Article

What's behind the mask? A look at blood flow changes with prolonged facial pressure and expression using laser Doppler imaging.

Burn Center, Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC 20010, USA.
Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association (Impact Factor: 1.54). 01/2010; 31(3):441-7. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db5250
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinically, the initial blanching in burn scar seen on transparent plastic face mask application seems to diminish with time and movement requiring mask alteration. To date, studies quantifying perfusion with prolonged mask use do not exist. This study used laser Doppler imaging (LDI) to assess perfusion through the transparent face mask and movement in subjects with and without burn over time. Five subjects fitted with transparent face masks were scanned with the LDI on four occasions. The four subjects without burn were scanned in the following manner: 1) no mask, 2) mask on while at rest, 3) mask on with alternating intervals of sustained facial expression and rest, and 4) after mask removal. Images were acquired every 3 minutes throughout the 85-minute study period. The subject with burn underwent a shortened scanning protocol to increase comfort. Each face was divided into five regions of interest for analysis. Compared with baseline, mask application decreased perfusion significantly in all subjects (P < .0001). Perfusion did not change during the rest period. There were no significant differences with changing facial expression in any of the regions of interest. On mask removal, all regions of the face demonstrated a hyperemic effect with the chin (P = .05) and each cheek (P < .0001) reaching statistical significance. Perfusion levels did not return to baseline in the chin and cheeks after 30 minutes of mask removal. Perfusions remain constantly low while wearing the face mask, despite changing facial expressions. Changing facial expressions with the mask on did not alter perfusion. Hyperemic response occurs on removal of the mask. This study exposed methodology and statistical issues worth considering when conducting future research with the face, pressure therapy, and with LDI technology.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
84 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Transparent Face Orthosis (TFO) is widely used in the treatment of facial burns to minimize hypertrophic scarring and maintain the contours of the face against deforming scars. Compression of the TFO is achieved with forces provided by the harness system (straps and anchors) used to secure the TFO on the face. A variety of harness system designs are used clinically yet none have been described or compared in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare seven common methods of TFO harnessing including cost, time, and ease of fabrication. Results showed that harness systems vary in cost from $0.22 to 96.45 and take 2-49min to fabricate. The 4-point harness was the least expensive and the easiest harness to fabricate. The Beanie Cap harness was the most complex system to make, while the Open Mask Stabilizer was the most expensive. The systems resulted in varying distributions of compression when depicted with three-dimensional laser scanned images. This description and comparison of fabrication materials and methods for TFO harnessing can guide clinicians within the burn community worldwide who have varying skills and resources for facial scar management.
    Burns: journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 12/2012; · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypertrophic burn scars pose a challenge for burn survivors and providers. In many cases, they can severely limit a burn survivor's level of function, including work and recreational activities. A widespread modality of prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring is the utilization of pressure garment therapy (PGT). Despite the magnitude of the problem of hypertrophic scarring and the ubiquitous use of pressure garments as therapy, strong clinical evidence of the efficacy of PGT in the literature is lacking. Some of the challenges facing measurement of efficacy of PGT on hypertrophic scarring are lack of clear definitions for degree of hypertrophic scarring, inability to quantify pressure applied to scars, patient noncompliance to strict PGT time schedules, and inability to conduct randomized controlled trials comparing PGT to no therapy for ethical reasons since PGT is considered a standard of care. In this review, we attempt to summarize and analyze evidence-based literature on PGT and its efficacy in burn hypertrophic scars published in English language in the past 15 years.
    The Annals of Fires and Burn Disaster 12/2013; 26(4):205-212.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective. Glass-fiber reinforced composite has been suggested to be used as framework material in silicone elastomer facial prostheses. The glass-fiber reinforced framework makes it possible to make the margin of the prosthesis very tight, so that it will lean tightly against the skin even during facial expressions and jaw movements. The purpose of this study was to study how the compression of the glass-fiber reinforced framework would affect the microcirculation of the facial skin. Materials and methods. A face mask, with a compression pad corresponding to the outer margin of a glass fiber-reinforced composite framework beam of a facial prosthesis, was used to apply pressure on the facial skin of healthy volunteers. The skin blood flow during touch, light and moderate compression of the skin was measured by laser Doppler imaging technique. Results. None of the compressions had any marked effects on local skin blood flow. No significant differences between the blood flow of the compressed skin, compared to the baseline values, were found. Conclusions. The pressure applied to the skin by the tight margins of a facial prosthesis, fabricated with a framework of glass-fiber reinforced composite, does not remarkably alter the skin blood flow.
    Acta odontologica Scandinavica 07/2013; · 1.41 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from