Article

Concepto, forma y longitud de los términos preferentes del tesauro: una propuesta de indicadores de calidad [Concept, form and length of the thesaurus preferred terms: a proposal for quality indicators]

Source: OAI

ABSTRACT In order to evaluate concept, form and length of thesaurus preferred terms, four indicators are proposed: 1) percentage of preferred terms designating more than one concept, 2) mean of words per preferred term, 3) percentage of preferred terms with non standard grammatical forms, and 4) percentage of preferred terms with non standard singular and plural forms. A test was carried out on three thesauri, showing nonconformities regarding the four indicators. We conclude that the proposed indicators can be useful for quality evaluation of thesaurus design and development.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Paola Mendes, Dec 24, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
57 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The literature of the last few decades reflects a steadily increasing concern with quantitative assessment of libraries and their services. This concern is both the result of, and a reaction to, growing pressures from within and without the library profession to adopt the tools of the management sciences. The pressures are generated by many factors including the success of these tools in other fields and their adoption by the organizations supporting libraries, the increasingly explicit character of competition for funds at all levels, and the complexity and critical nature of decisions on the host of new options being created by technology and by formalization of library networks.
    Journal of Documentation 01/1993; 29(3):315-332. DOI:10.1108/eb026561 · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In an attempt to improve the knowledge of the quality of the thesauri-based databases (DB), a Spanish professional user group was surveyed in order to uncover DB thesaurus quality factors. Factor analysis methodology was applied to the data matrix gathered from users' opinions on a restricted sample of social science DB thesauri. Using processes of exploration, explanation, and interpretation, researchers reduced the initial 39 variables to 4 main components, regarded as the main DB thesaurus quality factors. These four main components are conceptual framework, performance, format, and external aids. They may provide scholars with four approaches to the issue of thesaurus quality and the points where further research is needed.
    Library & Information Science Research 09/2008; 30(3):216-221. DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.12.003 · 1.63 Impact Factor