Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development

Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (HALO), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1 Canada. .
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (Impact Factor: 3.68). 05/2010; 7:42. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-42
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper describes the process used to arrive at recommended physical activity guidelines for Canadian school-aged children and youth (5-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>/=65 years).
The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) Physical Activity Measurement and Guidelines (PAMG) Steering Committee used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument to inform the guideline development process. Fourteen background papers and five systematic reviews were completed. Systematic review authors appraised and synthesized the data, and proposed specific recommendations at an international consensus conference of invited experts and key stakeholders. Independently, an international panel of experts interpreted the evidence from the systematic reviews and developed recommendations following attendance at the Consensus Conference.
Using the AGREE II instrument as a guide, specific foci for each of the guidelines were defined and systematic review methodology was used to synthesize the evidence base. The expert panel, CSEP PAMG Steering Committee and methodological consultants reviewed the systematic reviews and Consensus Statement. The expert panel achieved consensus on the level of evidence informing the physical activity guidelines and developed a separate document outlining key recommendations, interpretation of the evidence and justification of each recommendation.
The CSEP and Public Health Agency of Canada followed a rigorous process to examine the evidence informing potential revisions to existing physical activity guidelines for Canadians. It is believed that this is the first physical activity guideline development process in the world to be guided and assessed by AGREE II and AMSTAR instruments.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La Société canadienne de physiologie de l’exercice (SCPE) en collaboration avec plusieurs partenaires, intervenants concernés et chercheurs a élaboré les premières directives canadiennes en matière de comportement sédentaire à l’intention des enfants âgés de 0 à 4 ans. Ces directives nationales répondent à une demande des praticiens en santé, des personnes qui prennent soin des enfants et en condition physique désireux d’avoir des directives au sujet du comportement sédentaire durant la petite enfance. L’élaboration des directives a respecté la Grille II d’évaluation de la qualité des recommandations pour la pratique clinique (AGREE). Les recommandations présentées dans cet article sont basées sur les données probantes d’une analyse documentaire systématique portant sur les relations entre le comportement sédentaire (surtout le temps passé devant un écran) et des indicateurs de santé (poids santé, santé des os et du squelette, développement des habiletés motrices, santé psychosociale, développement cognitif et facteurs de risque de maladie cardiométabolique) chez les nourrissons (âgés de Keywords: comportement sédentaire; enfants d’âge préscolaire; infants; nourrissons; preschoolers; recommandations; recommendations; sedentary behaviour; toddlers; tout-petits Document Type: Research Article DOI: Affiliations: 1: Groupe de recherche sur les saines habitudes de vie et l’obésité, Institut de recherche du CHEO, Université d’Ottawa, 401, rue Smyth, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada. 2: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Université Queen’s, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. 3: Centre de ressources Meilleur départ, Nexus Santé, 180, rue Dundas Ouest, bureau 301, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8, Canada. 4: Agence de santé publique du Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. 5: Department of Kinesiology, Université McMaster, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. 6: Société canadienne de physiologie de l’exercice, 18, rue Louisa, bureau 370, Ottawa, ON K1R 6Y6, Canada. 7: KFL&A Public Health, 221, av. Portsmouth, Kingston, ON K7M 1V5, Canada. 8: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Université Queen’s, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. 9: Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. 10: L’Hôpital de Montréal pour enfants, 2300, rue Tupper, Montréal, QC H3H 1P3, Canada. 11: ParticipACTION, 2, rue Bloor Est, bureau 1804, Toronto, ON M4W 1A8, Canada. 12: Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. 13: Physical Activity for Health Group, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Jordanhill Campus, Glasgow, G13 1PP Scotland. 14: Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, Université de l’Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, Canada. 