Article

Hypermethylation of the progesterone receptor A in constitutive antiprogestin-resistant mouse mammary carcinomas.

Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Institute of Experimental Biology and Medicine (IBYME), National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Vuelta de Obligado 2490, C1428ADN, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (Impact Factor: 4.2). 05/2010; 126(2):319-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0908-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Most breast carcinomas that are estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive respond initially to an endocrine therapy, but over time, they develop resistance (acquired hormone resistance). Others, however, fail to respond from the beginning (constitutive resistance). Overcoming hormone resistance is one of the major desirable aims in breast cancer treatment. Using the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)-induced breast cancer mouse model, we have previously demonstrated that antiprogestin-responsive tumors show a higher expression level of PR isoform A (PRA) than PR isoform B (PRB), while tumors with constitutive or acquired resistance show a higher expression level of PRB. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PRA silencing in resistant tumors was due to PRA methylation. The CpG islands located in the PRA promoter and the first exon were studied by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in six different tumors: two antiprogestin-responsive, two constitutive-resistant, and two with acquired resistance. Only in constitutive-resistant tumors, PRA expression was silenced by DNA methylation. Next, we evaluated the effect of a demethylating agent, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, on PRA expression and antiprogestin responsiveness. In constitutive-resistant tumors, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment in vitro and in vivo restored PRA expression and antiprogestin RU-486 responsiveness. Furthermore, high levels of DNA methyltransferase (Dnmts) 1 and 3b were detected in these tumors. In conclusion, our results suggest that methyltransferase inhibitors in combination with antiprogestins may be effective in the treatment of constitutive-resistant carcinomas with a high DNA methyltransferase level.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sandra Fernandez, Jun 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ERα and PR levels are critical determinants for breast cancer prognosis and response to endocrine therapy. Although PR is known to be silenced by methylation of its promoter, few studies have correlated methylation with PR levels and outcome in breast cancer. There is only one previous small study comparing methylation of the two PR isoforms, PRA and PRB, which are expressed from different promoters, and finally, there is no prior knowledge of associations between isoform-specific methylation and outcome. We conducted a cohort-based study to test for associations between PRA and PRB methylation, expression, and clinical outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients (n = 500), and in patients who underwent surgery only (n = 500). Methylation and PR levels were measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing and ligand-binding assay, respectively. Low PR levels were significantly associated with worse outcome in all patients. PRA and PRB promoters were methylated in 9.6% and 14.1% of the breast tumors, respectively. The majority (74%) of PR-negative tumors were not methylated despite the significant inverse correlation of methylation and PR levels. PRA methylation was significantly associated with PRB methylation, although a subset of tumors had PRA only (3.9%) or PRB only (8.3%) methylated. Methylation of PRA, but not PRB was significantly associated with worse outcome in the tamoxifen-treated group. Mechanisms other than promoter methylation may be more dominant for loss of PR. Isoform-specific methylation events suggest independent regulation of PRA and PRB. Finally, this article shows for the first time that PRA methylation plays a unique role in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.
    Clinical Cancer Research 04/2011; 17(12):4177-86. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2950 · 8.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reviews work on progesterone and the progesterone receptor (PR) in the mouse mammary gland that has been used extensively as an experimental model. Studies have led to the concept that progesterone controls proliferation and morphogenesis of the luminal epithelium in a tightly orchestrated manner at distinct stages of development by paracrine signaling pathways, including receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) as a major paracrine factor. Progesterone also drives expansion of stem cells by paracrine signals to generate progenitors required for alveologenesis. During mid-to-late pregnancy, progesterone has another role to suppress secretory activation until parturition mediated in part by crosstalk between PR and prolactin/Stat5 signaling to inhibit induction of milk protein gene expression, and by inhibiting tight junction closure. In models of hormone-dependent mouse mammary tumors, the progesterone/PR signaling axis enhances pre-neoplastic progression by a switch from a paracrine to an autocrine mode of proliferation and dysregulation of the RANKL signaling pathway. Limited experiments with normal human breast show that progesterone/PR signaling also stimulates epithelial cell proliferation by a paracrine mechanism; however, the signaling pathways and whether RANKL is a major mediator remains unknown. Work with human breast cancer cell lines, patient tumor samples and clinical studies indicates that progesterone is a risk factor for breast cancer and that alteration in progesterone/PR signaling pathways contributes to early stage human breast cancer progression. However, loss of PR expression in primary tumors is associated with a less differentiated more invasive phenotype and worse prognosis, suggesting that PR may limit later stages of tumor progression.
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 12/2011; 357(1-2):4-17. DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.030 · 4.24 Impact Factor