposure, as well as the developmental time-point in which stressors are experienced. Effects of stress in adolescence, however, have received less attention than other developmental periods. In adolescence, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and brain regions involved in learning and memory, which also richly express corticosteroid receptors, are continuing to develop, and thus the effects of stress exposures would be expected to differ from those in adulthood. We conclude from a review of the available literature in animal models that hippocampal function is particularly sensitive to adolescent stressors, and the effects tend to be most evident several weeks after the exposure, suggesting stressors alter the developmental trajectory of the hippocampus.
    Hormones and Behavior 07/2013; 64(2):364-79. DOI:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.09.012 · 4.63 Impact Factor
Show more