Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Isolates from Retail Chicken Meat Compared with Human Clinical Isolates

Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120, USA.
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease (Impact Factor: 1.91). 05/2010; 7(8):929-34. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0499
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella in chicken meat and correlate with isolates from ill humans.
We isolated Salmonella from raw chicken purchased from a randomly selected sample of retail outlets in central Pennsylvania during 2006-2007. Salmonella isolates from meat were compared, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, to isolates in the PulseNet database of Salmonella recovered from humans.
Of 378 chicken meat samples, 84 (22%) contained Salmonella. Twenty-six (31%) of the Salmonella isolates were resistant to > or = 3 antimicrobials and 18 (21%) were resistant to ceftiofur. All ceftiofur-resistant isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility (minimum inhibitory concentration >2 microg/mL) to ceftriaxone and carried a bla(CMY) gene, as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Among the 28 Salmonella serovar Typhimurium isolates, 20 (71.4%) were resistant to > or = 3 antimicrobials and 12 (42.9%) were resistant to ceftiofur. One ceftiofur-resistant Salmonella serovar Typhimurium poultry isolate exhibited a rare pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern indistinguishable from a human isolate in PulseNet; both isolates carried the bla(CMY-2) gene.
These data demonstrate the presence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in poultry meat, including bla(CMY) plasmid-mediated genes that confer resistance to both ceftiofur, used in poultry, and ceftriaxone, used for treating salmonellosis in humans. This study illustrates the potential for molecular subtyping databases to identify related Salmonella isolates from meat and ill humans, and suggests that chicken could be a source for multidrug-resistant salmonellosis in humans.

Download full-text


Available from: Carol H. Sandt, Jan 07, 2015
1 Follower
50 Reads
  • Source
    • "However, no homology was found between the Salmonella and the chicken genome. The hybridization could possibly be a result of very low background microflora that may be present on the chicken sample [31]. Therefore, our study indicates that while using a poultry model for Salmonella transcriptional profiling experiments, the interference from chicken nucleic acids is very minimal. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been increased interest in the study of molecular survival mechanisms expressed by foodborne pathogens present on food surfaces. Determining genomic responses of these pathogens to antimicrobials is of particular interest since this helps to understand antimicrobial effects at the molecular level. Assessment of bacterial gene expression by transcriptomic analysis in response to these antimicrobials would aid prediction of the phenotypic behavior of the bacteria in the presence of antimicrobials. However, before transcriptional profiling approaches can be implemented routinely, it is important to develop an optimal method to consistently recover pathogens from the food surface and ensure optimal quality RNA so that the corresponding gene expression analysis represents the current response of the organism. Another consideration is to confirm that there is no interference from the "background" food or meat matrix that could mask the bacterial response. Our study involved developing a food model system using chicken breast meat inoculated with mid-log Salmonella cells. First, we tested the optimum number of Salmonella cells required on the poultry meat in order to extract high quality RNA. This was analyzed by inoculating 10-fold dilutions of Salmonella on the chicken samples followed by RNA extraction. Secondly, we tested the effect of two different bacterial cell recovery solutions namely 0.1% peptone water and RNAprotect (Qiagen Inc.) on the RNA yield and purity. In addition, we compared the efficiency of sonication and bead beater methods to break the cells for RNA extraction. To check chicken nucleic acid interference on downstream Salmonella microarray experiments both chicken and Salmonella cDNA labeled with different fluorescent dyes were mixed together and hybridized on a single Salmonella array. Results of this experiment did not show any cross-hybridization signal from the chicken nucleic acids. In addition, we demonstrated the application of this method in a meat model transcriptional profiling experiment by studying the transcriptomic response of Salmonella inoculated on chicken meat and exposed to d-limonene. We successfully applied our method in this experiment to recover the bacterial cells from the meat matrix and to extract the RNA. We obtained high yield and pure RNA. Subsequently, the RNA was used for downstream transcriptional profiling studies using microarrays and over 600 differentially regulated genes were identified. Our result showed that 8 log cfu/g of Salmonella is ideal to obtain optimal RNA amount and purity. Our results demonstrated that RNAprotect yielded higher RNA amounts (approximately 10 to 30 fold) when compared to 0.1% peptone water. The differences between the RNAprotect and 0.1% peptone samples were significant at a p-value of 0.03 for the bead beater method and 0.0005 for the sonication method, respectively. The microarray experiment demonstrated that the chicken samples do not interfere with the hybridization of Salmonella cDNA on the array slide. Hence, the background chicken RNA will not interfere with the microarray analysis when poultry meat models are used. Finally, we successfully demonstrated the application of the poultry meat model proposed in this study by conducting transcriptional profiling analysis of Salmonella inoculated on the poultry. Results of this study proved that this method has the potential to be employed in other meat model studies.
    BMC Research Notes 03/2011; 4(1):60. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-4-60
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two types of new effective instruments for recovering the visual strain of the VDT operator caused by continuous VDT operations are described. Both the instrument for measuring the achromatic color using the complementary color and the instrument for measuring the recovery of the visual accommodation function using the picture of virtual far point, are developed. These two kinds of instruments are useful for the recovery of visual strain
    Industrial Electronics Society, 2000. IECON 2000. 26th Annual Confjerence of the IEEE; 02/2000
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The industrialization of food animal production, specifically the widespread use of antimicrobials, not only increased pressure on microbial populations, but also changed the ecosystems in which antimicrobials and bacteria interact. In this review, we argue that industrial food animal production (IFAP) is appropriately defined as an anthropogenic ecosystem. This paper uses an ecosystem perspective to frame an examination of these changes in the context of U.S. broiler chicken production. This perspective emphasizes multiple modes by which IFAP has altered microbiomes and also suggests a means of generating hypotheses for understanding and predicting the ecological impacts of IFAP in terms of the resistome and the flow of resistance within and between microbiomes.
    Current opinion in microbiology 06/2011; 14(3):244-50. DOI:10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.003 · 5.90 Impact Factor
Show more