Análisis de las principales variables de proceso que influyen en el rechazo de los cátodos durante el electrorrefino del cobre

Revista de Metalurgia (Impact Factor: 0.36). 06/2009; DOI: 10.3989/revmetalm.0729
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT An experimental circuit of copper electrorefining using three types of anodes coming from three different Chilean foundries: Hernán Videla Lira, Las Ventanas and El Teniente was used to simulate the electrorefining process. In this circuit the problem of the cathode rejection and the influence of some process variables in this phenomenon were studied. The variables analyzed were: electrolyte cell flow, solids in suspension, current density, lead doping in the anodes and density and particle size of the anodic slimes generated. The main results obtained from the experimental circuit were the following: the electrolyte flow doesn’t affect significantly the cathodic rejection, an increase of current density produces a decrease of cathodic rejections, the presence of the solids in suspension causes cathodes outside of norm, and to bigger quantity of lead in the anodes smallest were the rejections.Se trabajó en un circuito experimental de electrorrefinación de cobre, utilizando tres tipos de ánodos procedentes de tres fundiciones chilenas diferentes: Hernán Videla Lira, Las Ventanas y El Teniente. En este circuito, se estudió el problema del rechazo de cátodos y la influencia de algunas variables de proceso en este fenómeno. Las variables analizadas fueron: flujo de electrolito en la celda, sólidos en suspensión, densidad de corriente, dopado de plomo en los ánodos, densidad de los barros anódicos generados y tamaño de partícula de los barros anódicos. Los principales resultados obtenidos a partir del estudio del circuito experimental fueron los siguientes: el flujo de electrolito no afecta significativamente el rechazo de cátodos, a medida que aumenta la densidad de corriente disminuyen los rechazos, el aumento de los sólidos en suspensión provoca cátodos fuera de norma y a mayor cantidad de plomo en los ánodos menores fueron los rechazos.

Download full-text


Available from: Cristian Vargas, Aug 30, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On the basis of microscopic observations of anode copper and copper electrorefining slime by secondary electron images, backscattered electron images, characteristic X-ray images and elementary analysis of specimens and using data from the literature about the constitution of binary and more complicated systems of Cu with the impurities in the anode copper, a hypothesis about the origin of the spherical particles in the copper electrorefining slime has been postulated.It is established that the external shell and the core of the spherical particles have different chemical compositions; if the elements in the core undergo dissolution in the process of electrorefining, the particles become hollow.
    Hydrometallurgy 01/1994; 34(3-34):343-358. DOI:10.1016/0304-386X(94)90071-X · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The high quality standards of copper produced commercially today depend upon two process factors: (i) the effectiveness of the primary extraction step in safely eliminating damaging minor impurity elements; and (ii) the sustained refining capabilities of electrolytic cathode production. The principal source of new copper remains the sulphidic ores, and the evolution of primary extraction technology for sulphides from the mid-19th century to the present is briefly reviewed in relation to impurity treatment. Earlier industrial uses of copper in, for example, the sheathing of wooden ships' hulls, were tolerant of the relatively high impurity levels in fire refined copper, although the significance of impurities on service life was recognised. Modern electrolytic refining, which began in Wales in 1869, grew out of the Victorian fascination with decorative electrodeposition. By that time, studies of the links between copper composition and electrical conductivity in relation to the development of the submarine telegraph cable were beginning to show the crucial importance of copper purity for electrical applications. The rapid growth of these applications around the turn of the century produced a corresponding growth in demand for high purity copper, establishing electrorefining as the basis for modern, and increasingly exacting, quality standards. This growth has taken place against a background of profound changes in the geographical location, complexity and mineral processing of mineable copper deposits which continue to challenge the achievement of those standards.
    Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy IMM Transactions section C 03/2004; 113(1):25-37. DOI:10.1179/037195504225004652
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The mechanisms of floating slime formation during the electrorefining of anode copper and its removal in the presence of the reducing agent sulphur dioxide was investigated by X-ray diffraction data and microscopic examination of the solid phases which antimony forms, being predominantly trivalent or predominantly quinquivalent in the copper refining electrolytes. On the basis of experimental data on a laboratory and industrial scale, literature data and reference material it was concluded that: (a) The floating slime deposits slowly on the bottom of industrial electrolytic refining cells. Its particles are two-dimensional, have irregular shapes, rough surfaces and some part of them has colloid dimensions. Its specific gravity (3.55) is almost equal to that of the anode slime. In contrast to the anode slime, the floating slime is a ragged residue of amorphous structure. The floating slime consists of amorphous antimonious HSbO2(aq) and antimonic HSb(OH)6 acids. (b) Antimonious acid easily transforms into crystal anhydrous oxide Sb2O3 with specific gravity 5.7. Antimonic acid is reduced by sulphur dioxide to antimonious acid during the electrorefining of anode copper. Thus, instead of a floating residue, a crystal solid phase forms, which rapidly joins the anode slime on the bottom of the electrolytic refining cells.
    Hydrometallurgy 10/1997; 46(3-46):277-286. DOI:10.1016/S0304-386X(97)00024-8 · 2.22 Impact Factor