15: Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. Publication date: April 27, 2012 More about this publication? This bimonthly journal has a 30-year history of publishing, first as the Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, and later as the Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. It publishes original research articles, reviews, and commentaries, focussing on the application of physiology, nutrition, and metabolism to the study of human health, physical activity, and fitness. The published research, reviews, and symposia will be of interest to exercise physiologists, physical fitness and exercise rehabilitation specialists, public health and health care professionals, as well as basic and applied physiologists, nutritionists, and biochemists. Information for Authors Submit a Paper Subscribe to this Title Terms & Conditions Sample Issue Reprints & Permissions ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites $(document).ready(function() { var shortdescription = $(".originaldescription").text().replace(/\\&/g, '&').replace(/\\, '<').replace(/\\>/g, '>').replace(/\\t/g, ' ').replace(/\\n/g, ''); if (shortdescription.length > 350){ shortdescription = "" + shortdescription.substring(0,250) + "... more"; } $(".descriptionitem").prepend(shortdescription); $(".shortdescription a").click(function() { $(".shortdescription").hide(); $(".originaldescription").slideDown(); return false; }); }); Related content In this: publication By this: publisher In this Subject: Nutrition & Food , Anatomy & Physiology By this author: Tremblay, Mark S. ; LeBlanc, Allana G. ; Carson, Valerie ; Choquette, Louise ; Connor Gorber, Sarah ; Dillman, Carrie ; Duggan, Mary ; Gordon, Mary Jane ; Hicks, Audrey ; Janssen, Ian ; Kho, Michelle E. ; Latimer-Cheung, Amy E. ; LeBlanc, Claire ; Murumets, Kelly ; Okely, Anthony D. ; Reilly, John J. ; Stearns, Jodie A. ; Timmons, Brian W. ; Spence, John C. GA_googleFillSlot("Horizontal_banner_bottom");
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 04/2012; 37(2). DOI:10.1139/h2012-029 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the context of what has been termed a childhood obesity epidemic, public health institutions have recently begun to promote active play as a means of addressing childhood obesity, thus advancing play for health. Drawing on Foucault, this article problematises the way that children's play is being taken up as a health practice and further considers some of the effects this may have for children. Six Canadian public health websites were examined, from which 150 documents addressing children's health, physical activity, obesity, leisure activities and play were selected and coded deductively (theoretical themes) and inductively (emerging themes). Bacchi's () question-posing approach to critical discourse analysis deepened our analysis of dominant narratives. Our findings suggest that several taken-for-granted assumptions and practices underlie this discourse: (i) play is viewed as a productive activity legitimises it as a health practice; (ii) tropes of 'fun' and 'pleasure' are drawn on to promote physical activity; (iii) children are encouraged to self-govern their leisure time to promote health. We underscore the need to recognise this discourse as contingent and as only one of many ways of conceptualising children's leisure activities and their health and social lives more generally.
    Sociology of Health & Illness 06/2014; DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12158 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: (1) To examine how sedentary behaviour and moderate-vigorous (MVPA) are each experienced during the day across different levels of frailty; (2) estimate and compare the extent to which high levels of sedentary behaviour and low levels of MVPA are associated with increased frailty and self-reported health, disability and healthcare utilization. Community dwelling adults aged 50+ from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003-2004; 2005-2006). Frailty was measured with the frailty index and physical activity was measured using ActiGraph accelerometers. On average, people engaged in about 8.5h of sedentary behaviour each day. The most frail individuals were more sedentary and less likely to meet weekly MVPA guidelines (9.57h/day; 8.3%) than non-frail individuals (8.18h/day; 1.1%; p<0.001). Frail individuals failed to demonstrate the patterns of the healthier individuals-higher levels of sedentary behaviour on Sundays and in the evenings and decreasing MVPA throughout the week. High sedentary behaviour and low MVPA were independently associated with higher levels of frailty, poor self-reported health, high ADL disability and higher healthcare usage. Many people over the age of 50, and most of those who are frail, were highly sedentary with very few meeting the recommended weekly levels of MVPA. Sedentary behaviour and MVPA were independently associated with frailty and adverse health outcomes in middle to older aged adults. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to determine the temporal relationship between sedentary behaviour and frailty. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Maturitas 11/2014; 80(2). DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.11.010 · 2.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Sep 9, 2014