Radioimmunotherapy with radioactive nanoparticles: Biological doses and treatment efficiency for vascularized tumors with or without a central hypoxic area

Research Center in Physics of Matter and Radiation, Laboratoire d'Analyses par Réactions Nucléaires, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium.
Medical Physics (Impact Factor: 2.64). 04/2010; 37(4):1826-39. DOI: 10.1118/1.3368599
Source: PubMed


Radioactive atoms attached to monoclonal antibodies are used in radioimmunotherapy to treat cancer while limiting radiation to healthy tissues. One limitation of this method is that only one radioactive atom is linked to each antibody and the deposited dose is often insufficient to eradicate solid and radioresistant tumors. In a previous study, simulations with the Monte Carlo N-Particle eXtended code showed that physical doses up to 50 Gy can be delivered inside tumors by replacing the single radionuclide by a radioactive nanoparticle of 5 nm diameter containing hundreds of radioactive atoms. However, tumoral and normal tissues are not equally sensitive to radiation, and previous works did not take account the biological effects such as cellular repair processes or the presence of less radiosensitive cells such as hypoxic cells.
The idea is to adapt the linear-quadratic expression to the tumor model and to determine biological effective doses (BEDs) delivered through and around a tumor. This BED is then incorporated into a Poisson formula to determine the shell control probability (SCP) which predicts the cell cluster-killing efficiency at different distances "r" from the center of the tumor. BED and SCP models are used to analyze the advantages of injecting radioactive nanoparticles instead of a single radionuclide per vector in radioimmunotherapy.
Calculations of BED and SCP for different distances r from the center of a solid tumor, using the non-small-cell lung cancer as an example, were investigated for 90Y2O3 nanoparticles. With a total activity of about 3.5 and 20 MBq for tumor radii of 0.5 and 1.0 cm, respectively, results show that a very high BED is deposited in the well oxygenated part of the spherical carcinoma.
For either small or large solid tumors, BED and SCP calculations highlight the important benefit in replacing the single beta-emitter 90Y attached to each antibody by a 90Y2O3 nanoparticle.

Download full-text


Available from: Virginie Bouchat,
  • Source
    • "Bouchat et al. modeled Y-90 labeled antibody biodistribution by Monte Carlo code and showed that RIT would not result in tumor doses sufficient to treat solid tumors such as lung cancer (biological effective dose < 60 Gy). Using a similar modeling system, they showed that radioactive nanoparticles with ~100 Y-90 atoms per nanoparticle can substantially increase the biologic effective dose deposited to a solid tumor (Bouchat et al. 2010). Additionally, radioisotopes that are usually insoluble in body fluids can be encapsulated within nanoparticles, allowing them to be sequestered until delivery at the target (Khan et al. 2008). "

    Radioisotopes - Applications in Bio-Medical Science, 11/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-748-2
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The accuracy in the dosimetry for radionuclide therapy shows a great contrast to that obtained in external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetry for [(90)Y-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)] octreotide is evaluated in patients to see whether the accuracy of the dosimetry is high enough to distinguish the probability for radiation nephropathy. The 5% threshold for late end-point nephropathy at 23 Gy with external beam radiotherapy becomes with (90)Y therapy at least 30-35 Gy, when it is given in three or more fractions. More accurate linear-quadratic (LQ) model parameters are, however, needed to predict a more precise threshold for renal damage in this dose rate region. The average MIRD-based dose to the kidneys was 27 +/- 4 Gy (N = 52) with no evidence for renal damage. The variance in the dose is only caused by the high variability in renal uptake kinetics of the compound. Using the actual kidney volumes instead of the phantom values lowered the kidney dose considerably, but the variance in the dose greatly increased. As the peptide specifically localizes in the kidney cortex, the dose to the cortex increased up to a factor 1.5 compared to the MIRD whole kidney dose. Both the sum of uncertainties of ? 40% in the actual dose to the kidneys and the unknown maximum tolerable kidney dose for internal therapy make that a fixed injected activity of 13.32 GBq together with a patient-averaged dosimetry is as good as patient-kinetics specific dosimetry using the MIRD method.
    Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals 09/2003; 18(4):619-25. DOI:10.1089/108497803322287718 · 1.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the radiopharmaceutical therapy approach to the fight against cancer, in particular when it comes to translating laboratory results to the clinical setting, modeling has served as an invaluable tool for guidance and for understanding the processes operating at the cellular level and how these relate to macroscopic observables. Tumor control probability (TCP) is the dosimetric end point quantity of choice which relates to experimental and clinical data: it requires knowledge of individual cellular absorbed doses since it depends on the assessment of the treatment's ability to kill each and every cell. Macroscopic tumors, seen in both clinical and experimental studies, contain too many cells to be modeled individually in Monte Carlo simulation; yet, in particular for low ratios of decays to cells, a cell-based model that does not smooth away statistical considerations associated with low activity is a necessity. The authors present here an adaptation of the simple sphere-based model from which cellular level dosimetry for macroscopic tumors and their end point quantities, such as TCP, may be extrapolated more reliably. Ten homogenous spheres representing tumors of different sizes were constructed in GEANT4. The radionuclide 131I was randomly allowed to decay for each model size and for seven different ratios of number of decays to number of cells, N(r): 1000, 500, 200, 100, 50, 20, and 10 decays per cell. The deposited energy was collected in radial bins and divided by the bin mass to obtain the average bin absorbed dose. To simulate a cellular model, the number of cells present in each bin was calculated and an absorbed dose attributed to each cell equal to the bin average absorbed dose with a randomly determined adjustment based on a Gaussian probability distribution with a width equal to the statistical uncertainty consistent with the ratio of decays to cells, i.e., equal to Nr-1/2. From dose volume histograms the surviving fraction of cells, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and TCP for the different scenarios were calculated. Comparably sized spherical models containing individual spherical cells (15 microm diameter) in hexagonal lattices were constructed, and Monte Carlo simulations were executed for all the same previous scenarios. The dosimetric quantities were calculated and compared to the adjusted simple sphere model results. The model was then applied to the Bortezomib-induced enzyme-targeted radiotherapy (BETR) strategy of targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-expressing cancers. The TCP values were comparable to within 2% between the adjusted simple sphere and full cellular models. Additionally, models were generated for a nonuniform distribution of activity, and results were compared between the adjusted spherical and cellular models with similar comparability. The TCP values from the experimental macroscopic tumor results were consistent with the experimental observations for BETR-treated 1 g EBV-expressing lymphoma tumors in mice. The adjusted spherical model presented here provides more accurate TCP values than simple spheres, on par with full cellular Monte Carlo simulations while maintaining the simplicity of the simple sphere model. This model provides a basis for complementing and understanding laboratory and clinical results pertaining to radiopharmaceutical therapy.
    Medical Physics 06/2011; 38(6):2892-903. DOI:10.1118/1.3576051 · 2.64 Impact Factor
Show more