Discovery of abundant in situ silicate and spinel grains from red giant stars in a primtive meteorite

The Astrophysical Journal (Impact Factor: 6.73). 01/2004; DOI: 10.1086/424842
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT We report the discovery of 12 in situ presolar silicate and spinel grains, 140-590 nm in size, in the Acfer 094 meteorite. These grains represent a matrix-normalized abundance of presolar O-rich dust of 170 parts per million. Among the 10 silicate grains are three olivines, four pyroxenes, and three grains with glasslike composition. Eleven grains have large excesses in 17O with 17O/16O ratios of up to 2.9 times the solar ratio and slightly lower than or close-to-solar 18O/16O ratios. These grains most likely formed in 1.5-1.65 Msolar red giant branch (RGB) or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with close-to-solar metallicity. One pyroxene grain has close-to-solar 17O/16O and 18O/16O of 3.8 times solar. Silicon- and Fe-isotopic ratios of this grain are suggestive of the formation in an RGB or AGB star, probably with higher-than-solar metallicity. 29Si/28Si and 30Si/28Si ratios of the silicate grains vary by ~16%, are positively correlated with one another, and fall to the 30Si-poor side of the Si mainstream line characteristic for presolar SiC from AGB stars. This gives independent confirmation for the view that the Si mainstream line reflects the Galactic chemical evolution of the Si isotopes, except for a small shift due to dredge-up of matter from the He shell in AGB stars.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We carried out hypervelocity impact experiments in order to test the possibility that presolar grains are preferentially destroyed during impact of the comet 81P/Wild 2 samples into the Stardust Al foil collectors. Powdered samples of the ungrouped carbonaceous chondrite Acfer 094 were shot at 6 km s–1 into Stardust flight spare Al foil. Craters from the Acfer 094 test shots, as well as ones from the actual Stardust cometary foils, were analyzed by NanoSIMS ion imaging to search for presolar grains. We found two O-rich presolar grains and two presolar SiC grains in the Acfer 94 test shots, with measured abundances in the foils of 4 and 5 ppm, respectively, significantly lower than the amount of presolar grains actually present in this meteorite. Based on known abundances of these phases in Acfer 094, we estimate a loss of over 90% of the O-rich presolar grains; the fraction of SiC lost is lower, reflecting its higher resistance to destruction.
    The Astrophysical Journal 01/2013; 763(2):140. · 6.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We measured ^5^4Fe/^5^6Fe and ^5^7Fe/^5^6Fe as negative secondary ions of Fe oxide in eight presolar grains. One AGB grain is enriched in ^5^4Fe and ^5^7Fe. Another grain is depleted in ^5^7Fe; such deficits cannot be explained by current nucleosynthetic models.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although it has been suggested that the ungrouped carbonaceous chondrite Adelaide and the K chondrite Kakangari could be considered highly primitive, our study of their presolar grain abundances shows that both have experienced more secondary processing than other primitive chondrites with high presolar grain abundances. Presolar grains are rare in Kakangari and are present in reduced abundances in Adelaide (approximately 70 ppm for O-anomalous grains). Thermal annealing has led to widespread crystallization of their fine-grained matrices, and accounts for the partial to complete destruction of presolar grains. In addition, presolar silicates in Adelaide show elevated Fe abundances and Fe-rich rims indicative of infiltration of Fe into the grains from the surrounding matrix. This process probably also took place during annealing, most likely in the solar nebula, in a region with an enhanced dust-to-gas ratio. The most primitive meteorites, with the highest presolar grain abundances, appear to be those whose matrices contain abundant amorphous material that has escaped any significant thermal or aqueous alteration.
    Meteoritics & planetary science 06/2012; 47(6):992-1009. · 2.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014