A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables.

Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Psychological Bulletin (Impact Factor: 14.39). 05/2010; 136(3):375-89. DOI: 10.1037/a0018883
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A substantial amount of research has been conducted in an effort to understand the impact of short-term (<48 hr) total sleep deprivation (SD) on outcomes in various cognitive domains. Despite this wealth of information, there has been disagreement on how these data should be interpreted, arising in part because the relative magnitude of effect sizes in these domains is not known. To address this question, we conducted a meta-analysis to discover the effects of short-term SD on both speed and accuracy measures in 6 cognitive categories: simple attention, complex attention, working memory, processing speed, short-term memory, and reasoning. Seventy articles containing 147 cognitive tests were found that met inclusion criteria for this study. Effect sizes ranged from small and nonsignificant (reasoning accuracy: g = -0.125, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.02]) to large (lapses in simple attention: g = -0.776, 95% CI [-0.96, -0.60], p < .001). Across cognitive domains, significant differences were observed for both speed and accuracy; however, there were no differences between speed and accuracy measures within each cognitive domain. Of several moderators tested, only time awake was a significant predictor of between-studies variability, and only for accuracy measures, suggesting that heterogeneity in test characteristics may account for a significant amount of the remaining between-studies variance. The theoretical implications of these findings for the study of SD and cognition are discussed.


Available from: Julian Lim, Apr 22, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability to manage human fatigue in transport operations would be improved by a shared understanding of what fatigue is, how it should be measured, and how it affects safety performance. This may be achieved by a broader operationalization of fatigue, which would allow commonly studied aspects of fatigue to be considered alongside each other, and make explicit those aspects of fatigue that individual studies do and do not account for. According to such an operationalization, fatigue should be measured in terms of experience, physiological state and performance. In studying the effects of fatigue on operators, there would be a need to for greater consideration of its longer-term effects, and its motivational aspects. To understand its performance effects would require that we attend to the systematic interaction of sleep history, time of day, time at work, and time on task, in the context of factors describing various aspects of work and non-work life.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective We aimed to build upon the state of knowledge about the impacts of sleep disruption into the domain of complex cognitive task performance for three types of sleep disruption: total sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, and circadian cycle. Background Sleep disruption affects human performance by increasing the likelihood of errors or the time it takes to complete tasks, such as the Psychomotor Vigilance Task. It is not clear whether complex tasks are affected in the same way. Understanding the impact of sleep disruption on complex cognitive tasks is important for, and in some instances more relevant to, professional workers confronted with unexpected, catastrophic failures following a period of disrupted sleep. Method Meta-analytic review methods were applied to each of the three different areas of sleep disruption research. Results Complex cognitive task performance declines over consecutive hours of continuous wakefulness as well as consecutive days of restricted sleep, is worse for severely restricted sleep (4 or fewer hours in bed), is worse during the circadian nadir than apex, and appears less degraded than simple task performance. Conclusion The reviews suggest that complex cognitive task performance may not be impacted by disrupted sleep as severely as simple cognitive task performance. Application Findings apply to predicting effects of sleep disruption on workers in safety-critical environments, such as health care, aviation, the military, process control, and in particular, safety-critical environments involving shiftwork or long-duration missions.
    Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 02/2015; DOI:10.1177/0018720815571935 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2012; 7(2):45. DOI:10.5958/j.0973-340X.7.2.010