Parental involvement in interventions to improve child dietary intake: A systematic review

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Preventive Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.93). 05/2010; 51(2):103-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Interventions that aim to improve child dietary quality and reduce disease risk often involve parents. The most effective methods to engage parents remain unclear. A systematic review of interventions designed to change child and adolescent dietary behavior was conducted to answer whether parent involvement enhanced intervention effectiveness, and what type of involvement was most effective in achieving desired outcomes.
In 2008, Pub Med, Medline, Psych Info, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify programs designed to change child and adolescent dietary intake that also involved parents. Methods of parental involvement were categorized based on the type and intensity of parental involvement. These methods were compared against intervention design, dietary outcomes, and quality of reporting (evaluated using CONSORT checklist) for each study.
The literature search identified 1774 articles and 24 met review criteria. Four studies systematically evaluated parent involvement with inconsistent results. Indirect methods to engage parents were most commonly used, although direct approaches were more likely to result in positive outcomes. Four studies met >70% of CONSORT items.
Limited conclusions may be drawn regarding the best method to involve parents in changing child diet to promote health. However, direct methods show promise and warrant further research.

Download full-text


Available from: Tom Baranowski, Jul 06, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evidence regarding effectiveness of parental support interventions targeting children's health behaviours is weak. We aimed to review: 1) Effectiveness of universal parental support interventions to promote dietary habits, physical activity (PA) or prevent overweight and obesity among children 2-18 years and 2) effectiveness in relation to family socio-economic position. Thirty five studies from 1990-2013 were identified from major databases. Quality was assessed by four criteria accounting for selection and attrition bias, fidelity to intervention, and outcome measurement methodology, categorizing studies as strong, moderate or weak. Four interventions types were identified: Face-to-face counselling, group education, information sent home, and telephone counselling. Face-to-face or telephone counselling was effective in changing children's diet, while there was only weak evidence for improvement in PA. Sending home information was not effective. Concerning body weight, group education seemed more promising than counselling. Intervention effectiveness was generally higher in younger compared to older children. In groups with low socio-economic position, group-based approaches appeared promising. In the future efforts should be made to improve reporting of intervention content, include a power calculation for the main outcome, use of high quality outcome assessment methodology, and a follow-up period of at least 6 months. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Preventive Medicine 05/2015; 77. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.05.005 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids (HDHK)’ program when delivered by trained facilitators in community settings. Method A two-arm randomized controlled trial of 93 overweight/obese fathers (mean[sd] age=40.3[5.3] years; BMI=32.5[3.8] kg/m2) and their primary school-aged children (n=132) from the Hunter Region, Australia. In 2010-2011, families were randomized to either: (i) HDHK intervention (n=48 fathers, n=72 children) or (ii) wait-list control group. The 7-week intervention included seven sessions and resources (booklets, pedometers). Assessments were held at baseline and 14-weeks with fathers’ weight (kg) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes for fathers and children included waist, BMI, blood pressure, resting heart rate, physical activity (pedometry), and self-reported dietary intake and sedentary behaviors. Results Linear mixed models (intention-to-treat) revealed significant between-group differences for fathers’ weight (P< .001, d = 0.24), with HDHK fathers losing more weight (-3.3kg; 95%CI -4.3,-2.4) than control fathers (0.1kg; 95%CI-0.9,1.0). Significant treatment effects (P< .05) were also found for fathers’ waist (d= 0.41), BMI (d= 0.26), resting heart rate (d= 0.59), energy intake (d= 0.49) and physical activity (d= 0.46) and for childrens’ physical activity (d= 0.50) and adiposity (d= 0.07). Discussion HDHK significantly improved health outcomes and behaviors in fathers and children, providing evidence for program effectiveness when delivered in a community setting.
    Preventive Medicine 01/2013; 61. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.019 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Preventive Medicine 08/2010; 51(2):101-2. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.016 · 2.93 Impact Factor