Contexts of tobacco use and perspectives on smoking cessation among a sample of urban American Indians.

Friends Research Institute (FRI), Social Research Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (Impact Factor: 1.1). 01/2010; 21(2):544-58. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0276
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT American Indians have the highest prevalence of cigarette use in the United States, but there is a shortage of knowledge about American Indians' own perspectives on smoking and cessation. The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study was to obtain information on American Indians' views that would be useful for subsequent intervention planning and development. Four focus groups were conducted with urban American Indians living in Maryland to explore the sociocultural contexts of tobacco use and their perspectives on various mainstream and culturally-specific smoking cessation strategies and service delivery models. Tobacco interventions targeting American Indians should increase service access, address negative experiences with medications, emphasize empowerment for behavior change, explicitly distinguish ceremonial tobacco from cigarette use, and send culturally-relevant messages. Smoking cessation programs and health promotion efforts may be perceived as more relevant by the target population if they incorporate an understanding of the social and cultural facets of smoking behavior.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: American Indians have the highest smoking rates in the United States, yet few randomized controlled trials of culturally specific interventions exist. This study assessed American Indians' opinions about evidence-based treatment and attitudes toward participating in clinical trials. Six focus groups were conducted based on smoking status (current/former smoker), sex, and elder status (55 years and older or younger). Meetings were held at local American Indian community organizations. This project was accomplished in partnership with the American Indian Community Tobacco Projects, a community-academic research partnership at the University of Minnesota. Thematic qualitative data analyses were conducted. Participants desired the following: (a) programs led by trained American Indian community members, (b) the opportunity to connect with other American Indian smokers interested in quitting, and (c) programs promoting healthy lifestyles. Strategies desired for treatment included (a) free pharmacotherapy, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT); (b) nominal incentives, e.g., gift cards for groceries; and (c) culturally specific program components such as American Indian images, education on traditional tobacco use, and quit-smoking messages that target the value of family and include narratives or story telling in recruitment and program materials. Biochemical verification of smoking abstinence, such as salivary cotinine or carbon monoxide breathalyzers, is likely acceptable. Standard treatment or delayed treatment control groups were viewed as potentially acceptable for randomized study designs. Rigorously conducted randomized controlled trials of culturally specific smoking cessation interventions are sorely needed but will only be accomplished with the commitment of funders, researchers, and collaborative trusting relationships with the community.
    Nicotine & Tobacco Research 07/2013; DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntt111 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Significant advances in tobacco cessation and prevention initiatives have occurred over recent years, yet smoking amongst Indigenous populations remain double that of the relevant non-Indigenous population. As such tobacco use is considered a significant risk factor contributing to health disparities among these populations. Two Cochrane systematic reviews, one evaluating tobacco cessation and the other tobacco prevention initiatives for Indigenous populations summarise the available evidence for use by policy makers, researchers and consumers alike. Culturally tailored tobacco cessation initiatives show evidence of long-term abstinence, however, both cessation and prevention initiatives specifically designed in collaboration with Indigenous cohorts are lacking. Despite the significant health burden attributed to tobacco use including the development of tobacco related illnesses and associated economic expenditures, there remains a paucity of data in this field. Methodologically rigorous collaborative research is needed to highlight the barriers and facilitators for tobacco cessation and prevention programs in order to effectively reduce the prevalence of tobacco use and subsequent co-morbidities. NOTE: This chapter (text, tables and figures) contain excerpts from articles published previously. Please refer to Carson and colleagues (2012a, 2012b and 2012c) in the reference list at the end of this chapter.
    Health Disparities: Epidemiology, Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Risk Factors and Strategies for Elimination, 1 edited by Owen T. Jackson, Kathleen A. Evan, 06/2013: chapter 1: pages 1-38; Nova Publishers., ISBN: 978-1-62618-570-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify barriers that are common and unique to six selected vulnerable groups: low socioeconomic status; Indigenous; mental illness and substance abuse; homeless; prisoners; and at-risk youth. A systematic review was carried out to identify the perceived barriers to smoking cessation within six vulnerable groups. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo were searched using keywords and MeSH terms from each database's inception published prior to March 2014. Studies that provided either qualitative or quantitative (ie, longitudinal, cross-sectional or cohort surveys) descriptions of self-reported perceived barriers to quitting smoking in one of the six aforementioned vulnerable groups were included. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. 65 eligible papers were identified: 24 with low socioeconomic groups, 16 with Indigenous groups, 18 involving people with a mental illness, 3 with homeless groups, 2 involving prisoners and 1 involving at-risk youth. One study identified was carried out with participants who were homeless and addicted to alcohol and/or other drugs. Barriers common to all vulnerable groups included: smoking for stress management, lack of support from health and other service providers, and the high prevalence and acceptability of smoking in vulnerable communities. Unique barriers were identified for people with a mental illness (eg, maintenance of mental health), Indigenous groups (eg, cultural and historical norms), prisoners (eg, living conditions), people who are homeless (eg, competing priorities) and at-risk youth (eg, high accessibility of tobacco). Vulnerable groups experience common barriers to smoking cessation, in addition to barriers that are unique to specific vulnerable groups. Individual-level, community-level and social network-level interventions are priority areas for future smoking cessation interventions within vulnerable groups. A protocol for this review has been registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Identifier: CRD42013005761). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to
    BMJ Open 12/2014; 4(12):e006414. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006414 · 2.06 Impact Factor