A qualitative evaluation of a health literacy intervention to improve medication adherence for underserved pharmacy patients.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health (RSPH), Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (Impact Factor: 1.1). 01/2010; 21(2):559-67. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0283
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the implementation of a health literacy intervention to improve medication adherence among patients in an inner-city health system.
Interviews with pharmacists and focus groups with pharmacy patients were conducted one month and six months after beginning the intervention. Patients and pharmacists described their experiences with the intervention, consisting of an automated telephone call reminder system, an illustrated medication schedule, and pharmacist training in clear health communication.
Despite initial technical problems, patients and pharmacists reported positive experiences. Pharmacists thought the intervention made counseling easier. Patients appreciated the design and portability of the illustrated medication schedule and found the reminder calls helpful as well.
Successful health literacy interventions require tools that are easy to comprehend, accessible, and personalized to the special needs and interests of the target population. Moreover, providers must be well-trained, and adequate resources must be provided to assure the fidelity of the intervention's implementation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article explores the influence of health literacy on medication adherence. With health literacy skills nearly flat for over a decade and an aging population receiving multiple and complex medication regimens, literacy is becoming a more important factor in nursing assessment and intervention. Concrete tools are provided to help the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) assess literacy and evaluate written resources for patient education and to improve medication adherence.
    Clinical nurse specialist CNS 11/2013; 27(6):286-288. DOI:10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182a872f9 · 0.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient education and warnings have emerged as prominent interventions for improving drug safety. As part of the provision of information and guidance on safe use of drugs, patients often receive multiple pieces of written information when they obtain a prescription medication, including a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-mandated medication guide (MG), consumer medication information (CMI), and patient package insert (PPI). To determine whether patients understand the materials providing drug information and whether the materials convey the intended information. Fifty-two adults with a high school education or less were shown an actual (blinded) MG, CMI, and PPI for a marketed antidepressant medication. Comprehension was tested with methods used by the FDA to assess label comprehension for nonprescription products. The majority of participants (88.2%) looked at all 3 pieces of information provided. The mean (SD) time spent reviewing the CMI was 5.2 (4.8) minutes (range 0-21.9), 16.5 (13.3) minutes for the PPI (range 0-43.0), and 2.5 (1.6) minutes for the MG (range 0-7.6). Less than 20% of participants were able to identify the symptoms of a rare but potentially life-threatening situation that can occur with this medication and only 61.5% recalled the risk of teen suicide, which is the sole focus of the MG. Respondents with lower literacy scores performed more poorly than those with higher literacy scores. Information provided with at least some prescription drugs is not adequately understood by less-educated consumers and does not effectively communicate critical safety messages or directions.
    Annals of Pharmacotherapy 03/2011; 45(4):452-8. DOI:10.1345/aph.1P477 · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    P&T 09/2011; 36(9):576-89. · 1.07 Impact Factor