Human papillomavirus in the etiology of head and neck carcinomas.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, Olomouc 77900, Czech Republic.
Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia (Impact Factor: 1.66). 03/2010; 154(1):9-12. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2010.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For more than 20 years, infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV) has been of a matter of interest not only to gynecologists but also to maxillofacial surgeons and othorhinolaryngologists. HPV is generally known to be involved in cervical cancer. Recently, there are many clinical studies pointed out the potentially dangerous connection between HPV infection and head and neck carcinomas (HNC). HPV infection was identified as a possible etiological factor in 15-30% of HNC.
Aim of this article is to summarize the recent knowledge about the HPV infection with regards to etiology of head and neck cancer.
It has been proven that HPV infection is related to development of head and neck cancer and that the sexual behavior has played an important role in the viral transmission. HNC of viral etiology have been observed mostly in younger people; their curability is difficult and prognosis serious.
Beside the well known correlation between developing of new head and neck cancer and bad habits (smoking, alcohol abuse, poor oral hygiene etc.) we should take into consideration the sexual promiscuity and alternative sexual practices. Vaccination against cervical cancer, recommended to young women, should be extended to their male partners to prevent the virus transmission and decrease the HNC incidence.

Download full-text


Available from: Petr Michl, Jun 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The human papilloma viruses (HPVs) are known to be causal factors in the development malign tumors. The study investigates a smear test, routinely used in gynecology for HPV-diagnosis in cervical lesions, for oral HPV-detection. The procedure is evaluated and the reliability and potential failures are evaluated. The Digene Cervical Sampler HC2 Hybrid Capture® procedure represents a reliable and low-price method in the diagnosis of high and low risk oral HPV-infection.
    Stomatologie 06/2012; 109(4-5):35-39. DOI:10.1007/s00715-012-0154-4
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if lymph node imaging findings can predict human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scans of 49 patients (male, 35; female, 14; age range, 45-76 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal malignancies and with available HPV data were retrospectively reviewed. Metastatic lymph nodes were identified based on standardly accepted size and morphological criteria. Various lymph node parameters were studied, including presence of cystic foci in the metastatic lymph nodes, abnormal lymph nodes showing low-attenuation foci, matted lymph nodes, and morphologically normal smaller (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes. These parameters were then independently correlated with the available HPV status of these patients. Finally, an extended criterion, that is, intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes, was correlated with HPV status. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated. RESULTS: Of these 49 cases with oropharyngeal cancers, 27 were HPV positive, and 22 cases were HPV negative. Eight cases (3 HPV positive and 5 HPV negative) did not have metastatic lymph nodes. Of remaining 41 cases with metastatic abnormal lymph nodes, 26 were HPV positive, and 15 were HPV negative. Of these 41 cases with metastatic lymph nodes, 14 had 1 or more lymph nodes with cystic foci. Of these 14 cases, 10 (71.4%) were HPV positive. Resultant sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of cystic foci for the presence of HPV status were 38.4%, 73.3%, 71.4%, and 40.7%, respectively. Intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes were found in 5 cases; all 5 were HPV positive. Resultant accuracy was specificity and PPV of 100%, sensitivity of 19.2% and NPV of 41.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Intranodal cystic changes seen on the pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scan of patients with oropharyngeal malignancies are radiologic signatures strongly associated with the HPV status of the patient. The results in this initial study warrant larger prospective studies to determine if this finding may be used in addition to other molecular biomarkers to help identify those patients who may be amenable to the most appropriate treatment options.
    Journal of computer assisted tomography 05/2013; 37(3):343-345. DOI:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318282d7c3 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Erythropoietin (EPO) has long been recognized as the major hematopoietic cytokine regulating normal erythropoiesis. Moreover, there is a growing interest in the non-erythropoietic, tissue-protective effects of EPO. Because of its potential to correct anemia, EPO has been increasingly prescribed to cancer patients. However, although recombinant human Epo (rHuEPO) significantly reduces the risk for red blood cell transfusions in cancer patients, recent clinical studies have reported decreased survival and disease control following rHuEPO treatment in patients with different cancer types. The issue of EPOR expression in tumor cells is critical in this respect. The expression of EPOR in tumor cells raises the possibility that exogenous rHuEPO may directly influence tumor growth or sensitivity to chemo-radiation therapy. In addition, EPOR expression in endothelial cells suggests what potential effects EPO may have on tumor capillaries, such as the stimulation of angiogenesis. However, as experimental studies reveal, the overall direct effect of EPO-EPOR signaling on cancer progression and therapy is not a straightforward one. The current paper provides an update on the biology of EPO, and discusses its utility in the treatment of cancer patients.
    Current Molecular Medicine 10/2008; 8(6):481-91. DOI:10.2174/156652408785747979 · 3.61 Impact Factor