If You Build It, Will They Come? Designing Truly Patient-Centered Health Care

National Partnership for Women and Families, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.97). 05/2010; 29(5):914-20. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0305
Source: PubMed


As the United States debates how to reorganize its health care system, policy makers must ask what patients really want and need from their primary care providers. There is often a disconnect between what patients say they want and what other providers or payers think patients want. Our research at the National Partnership for Women and Families suggests that a truly patient-centered health care system must be designed to incorporate features that matter to patients--including "whole person" care, comprehensive communication and coordination, patient support and empowerment, and ready access. Without these features, and without consumer input into the design, ongoing practice, and evaluation of new models, patients may reject new approaches such as medical homes and accountable care organizations.

1 Follower
10 Reads
  • Source
    • "Patients have described the patient-centered medical home in the continuum of ‘parent’s home, nursing home and funeral home’ [7]. Yet when encouraged to express in their own words what they desire in health care, patients articulate the importance of the core functional elements of primary care such as accessibility, continuity, and coordination [8]. These elements also need to be present in the patient-centered medical home and into the medical neighborhood. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health care reform in the US has introduced terms such as 'the patient-centered medical home' and 'integrated care' that are often unclear and unfamiliar to patients. This study explored patient experiences with the functional domains of integrated care. Patients first wrote their definitions of integrated care and then participated in focus group discussions about their experiences with the health care system. Transcripts were analyzed for thematic content. Forty-four patients participated in one of seven focus groups in San Francisco, CA in English and Spanish. Many patients were not clear about the meaning of the term integrated care. However, patients described experiences largely reflected in an existing conceptual model of integrated care and the importance of coordination within and across teams and with community resources, continuity and sharing of information, and patient engagement. Patients with high medical needs described the ubiquitous challenges they faced in experiencing coordinated care. Patients may not understand the term integrated care but are relatively clear on what the concept of integrated care entails and support its successful implementation. Patients and their families are at the center of integrated care, and health systems need to support and empower them to successfully navigate the medical neighborhood.
    International journal of integrated care 03/2013; 13:e004. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the release in November 2005 of the Institute of Medicine Report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition [1], public attention was drawn to the unique, complex, and largely unmet healthcare needs of the growing population of individuals who were making, or had already made, the transition from active patient to posttreatment recovery and beyond. For many of us, this event, accompanied as these reports usually are with formal briefings and considerable media flurry, was seen as an important turning point. Just as the founding members of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) gave us new language for what it meant to be a “survivor” (, the Lost in Transition report firmly established a distinct place on the continuum of cancer care for research and practice addressing “survivorship.” Dispensing with the outdated medical definition of a survivor that required someone to remain disease-free for a minimum of 5 years after treatment to earn this status, coalition members argued convincingly in 1986 that a person could call him- or herself a survivor from the moment of diagnosis and for the remainder of life. This, they successfully argued, was the only way to ensure that the focus of care, and cancer-related decisions, would be on achieving a full and meaningful future life, worth living, for the individual. That definition revolutionized cancer care. In a similar way, 25 years later, the Lost in Transition report has given us the next paradigm shift.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Legislation that supports the establishment of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) was recently enacted into law as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and in 2012 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will begin contracting with ACOs. Although ACOs will play a significant role in reform of the U.S. health care delivery system, thus far, discussions have focused exclusively on the coordination of conventional health services. This article discusses the potential engagement of the complementary and alternative (CAM) workforce in ACOs and the foreseeable impacts of ACO legislation on the future of U.S. CAM services.
    Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) 08/2011; 17(8):669-74. DOI:10.1089/acm.2011.0364 · 1.59 Impact Factor
Show more


10 Reads
Available from